Advertisement

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 225–237 | Cite as

The Crime of Radical Industrial Unionism

  • Ahmed WhiteEmail author
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

A great deal of scholarship documents the history of antiradical repression in the United States. But this literature remains incomplete, particularly regarding the role of state laws and state authorities in undermining campaigns for radical industrial unionism in the first half of the Twentieth Century. This essay addresses this issue, describing how state-level sedition laws were used against the Industrial Workers of the World and communist unions, while also highlighting how progressive politicians and jurists joined with the capitalist sponsors of these laws and their conservative allies in government in promoting these efforts. While it avoids suggesting that such prosecutions were the only, or even primary, reasons for the demise of radical industrial unionism, this essay argues that the history of these laws must feature prominently in any attempt to understand this movement’s tragic fate and to comprehend the role of the state in labor history.

Keywords

Industrial unionism Labor repression Civil liberties Progressivism 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by either of the authors. There were no individual participants in this study and, thus, informed consent does not apply to this study.

References

  1. Annual Reports of the ACLU (1931) Volume 1, 1920–1930 (1931). New York: Arno.Google Scholar
  2. Annual Reports of the ACLU (1941) Volume 2, 1931–1941 (1941). New York: Arno.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, A. (2007). Radical innocent: Upton Sinclair. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) 395 U.S. 444, 454.Google Scholar
  5. Bubka, T. (1970). The Harlan County coal strike of 1931. Labor History, 11, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CDDC Bulletin (1923). Aug. 11, 1923, in box 4, IWW Seattle joint branches Collection, University of Washington Special Collections.eGoogle Scholar
  7. Chester, E. T. (2014). The Wobblies in their heyday. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  8. Dowell, E.F. (1936). A history of the enactment of criminal syndicalism legislation in the United States. PhD Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  9. Dowell, E. F. (1939). A history of criminal syndicalism legislation in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dubofsky, M. (1969). We shall be all: A history of the industrial Workers of the World. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  11. Four Wobblies guilty (1923). Los Angeles Times, May 12, 1923, p.15.Google Scholar
  12. Gambs, J. S. (1966). The decline of the I.W.W. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, I. (n.d.). They were called reds. Unpublished manuscript, Irvin Goodman Papers, Oregon Historical Society.Google Scholar
  14. Gunns, A. F. (1983). Civil liberties in crisis: The Pacific northwest, 1917–1920. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  15. Henderson, R.W. (1922). Constructive conspiracy and the membership clause of the California syndicalist act. Google Scholar
  16. Hevener, J. W. (1978). Which side are you on? The Harlan County coal miners, 1931–1939. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kinsley, P. (1923). Evidence ends in Foster trial; arguments await, Chicago Daily Tribune, Mar. 31, p.3.Google Scholar
  18. Kohn, S. M. (1994). American political prisoners: Prosecutions under the espionage and sedition acts. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  19. Lennon, M.A. (2002). Creating coalitions: “Outside agitators” and the Harlan County coal strike, 1931–1932, PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  20. Letter from Charlotte Whitney to Roger Baldwin (1922). Volume 213, p.157, ACLU Papers.Google Scholar
  21. Muselin, P. (1990). The steel fist in a Pennsylvania company town, in Shultz. B., and Shultz, R., eds., It did happen here: recollections of political repression in America. Oakland: University of California Press, 65.Google Scholar
  22. Oakland I.W.W. spurns judge’s offer to pardon. (1921). Industrial Solidarity. Dec., 31(1921), 5.Google Scholar
  23. Papke, D. (1994). Eugene Debs as legal heretic, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 63, 339–375.Google Scholar
  24. Preston, W. (1963). Aliens and dissenters: Federal suppression of radicals, 1903–1933. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Reds overflow Tacoma’s jail (1920). Los Angeles Times, Jan. 3, 1920, p.I3.Google Scholar
  26. Salvatore, N. (1982). Eugene V. Debs: Citizen and socialist. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schreiber, H. N. (1960). The Wilson administration and civil liberties. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sims, R. C. (1975). Idaho’s criminal syndicalism act: One state’s response to radical labor. Labor History, 15, 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Slutsky, B. (2010). Parlor pink turned soapbox red: The trial of Charlotte Anita Whitney. American Communist History, 9, 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solidarity forever: An oral history of the IWW (1985). Chicago: Lake View Press.Google Scholar
  31. Syndicalism law secures its first victim (1917). Evening Capital News (Boise, ID), Oct. 24, 1917, p.5.Google Scholar
  32. Twenty-seven Los Angeles IWWs convicted; transport workers call protest (1923). Industrial worker, Jul. 18, 1923, p.1.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Attorney General, Annual Report. (1924). Washington. DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, F. and Munter, P. (1931). The great northwest sees red, Labor Defender, (May) 94.Google Scholar
  35. Warren, E. (1977). The memoirs of earl Warren. New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
  36. Whitten, W. W. (1969). Criminal syndicalism and the law in California: 1919-1927. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 59, 3–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Colorado School of LawBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations