Abstract
This paper evaluates the microwave instruments onboard the latest Chinese polar-orbiting satellite, Feng-Yun 3D (FY-3D). Comparing three months of observations from the Microwave Temperature Sounder 2 (MWTS-2), the Microwave Humidity Sounder 2 (MWHS-2), and the Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI) to Met Office short-range forecasts, we characterize the instrumental biases, show how those biases have changed with respect to their predecessors onboard FY-3C, and how they compare to the Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) onboard NOAA-20 and the Global Precipitation Measurement Microwave Imager (GMI). The MWTS-2 global bias is much reduced with respect to its predecessor and compares well to ATMS at equivalent channel frequencies, differing only by 0.36 ± 0.28 K (1σ) on average. A suboptimal averaging of raw digital counts is found to cause an increase in striping noise and an ascending—descending bias. MWHS-2 benefits from a new calibration method improving the 183-GHz humidity channels with respect to its predecessor and biases for these channels are within ± 1.9 K to ATMS. MWRI presents the largest improvements, with reduced global bias and standard deviation with respect to FY-3C; although, spurious, seemingly transient, brightness temperatures have been detected in the observations at 36.5 GHz (vertical polarization). The strong solar-dependent bias that affects the instrument on FY-3C has been reduced to less than 0.2 K on average for FY-3D MWRI. Experiments where radiances from these instruments were assimilated on top of a full global system demonstrated a neutral to positive impact on the forecasts, as well as on the fit to the background of independent instruments.
摘要
本文旨在对中国最新极轨气象卫星FY-3D搭载的微波遥感仪器进行评估。通过对FY-3D微波温度计II型(MWTS-2)、微波湿度计II型(MWHS-2)和微波成像仪(MWRI)连续三个月观测数据与英国气象局短期预报的比较验证,得到了仪器误差。研究了这些仪器与FY-3C的区别,同时与美国NOAA-20卫星搭载的先进技术微波探测器(ATMS)、美国国家航天局(NASA)全球降水测量卫星(GPM)搭载的微波成像仪(GMI)进行了比较。FY-3D MWTS-2的平均全球偏差值为0.36 ± 0.28 K (1σ),比FY-3C MWTS有较大降低,同时优于ATMS中同等频率的误差。仪器计数值的次优平均值会导致条带噪声的增加以及误差值的上升和下降。同时,利用一种新定标方法,FY-3D MWHS-2在183 GHz通道的性能得到了提高,优于FY-3C MWHS,与ATMS的偏差值在± 1.9 K之间。尽管在36.5 GHz(垂直极化)观测中检测到了短暂虚假的亮温,FY-3D MWRI在全球偏差和标准差上均优于FY-3C MWRI。对于FY-3D MWRI,受太阳影响的误差值较FY-3C降低到了0.2K。
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, N., Q. F. Lu, B. Bell, F. Carminati, K. Lean, N. Bormann, and H. Lawrence, 2015: The FY-3C Evaluation Project: Microwave Sounder Calibration and Direct Broadcast Experiences. [Available from https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/itwg/itsc/itsc20/papers/1_02_atkinson_paper.pdf.]
Bauer, P., A. Thorpe, and G. Brunet, 2015: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. Nature, 525, t47–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14956.
Bell, W., and Coauthors, 2008: The assimilation of SSMIS radiances in numerical weather prediction models. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 46, 884–900, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.917335.
Bennartz, R., A. Thoss, A. Dybbroe, and D. B. Michelson, 2002: Precipitation analysis using the advanced microwave sounding unit in support of nowcasting applications. Meteorological Applications, 9(2), 177–189, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482702002037.
Berg, W., and Coauthors, 2016: Intercalibration of the GPM microwave radiometer constellation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 33(12), 2639–2654, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0100.1.
Bobak, J. P., D. J. Dowgiallo, T. E. vonRentzell, and N. R. McGlothlin, 2005: Satellite calibration and validation utilizing the Airborne Polarimetric Microwave Imaging Radiometer (APMIR). Proc. OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE, Washington, DC, IEEE, 352–354, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1639787.
Booton, A., W. Bell, and N. Atkinson, 2014: An improved bias correction for SSMIS. [Available from https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/itwg/itsc/itsc19/program/papers/10_03_booton.pdf]
Bormann, N., A. Fouilloux, and W. Bell, 2013: Evaluation and assimilation of ATMS data in the ECMWF system. J. Geophys. Res., 118(23), 12 970–12 980, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020325.
Brogniez, H., and Coauthors, 2016: A review of sources of systematic errors and uncertainties in observations and simulations at 183 GHz. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(5), 2207–2221, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2207-2016.
Burgdorf, M., S. A. Buehler, T. Lang, S. Michel, and I. Hans, 2016: The moon as a photometric calibration standard for microwave sensors. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9, 3467–3475, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3467-2016.
