Skip to main content
Log in

Application of explainable artificial intelligence for prediction and feature analysis of carbon diffusivity in austenite

  • Innovation in Materials Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon diffusivity in austenite is an important value in heat treatment, such as annealing and normalizing, for controlling the overall properties of steels. However, it is still a challenge to improve the model to more accurately predict the carbon diffusivity and analyze the features. Here, machine learning methods were employed to precisely predict carbon diffusivity and provide specific insights into prediction mechanisms of features. Shapley additive explanation method was employed to analyze the feature mechanisms. A total of 263 utilizable datasets were collected from the literature and analyzed, and three outliers were discarded. We then searched for hyperparameters using fivefold cross-validation and a grid search. Random forest regression (RFR) was selected based on the determination coefficient. The RFR was validated with an empirical equation using training, testing, and additional datasets. The importance and mechanisms of input features such as temperature, carbon concentration, Cr, Ni, Si, Al, Mn, and Mo were discussed using the calculation results of the Shapley value. Temperature had the greatest influence on carbon diffusivity, followed by carbon concentration, Cr, Si, Mo, Ni, Al, and Mn. Temperature, carbon concentration, Mo, Ni, and Mn increased carbon diffusivity but Cr, Si, and Al decreased carbon diffusivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Totten GE (2007) Steel heat treatment: metallurgy and technologies. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rajan TV, Sharma CP, Sharma A (2006) Heat treatment, principles and techniques. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  3. Speich GR, Demarest VA, Miller RL (1981) Formation of austenite during intercritical annealing of dual–phase steels. Met Trans A 12:1419–1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee S-J, Lee S, De Cooman BC (2011) Mn partitioning during the interciritical annealing of ultrafine–grained 6% Mn transformation–induced plasticity steel. Scripta 64:649–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeong MS, Park TM, Choi S, Lee S-J, Han J (2021) Recovering the ductility of medium–Mn steel by restoring the original microstructure. Scripta 190:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Cooman BC, Lee SJ, Shin S, Seo EJ, Speer JG (2016) Combined intercritical annealing and Q&P processing of medium Mn steel. Mat Mater Trans A 48:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3821-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S-J, Matlock DK, Van Tyne CJ (2011) An empirical model for carbon diffusion in austenite incorporating alloying element effects. ISIJ Int 51:1903–1911. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.51.1903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishtal MA (1970) Diffusion processes in iron alloys. Isr Progr Sci Transl Jerus 90:175–203

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith RP (1964) The diffusivity of carbon in–Fe–Co alloys. Trans AIME 230:476–480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ismail MI, Iskander SS, Saleh EB (1981) Surf Technol 12: 341–349. 0376–4883/81/0000–0000/$02.50

  11. Zhang X, Takahashi R, Akiyama T, Yagi J (1997) Carburization rate into solid iron at Co–CO2 atmosphere Tetsu–to–Hagané 83: 299–304. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.83.5_299

  12. Murakami T, Fukuyama H, Nagata K (2001) Mechanisms of carburization and melting of iron by CO gas. ISIJ Int 41:416–421. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.41.416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wells C, Batz W, Mehl RF (1950) Diffusion coefficient of carbon in austenite. Trans AIME 188:553–560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman LR, Radcliffe SV, Cohen M (1962) Decomposition of austenite by diffusional processes. Interscience Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tibbetts GG (1980) Diffusivity of carbon in iron and steels at high temperatures. J Appl Phys 51:4813–4816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Swetlana S, Khatavkar N, Singh AK (2020) Development of Vickers hardness prediction models via microstructural analysis and machine learning. J Mater Sci 55:15845–15856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05153-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang H, Fu H, He X, Wang C, Jiang L, Chen L-Q, Xie J (2020) Dramatically enhanced combination of ultimate tensile strength and electric conductivity of alloys via machine learning screening. Acta Mater 200:803–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eren B, Guvenc MA, Mistikoglu S (2021) Artificial intelligence applications for friction stir welding: a review. Met Mater Int 27:193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00854-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thankachan T, Prakash KS, Kavimani V, Silambarasan SR (2021) Machine learning and statistical approach to predict and analyze wear rates in copper surface composites. Met Mater Int 27:220–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00809-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y, Xu X (2021) Lattice misfit predictions via the Gaussian process regression for Ni-based single crystal superalloys. Met Mater Int 27:235–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00883-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee J-W, Park C, Lee BD, Park J, Goo NH, Sohn K-S (2021) A machine–learning–based alloy design platform that enables both forward and inverse predictions for thermo–mechanically controlled processed (TMCP) steel alloys. Sci Rep 11:11012–11029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90237-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeon J, Seo N, Kim H-J, Lee M-H, Lim H-K, Son SB, Lee S-J (2021) Inverse design of Fe-based bulk metallic glasses using machine learning. Metals 11:729–736. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeon J, Kim G, Seo N, Choi H, Kim H-J, Lee M-H, Lim H-K, Son SB, Lee S-J (2022) Combined data–driven model for the prediction of thermal properties of Ni-based amorphous alloys. J Mater Res Technol 16:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong D, Kwon S, Yim C (2021) Exploration of machine learning to predict hot ductility of cast steel from chemical composition and thermal conditions. Met Mater Int 27:298–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00713-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan F, Song K, Liu Y, Chen S, Chen J (2020) Predictions and mechanism analyses of the fatigue strength of steel based on machine learning. J Mater Sci 55:15334–15349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05091-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jeon J, Seo N, Son SB, Lee S-J, Jung M (2021) Application of machine learning algorithms and SHAP for prediction and feature analysis of tempered martensite hardness in low–alloy steels. Metals 11:1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lundberg SM, Lee SI (2017) A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. NIPS, Long Beach

  28. Shapley LS (1951) Notes on the N–person game II: the value of an N–person game. Technical Report for U.S. Air Force, Santa Monica

  29. Bhadeshia HKDH, Honeycombe R (2006) Steels: microstructure and properties. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kim K, Lee SJ (2017) Effect of Ni addition on the mechanical behavior of quenching and partitioning (Q&P) steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A 698:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.05.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology grant, funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0002019), as part of the Competency Development Program for Industry Specialists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seok-Jae Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Handling Editor: M. Grant Norton.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeon, J., Seo, N., Son, S.B. et al. Application of explainable artificial intelligence for prediction and feature analysis of carbon diffusivity in austenite. J Mater Sci 57, 18142–18153 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07538-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07538-5

Navigation