Abstract
In this work, two types of predictability are proposed—forward and backward predictability—and then applied in the nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent approach to the Lorenz63 and Lorenz96 models to quantitatively estimate the local forward and backward predictability limits of states in phase space. The forward predictability mainly focuses on the forward evolution of initial errors superposed on the initial state over time, while the backward predictability is mainly concerned with when the given state can be predicted before this state happens. From the results, there is a negative correlation between the local forward and backward predictability limits. That is, the forward predictability limits are higher when the backward predictability limits are lower, and vice versa. We also find that the sum of forward and backward predictability limits of each state tends to fluctuate around the average value of sums of the forward and backward predictability limits of sufficient states. Furthermore, the average value is constant when the states are sufficient. For different chaotic systems, the average value is dependent on the chaotic systems and more complex chaotic systems get a lower average value. For a single chaotic system, the average value depends on the magnitude of initial perturbations. The average values decrease as the magnitudes of initial perturbations increase.
摘要
在研究工作中, 提出了向前与向后可预报性两类可预报性. 然后利用非线性局部Lyapunov指数(NLLE)方法定量估计了Lorenz63和Lorenz96模型中相空间状态点的局部向前与向后可预报期限. 向前可预报性主要关注与叠加在初始状态上初始误差随时间的向前演变, 而向后可预报性则主要关注给定状态在它发生之前何时被预测出来. 研究结果表明, 向前与向后可预报期限具有负相关关系. 也就是说, 当向前可预报期限比较大时, 向后可预报期限比较小, 反之亦然. 我们还发现每一个状态点的向前与向后可预报期限之和均在足够多的状态的两类可预报期限之和的平均值附近振荡. 此外, 当状态点的数目足够多时, 此平均值为常数. 对于不同的混沌系统, 此平均值的大小取决于混沌系统. 更加复杂的混沌系统拥有较低的平均值. 对于单个混沌系统, 此平均值依赖于初始误差量级的大小. 平均值随之初始误差量级的增大而减小.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, B. H., J. P. Li, and R. Q. Ding, 2006: Nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent and atmospheric predictability research. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 49, 1111–1120, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-006-1111-0.
Chou, J. F., 1989: Predictability of the atmosphere. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 6(3), 335–346, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661539.
Dalcher, A., and E. Kalnay, 1987: Error growth and predictability in operational ECMWF forecasts. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 39, 474–491, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v39i5.11774.
Ding, R. Q., and J. P. Li, 2007: Nonlinear finite-time Lyapunov exponent and predictability. Physics Letters A, 364, 396–400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2006.11.094.
Ding, R. Q., and J. P. Li, 2009: Application of nonlinear error growth dynamics in studies of atmospheric predictability. Acta Meteorologica Sinica, 67, 241–249, https://doi.org/10.11676/qxxb2009.024. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Ding, R. Q., J. P. Li, and K. J. Ha, 2008: Nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent and quantification of local predictability. Chinese Physics Letters, 25, 1919–1922, https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/25/5/109.
Ding, R. Q., J. P. Li, and K. H. Seo, 2010: Predictability of the Madden-Julian oscillation estimated using observational data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1004–1013, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3082.1.
Ding, R. Q., J. P. Li, F. Zheng, J. Feng, and D. Q. Liu, 2015: Estimating the limit of decadal-scale climate predictability using observational data. Climate Dyn., 46, 1563–1580, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2662-6.
Duan, W. S., and M. Mu, 2009: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation: Applications to stability, sensitivity, and predictability. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 52, 883–906, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-009-0090-3.
Duan, W. S., R. Q. Ding, and F. F. Zhou, 2013: Several dynamical methods used in predictability studies for numerical weather forecasts and climate prediction. Climatic and Environmental Research, 18, 524–538, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2012.12009. (in Chinese)
Farrell, B. F., 1990: Small error dynamics and the predictability of atmospheric flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2409–2416, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<2409:SEDATP>2.0.CO;2.
Feng, G. L., H. X. Cao, X. Q. Gao, W. J. Dong, and J. F. Chou, 2001: Prediction of precipitation during summer monsoon with self-memorial model. Adv. Atmos. Sci, 18(5), 701–709, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03403495.
Gao, X. Q., G. L. Feng, W. J. Dong, and J. F. Chou, 2003: On the predictability of chaotic systems with respect to maximally effective computation time. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 19, 134–139, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02487674.
Lacarra, J.-F., and O. Talagrand, 1988: Short-range evolution of small perturbations in a barotropic model. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 40, 81–95, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v40i2.11784.
Leith, C. E., 1971: Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 145–161, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0145:APATDT>2.0.CO;2.
Li, J. P., and R. Q. Ding, 2011a: Temporal-spatial distribution of atmospheric predictability limit by local dynamical analogs. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3265–3283, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05020.1.