Calbet, X., and Coauthors, 2018: Can turbulence within the field of view cause significant biases in radiative transfer modelling at the 183 GHz band? Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-181.
Cao, C. Y., M. Weinreb, and H. Xu, 2004: Predicting simultaneous nadir overpasses among polar-orbiting meteorological satellites for the intersatellite calibration of radiometers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 21, 537–542, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0537:PSNOAPv>.0.CO;2.
Carminati, F., J. Goddard, H. Lawrence, and S. Newman, 2017: Calibration/Validation Study of GPM GMI. Available from http://www.gaia-clim.eu/system/files/document/d4.6.pdf.
Carminati, F., B. Candy, W. Bell, and N. Atkinson, 2018: Assessment and assimilation of FY-3 humidity sounders and imager in the UK Met Office global model. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35(8), 942–954, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-018-7266-8.
Chen, K. Y., S. English, N. Bormann, and J. Zhu, 2015: Assessment of FY-3A and FY-3B MWHS observations. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 1280–1290, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0025.1.
Chen, K. Y., N. Bormann, S. English, and J. Zhu, 2018: Assimilation of Feng-Yun-3B satellite microwave humidity sounder data over land. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35(3), 268–275, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7088-0.
English, S. J., J. R. Eyre, and J. A. Smith, 1999: A cloud-detection scheme for use with satellite sounding radiances in the context of data assimilation for numerical weather prediction. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 125(559), 2359–s2378, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555902.
English, S. J., R. J. Renshaw, P. C. Dibben, A. J. Smith, P. J. Rayer, C. Poulsen, F. W. Saunders, and J. R. Eyre, 2000: A comparison of the impact of TOVS arid ATOVS satellite sounding data on the accuracy of numerical weather forecasts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 126, 2911–2931, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656915.
Geer, A. J., P. Bauer, and N. Bormann, 2010: Solar biases in microwave imager observations assimilated at ECMWF. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 48, 2660–2669, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2040186.
Gu, X. F., and X. D. Tong, 2015: Overview of China earth observation satellite programs [Space Agencies]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 3(3), 113–129, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2015.2467172.
Guo, Y., J. Y. He, S. Y. Gu, and N. M. Lu, 2019: Calibration and validation of Feng Yun-3-D microwave humidity sounder II. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2957403.
He, J. Y., S. W. Zhang, and Z. Z. Wang, 2015: Advanced microwave atmospheric sounder (AMAS) channel specifications and T/V calibration results on FY-3C satellite. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 53(1), 481–493, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2324173.
Joo, S., J. Eyre, and R. Marriott, 2013: The impact of MetOp and other satellite data within the met office global NWP system using an adjoint-based sensitivity method. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 3331–3342, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00232.1.
Kazumori, M., and S. J. English, 2015: Use of the ocean surface wind direction signal in microwave radiance assimilation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 1354–1375, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2445.
Kazumori, M., A. J. Geer, and S. J. English, 2016: Effects of allsky assimilation of GCOM-W/AMSR2 radiances in the ECMWF numerical weather prediction system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 142, 721–737, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2669.
Lawrence, H., and Coauthors, 2017: An Evaluation of FY-3C MWRI and Assessment of the Long-Term Quality of FY-3C MWHS-2 at ECMWF and the Met Office. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. [Available from https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2017/17206-evaluation-fy-3c-mwri-and-assessment-long-term-qualityfy-3c-mwhs-2-ecmwf-and-met-office.pdf]
Lawrence, H., N. Bormann, A. J. Geer, Q. F. Lu, and S. J. English, 2018: Evaluation and assimilation of the microwave sounder MWHS-2 onboard FY-3C in the ECMWF numerical weather prediction system. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 56(6), 3333–3349, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2798292.
Li, J., and G. Q. Liu, 2016: Direct assimilation of Chinese FY-3C microwave temperature sounder-2 radiances in the global GRAPES system. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9, 3095–3113, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-3095-2016.
Li, J., Z. K. Qin, and G. Q. Liu, 2016: A new generation of Chinese FY-3C microwave sounding measurements and the initial assessments of its observations. Int. J. Remote Sens., 37, 4035–4058, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1207260.
Lorenc, A. C., and Coauthors, 2000: The Met. office global threedimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 126, 2991–3012, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712657002.
Lu, Q. F., H. Lawrence, N. Bormann, S. English, K. Lean, N. Atkinson, W. Bell, and F. Carminati, 2015: An Evaluation of FY-3C Satellite Data Quality at ECMWF and the Met Office, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. Available from https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2015/14692-evaluation-fy-3c-satellite-dataquality-ecmwf-and-met-office.pdf.
