Skip to main content
Log in

Formation of defects during fullerene bombardment and repair of vacancy defects in graphene

  • Computation & theory
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of high-energy ions or clusters to bombard graphene is emerging as a new method for the theoretical study of graphene properties. In this study, using molecular dynamics simulations and empirical potentials, the behaviors of graphene after bombardment by C60 under different initial velocities from 13.7 to 15.7 km/s were investigated. The simulations showed four types of defects: Stone–Wales defects, single vacancy defects, multiple vacancy defects, and out-of-plane carbon adatoms. The self-healing phenomenon of defective graphene was observed. In the low-speed region (< 14.5 km/s), the self-healing ability of graphene is enhanced at higher temperature. However, the effect of temperature is not obvious in the high-speed region, where velocity dominates. To repair vacancy defects in graphene, a physical method was proposed. The initial positions of lost atoms were traced, and then, the atoms were slowly dropped into the vacancy defects to effect repair. The simulations provide a fundamental understanding of bombardment between graphene and C60 and propose a new method for repairing vacancy defects in graphene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, Dubonos SV, Firsov AA (2005) Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438:197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen SBT, Ruoff RS (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellido EP, Seminario JM (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of folding of supported graphene. J Phys Chem C 114:22472–22477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Y, Tan YW, Stormer HL, Kim P (2005) Experimental observation of the quantum hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438:201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Son YW, Cohen ML, Louie SG (2006) Half-metallic graphene nanoribbons. Nature 444:347–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heersche HB, Jarillo-Herrero P, Oostinga JB, Vandersypen LMK, Morpurgo AF (2007) Bipolar supercurrent in graphene. Nature 446:56–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sreeprasad TS, Berry V (2013) How Do the electrical properties of graphene change with its functionalization? Small 9:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajasekaran G, Narayanan P, Parashar A (2016) Effect of point and line defects on mechanical and thermal properties of graphene: a review. Crit Rev Solid State 41:47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mortazavi B, Ahzi S (2013) Thermal conductivity and tensile response of defective graphene: a molecular dynamics study. Carbon 63:460–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu L, Miaoqing Q, Yibo W, Shimou C (2015) Defects in graphene: generation, healing, and their effects on the properties of graphene: a review. J Mater Sci Technol 31:599–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lherbier A, Dubois SMM, Declerck X, Niquet YM, Roche S, Charlier JC (2012) Transport properties of 2d graphene containing structural defects. Phys Rev B 86:075402–075411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ping Y, Li XL, Zhao YF, Yang HY, Wang ST (2013) Effect of triangular vacancy defect on thermal conductivity and thermal rectification in graphene nanoribbons. Phys Lett A 377:2141–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zandiatashbar A, Lee GH, An SJ, Lee S, Mathew N, Terrones M, Hayashi T, Picu CR, Hone J, Koratkar N (2014) Effect of defects on the intrinsic strength and stiffness of graphene. Nat Commun 5:3186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu ZC, Zhong WR (2014) Probability of self-healing in damaged graphene bombarded by fullerene. Appl Phys Lett 104:261907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu J, Shi D (2013) A possible self-healing mechanism in damaged graphene by heat treatment. Comput Mater Sci 68:391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galashev AY, Rakhmanova OR (2015) Computer simulation of the bombardment of a copper film on graphene with argon clusters. Chin Phys B 24:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao S, Xue J, Li L, Wang Y, Yan S (2012) Drilling nanopores in graphene with clusters: a molecular dynamics study. J Phys Chem C 116:11776–11782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li W, Li L, Zhao S, Zhang S, Xue J (2013) Fabrication of nanopores in a graphene sheet with heavy ions: a molecular dynamics study. J Appl Phys 114:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bellido EP, Seminario JM (2012) Molecular dynamics simulations of ion-bombarded graphene. J Phys Chem C 116:4044–4049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bai Z, Zhang L, Li H, Liu L (2016) Interfaces, nanopore creation in graphene by ion beam irradiation: geometry, quality and efficiency. ACS Appl Mater Int 8(37):24803–24809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bai Z, Lin Z, Ling L (2015) Bombarding graphene with oxygen ions: combining effects of incident angle and ion energy to control defect generation. J Phys Chem C 119:26793–26802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2009) The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev 39:228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mao S, Pu H, Chen J (2012) Graphene oxide and its reduction: modeling and experimental progress. ChemInform 2:2643–2662

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pei S, Cheng HM (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50:3210–3228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eda G, Chhowalla M (2010) Chemically derived graphene oxide: towards large-area thin-film electronics and optoelectronics. Adv Mater 22:2392–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brenner DW (1990) Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Phys Rev B 42:9458–9471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yao Z, Wang JS, Li B, Liu GR (2005) Thermal conduction of carbon nanotubes using molecular dynamics. Phys Rev B 71:085417

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51761004, 61264004, and 51661005), the Guizhou Province Science and Technology Fund (Grant No. J[2015] 2050, and [2017] 5788), and the Cooperation Project of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province (Grant No. LH[2016] 7430).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tinghong Gao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, J., Gao, T., Li, L. et al. Formation of defects during fullerene bombardment and repair of vacancy defects in graphene. J Mater Sci 54, 14431–14439 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03938-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03938-2

Navigation