Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical impact of successful recanalization for chronic total occlusion: insights from stress myocardial perfusion imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinical benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess the quantitative therapeutic benefits of successful PCI for CTO from the clinical data acquired by myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Consecutive 42 patients, who were successfully revascularized of CTO between August 2013 and March 2018, were examined. A stress MPI was performed before CTO PCI and at follow-up, and the changes in quantitative gated and perfusion single photon emission computed tomography parameters were examined. The follow-up interval was 18 ± 9 (median 14) months, during which 36 patients were maintained patency (patent CTO), while 6 were re-occluded (R/O CTO). The reduction in the % myocardial ischemia and the improvement in the ejection fraction were significantly higher in the patent CTO group than those in the R/O CTO group (67.5 ± 37.0% vs. − 56.4 ± 84.9%, p < 0.0001, 20.7 ± 49.8% vs. − 9.2 ± 20.6%, p = 0.0247, respectively). Interestingly, the improvements we observed were predominantly in the patients with LAD CTO rather than those with RCA or LCx CTO. Successful CTO PCI was able to reduce myocardial ischemia and improve the cardiac function when the patency after CTO PCI was maintained, with the most notable significance in the patients with LAD CTO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tajstra M, Gasior M, Gierlotka M, Pres D, Hawranek M, Trzeciak P, Lekston A, Polonski L, Zembala M (2012) Comparison of five-year outcomes of patients with and without chronic total occlusion of noninfarct coronary artery after primary coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 109(2):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gierlotka M, Tajstra M, Gasior M, Hawranek M, Osadnik T, Wilczek K, Olszowski D, Dyrbus K, Polonski L (2013) Impact of chronic total occlusion artery on 12-month mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PL-ACS Registry). Int J Cardiol 168(1):250–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aziz S, Stables RH, Grayson AD, Perry RA, Ramsdale DR (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: improved survival for patients with successful revascularization compared to a failed procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70(1):15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grantham JA, Jones PG, Cannon L, Spertus JA (2010) Quantifying the early health status benefits of successful chronic total occlusion recanalization: results from the FlowCardia’s Approach to Chronic Total Occlusion Recanalization (FACTOR) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 3(3):284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamoto E, Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Ono K, Mitsudo K, Nobuyoshi M, Doi O, Tamura T, Tanaka M, Kimura T, CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2 Investigators (2013) Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (from the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2). Am J Cardiol 112(6):767–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan MF, Wendel CS, Thai HM, Movahed MR (2013) Effects of percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82(1):95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. George S, Cockburn J, Clayton TC, Ludman P, Cotton J, Spratt J, Redwood S, de Belder M, de Belder A, Hill J, Hoye A, Palmer N, Rathore S, Gershlick A, Di Mario C, Hildick-Smith D, British Cardiovascular Intervention Society, National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (2014) Long-term follow-up of elective chronic total coronary occlusion angioplasty: analysis from the U.K. Central Cardiac Audit Database. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(3):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tajstra M, Pyka L, Gorol J, Pres D, Gierlotka M, Gadula-Gacek E, Kurek A, Wasiak M, Hawranek M, Zembala MO, Lekston A, Polonski L, Bryniarski L, Gasior M (2016) Impact of chronic total occlusion of the coronary artery on long-term prognosis in patients with ischemic systolic heart failure: insights from the COMMIT-HF Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(17):1790–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Safley DM, House JA, Marso SP, Grantham JA, Rutherford BD (2008) Improvement in survival following successful percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary chronic total occlusions: variability by target vessel. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(3):295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Toma A, Elhadj Z, Laroussi L, Gaemperli O, Behnes M, Akin I, Luscher TF, Neumann FJ, Mashayekhi K (2017) Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10(21):2158–2170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, Rumoroso JR, Erglis A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, di Mario C, Hovasse T, Teruel L, Bufe A, Lauer B, Bogaerts K, Goicolea J, Spratt JC, Gershlick AH, Galassi AR, Louvard Y, EUROCTO trial investigators (2018) A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J 39(26):2484–2493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gutierrez-Chico JL, Louvard Y (2017) DECISION-CTO: a “negative” clinical trial? Really? Cardiol J 24(3):231–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henriques JP, Hoebers LP, Ramunddal T, Laanmets P, Eriksen E, Bax M, Ioanes D, Suttorp MJ, Strauss BH, Barbato E, Nijveldt R, van Rossum AC, Marques KM, Elias J, van Dongen IM, Claessen BE, Tijssen JG, van der Schaaf RJ, Investigators ET (2016) Percutaneous intervention for concurrent chronic total occlusions in patients with STEMI: the EXPLORE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(15):1622–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS (2003) Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 107(23):2900–2907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, Weintraub WS, O’Rourke RA, Dada M, Spertus JA, Chaitman BR, Friedman J, Slomka P, Heller GV, Germano G, Gosselin G, Berger P, Kostuk WJ, Schwartz RG, Knudtson M, Veledar E, Bates ER, McCallister B, Teo KK, Boden WE, Investigators C (2008) Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117(10):1283–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel VG, Brayton KM, Tamayo A, Mogabgab O, Michael TT, Lo N, Alomar M, Shorrock D, Cipher D, Abdullah S, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES (2013) Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: a weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6(2):128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sirnes PA, Myreng Y, Molstad P, Bonarjee V, Golf S (1998) Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion after successful recanalization of chronic coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J 19(2):273–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dzavik V, Carere RG, Mancini GB, Cohen EA, Catellier D, Anderson TE, Barbeau G, Lazzam C, Title LM, Berger PB, Labinaz M, Teo KK, Buller CE, Total Occlusion Study of Canada Investigators (2001) Predictors of improvement in left ventricular function after percutaneous revascularization of occluded coronary arteries: a report from the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA). Am Heart J 142(2):301–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoebers LP, Claessen BE, Elias J, Dangas GD, Mehran R, Henriques JP (2015) Meta-analysis on the impact of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on left ventricular function and clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol 187:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiro Kawasaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All author and co-author have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Umeji, K., Kawasaki, T., Koga, H. et al. Clinical impact of successful recanalization for chronic total occlusion: insights from stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Heart Vessels 35, 894–900 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01559-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01559-3

Keywords

Navigation