Macelloni, G., M. Brogioni, P. Pampaloni, A. Cagnati, and M. R. Drinkwater, 2006: DOMEX 2004: An experimental campaign at Dome-C Antarctica for the calibration of spaceborne low-frequency microwave radiometers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44(10), 2642–2653, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.882801.
Moradi, I., R. R. Ferraro, P. Eriksson, and F. Z. Weng, 2015: Intercalibration and validation of observations from ATMS and SAPHIR microwave sounders. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 53, 5915–5925, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2427165.
Newell, D., and Coauthors, 2014: GPM microwave imager key performance and calibration results. Proc. 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Quebec City, IEEE, 3754–3757, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947300.
Newman, S., F. Carminati, H. Lawrence, N. Bormann, K. Salonen, and W. Bell, 2020: Assessment of new satellite missions within the framework of numerical weather prediction. Remote Sensing, 12, 1580, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101580.
Pielke, R., Jr., and R. E. Carbone, 2002: Weather impacts, forecasts, and policy: An integrated perspective. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 393–406, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0393:WIFAP>2.3.CO;2.
Rawlins, F., S. P. Ballard, K. J. Bovis, A. M. Clayton, D. Li, G. W. Inverarity, A. C. Lorenc, and T. J. Payne, 2007: The Met Office global four-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 347–362, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.32.
Rodgers, C. D., 2000: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice. World Scientific Publishing Singapore.
Saunders, R., and Coauthors, 2018: An update on the RTTOV fast radiative transfer model (currently at version 12). Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-64.
Saunders, R. W., T. A. Blackmore, B. Candy, P. N. Francis, and T. J. Hewison, 2013: Monitoring satellite radiance biases using NWP models. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 51(3), 1124–1138, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2229283.
Tian, X. X., X. L. Zou, and S. P. Yang, 2018: A limb correction method for the microwave temperature sounder 2 and its applications. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35(12), 1547–1552, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-018-8092-8.
Uppala, S. M., and Coauthors, 2005: The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.176.
Wang, X., and X. Li, 2014: Preliminary investigation of FengYun-3C Microwave Temperature Sounder (MWTS) measurements. Remote Sensing Letters, 5(12), 1002–1011, https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2014.988305.
Wang, Z. Z., J. Y. Li, J. Y. He, S. W. Zhang, S. Y. Gu, Y. Li, Y. Guo, and B. Y. He, 2019: Performance analysis of microwave humidity and temperature sounder onboard the FY-3D satellite from prelaunch multiangle calibration data in thermal/vacuum test. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 57, 1664–1683, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2868324.
Xie, X. X., S. L. Wu, H. X. Xu, W. M. Yu, J. K. He, and S. Y. Gu, 2018: Ascending\3-descending bias correction of microwave radiation imager on board FengYun-3C. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 57(6), 3126–3134, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2881094.
Yang, H., and Coauthors, 2011: The FengYun-3 microwave radiation imager on-orbit verification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 49(11), 4552–4560, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2148200.
Yang, H., J. Zhou, F. Z. Weng, N. H. Sun, K. Anderson, Q. H. Liu, and E. J. Kim, 2018: Developing vicarious calibration for microwave sounding instruments using lunar radiation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 56(11), 6723–6733, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2841997.
Yang, J. X., D. S. McKague, and C. S. Ruf, 2016b: Boreal, temperate, and tropical forests as vicarious calibration sites for spaceborne microwave radiometry. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 54(2), 1035–1051, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2472532.
Yang, W. Z., V. O. John, X. P. Zhao, H. Lu, and K. R. Knapp, 2016a: Satellite climate data records: Development, applications, and societal benefits. Remote Sensing, 8, 331, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040331.
Zou, C. Z., and W. H. Wang, 2011: Intersatellite calibration of AMSU-A observations for weather and climate applications. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D23113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016205.
Zou, X. L., J. Zhao, F. Z. Weng, and Z. K. Qin, 2012: Detection of radio-frequency interference signal over land from FY-3B Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 50(12), 4994–5003, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2191792.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• MWTS-2 global bias is reduced with respect to its predecessor and compares well to the reference U.S. instruments, although it is noisier.
• MWHS-2 benefits from a new calibration improving the 183-GHz channels, with a noise comparable to the reference U.S. instrument.
• MWRI has reduced global bias and noise with respect to its predecessor, but with spurious transient brightness temperatures in one channel.
• Assimilation of FY-3D microwave radiances in the Met Office NWP system has a neutral to positive impact on forecasts.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Carminati, F., Atkinson, N., Candy, B. et al. Insights into the Microwave Instruments Onboard the Fengyun 3D Satellite: Data Quality and Assimilation in the Met Office NWP System. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 38, 1379–1396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0010-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0010-1