The Role of Simulation-Enabled Design Learning Experiences on Middle School Students’ Self-generated Inherence Heuristics
In science and engineering education, the use of heuristics has been introduced as a way of understanding the world, and as a way to approach problem-solving and design. However, important consequences for the use of heuristics are that they do not always guarantee a correct solution. Learning by Design has been identified as a pedagogical strategy that can guide individuals to properly connect science learning via design challenges. Specifically, we focus on the effect of simulation-enabled Learning by Design learning experiences on student-generated heuristics that can lead to solutions to problems. A total of 318 middle school students were exposed to a lesson that integrated design practices in the context of energy consumption and energy conservation considerations when designing buildings using an educational CAD tool. The students were pre- and posttested before and after the 2-week long intervention. The data analysis procedures combined qualitative with quantitative methods along with machine learning approaches. Our analysis revealed two distinct groups of students based on their learning achievement: the naive developing heuristic group and semi-knowledgeable fixated heuristic group. Differences between the groups are discussed in terms of performance, as well as implications for the use of computer simulations to improve student learning.
KeywordsScience learning Engineering design Computer simulations Quantitative study Heuristics
This research was funded by the US National Science Foundation under the award DRL #1503436.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent and parental consent were obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Brewer, W. F., & Samarapungavan, A. (1991). Children’s theories vs. scientific theories: differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge?Google Scholar
- D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., & Haertel, G. (2014). Simulations for STEM learning: systematic review and meta-analysis. Menlo Park: SRI International.Google Scholar
- Dasgupta, C., Magana, A. J., & Vieira, C. (2019). Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning. Computers and Education, 129, 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.014.
- Dede, C., Salzman, M. C., Loftin, R. B., & Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory immersion as a modeling environment for learning complex scientific concepts. Modeling and Simulation in Science and Mathematics Education, 282–319.Google Scholar
- Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. The nature of insight, 18, 365–395.Google Scholar
- Foundations: inquiry: thoughts, views, and strategies for the K-5 classroom (Vol. 1). Arlington: National_Science_Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., La Velle, L., … Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers & Education, 48(1), 137–152.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. L. (2002a). Facilitating the learning of design practices: lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 9–40.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. L. (2002b). Learning by design™: iterations of design challenges for better learning of science skills. Cognitive Studies, 9(3), 338–350.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In Proceedings from the proceedings of the international conference of the learning sciences.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., … Ryan, M. (2003a). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. L., Gray, J., & Fasse, B. B. (2003b). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3(2), 183–232.Google Scholar
- NSF. (2002). Foundations: A monograph for professionals in science, mathematics, and technology education. Inquiry. Thoughts, Views, and Strategies for the K-5 Classroom (Vol. 2). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
- Pearl, J. (1984). Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Rehn, D. A., Moore, E. B., Podolefsky, N. S., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2013). Tools for high-tech tool use: a framework and heuristics for using interactive simulations. Journal of teaching and learning with technology, 2(1), 31–55.Google Scholar
- Seah, Y. Y., & Magana, A. J. (2019). Exploring students’ experimentation strategies in engineering design using an educational CAD tool. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9757-x.
- Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick” authenticity: new media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195–215.Google Scholar
- Xie, C., Zhang, Z., Nourian, S., Pallant, A., & Hazzard, E. (2014). A time series analysis method for assessing engineering design processes using a CAD tool. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 218–230.Google Scholar
- Yellamraju, T., Magana, A. J., & Boutin, M. (2019). Investigating students’ habits of mind in a course on digital signal processing. To appear in IEEE Transactions on Education.Google Scholar