Li, J. P., and R. Q. Ding, 2011b: Relationship between the predictability limit and initial error in chaotic systems. Chaotic Systems, InTech, 39–50.
Li, J. P., and R. Q. Ding, 2013: Temporal-spatial distribution of the predictability limit of monthly sea surface temperature in the global oceans. International Journal of Climatology, 33, 1936–1947, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3562.
Lorenz, E. N., 1963: Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2.
Lorenz, E. N., 1965: A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus, 17, 321–333, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v17i3.9076.
Lorenz, E. N., 1969a: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus, 21, 289–307, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x.
Lorenz, E. N., 1969b: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–646, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)26<636:APARBN>2.0.CO;2.
Lorenz, E. N., 1982: Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus, 34, 505–513, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v34i6.10836.
Lorenz, E. N., 1996: Predictability: A problem partly solved. Proc Seminar on Predictability, Shinfield Park, Reading, ECMWF, 1–18.
Luo, J.-J., S. Masson, S. K. Behera, and T. Yamagata, 2008: Extended ENSO predictions using a fully coupled ocean-atmosphere model. J. Climate, 21, 84–93, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1412.1.
Mu, M., and J. C. Wang, 2001: Nonlinear fastest growing perturbation and the first kind of predictability. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 44, 1128–1139, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906869.
Mu, M., and W. S. Duan, 2003: A new approach to studying ENSO predictability: Conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48, 1045–1047, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184224.
Mu, M., W. S. Duan, and J. C. Wang, 2002: The predictability problems in numerical weather and climate prediction. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 19(2), 191–204, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-002-0016-x.
Mu, M., H. Xu, and W. S. Duan, 2007: A kind of initial errors related to “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events in Zebiak-Cane model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L03709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027412.
Mukougawa, H., M. Kimoto, and S. Yoden, 1991: A relationship between local error growth and quasi-stationary states: Case study in the Lorenz system. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 1231–1237, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<1231:ARBLEG>2.0.CO;2.
Nese, J. M., 1989: Quantifying local predictability in phase space. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 35, 237–250, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(89)90105-X.
Peng, Y. H., W. S. Duan, and J. Xiang, 2011: Effect of stochastic MJO forcing on ENSO predictability. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 28(6), 1279–1290, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-011-0126-4.
Simmons, A. J., R. Mureau, and T. Petroliagis, 1995: Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 1739–1771, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152711.
Thompson, P. D., 1957: Uncertainty of initial state as a factor in the predictability of large scale atmospheric flow patterns. Tellus, 9, 275–295, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v9i3.9111.
Toth, Z., 1991: Estimation of atmospheric predictability by circulation analogs. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 65–72, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<0065:EOAPBC>2.0.CO;2.
Trevisan, A., and R. Legnani, 1995: Transient error growth and local predictability: A study in the Lorenz system. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 47, 103–117, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v47i1.11496.
Yoden, S., and M. Nomura, 1993: Finite-time Lyapunov stability analysis and its application to atmospheric predictability. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 1531–1543, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<1531:FTLSAA>2.0.CO;2.
Zhou, F. F., R. Q. Ding, G. L. Feng, Z. T. Fu, and W. S. Duan, 2012: Progress in the study of nonlinear atmospheric dynamics and predictability of weather and climate in China (2007–2011). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 29(5), 1048–1062, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-012-1204-y.
Ziehmann, C., L. A. Smith, and J. Kurths, 2000: Localized Lyapunov exponents and the prediction of predictability. Physics Letters A, 271, 237–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00336-4.
Zou, M. W., G. L. Feng, and X. Q. Gao, 2006: Sensitivity of intrinsic mode functions of Lorenz system to initial values based on EMD method. Chinese Physics, 15, 1384–1390, https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-1963/15/6/043.
Acknowledgements
This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Excellent Young Scholars (Grant No. 41522502), the National Program on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction (Grant Nos. GASI-IPOVAI-06 and GASI-IPOVAI-03), and the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2015BAC03B07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• Two new concepts—forward and backward predictabilities—are introduced and their algorithms given.
• Local forward and backward predictability limits are correlated negatively, which results from the local conservation of forward and backward predictability limits.
• The local conservation value of forward and backward predictability limits depends on the complexity of chaotic systems and the magnitude of initial perturbations.
• For a single chaotic system, a larger magnitude of initial perturbations results in a lower conservation value; and for different chaotic systems, a more complex system has a lower conservation value when the magnitudes of initial perturbations are the same.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Ding, R. & Li, J. Determination of the Backward Predictability Limit and Its Relationship with the Forward Predictability Limit. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 36, 669–677 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8205-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-019-8205-z
Key words
- nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent
- forward and backward predictability limit
- negative correlation
- average value