Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 814–823 | Cite as

The effects of priming subjective control on reports of fear

  • Martina KaufmannEmail author
  • Roland Neumann
Original Paper

Abstract

According to appraisal theories, fear-related emotions are essentially influenced by appraisals of personal control. Most appraisal theories propose that control appraisals automatically influence individuals’ fear responses, outside of their subjective awareness of that influence (Moors et al. Emot Rev 5:119–124, 2013). Providing empirical evidence for this idea, the current research showed that an unobtrusive manipulation of participants’ control appraisals via priming influenced their reports of fear-related emotions towards a subsequently presented threatening stimulus. In three studies, participants who were primed with a low degree of control in an ostensibly unrelated task reported more intense fear and anxiety toward the same stimulus compared with those who were primed with a high degree of control. This result generalized across different priming manipulations of subjective control and different threatening stimuli.

Keywords

Emotion Fear Anxiety Cognitive appraisals Subjective control 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures involving human participants were carried out in accordance with the Institution’s and/or National Research Committee’s ethical standards, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and subsequent amendments, or with comparable ethical standards.

Research involving human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgement of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., & Viscusi, D. (1981). Induced mood and the illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1129–1140.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.6.1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alloy, L. B., Kelly, K. A., Mineka, S., & Clements, C. M. (1990). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: A helplessness-hopelessness perspective. In J. D. Maser & C. R. Cloninger (Eds.), Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders (pp. 499–543). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baggett, H. L., Saab, P. G., & Carver, C. S. (1996). Appraisal, coping, task performance, and cardiovascular responses during the evaluated speaking task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 483–494.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). Studying the mind in the middle. A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & T. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). N.Y.: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). The development of anxiety: The role of control in the early environment. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.124.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Neubauer, D. H., Mauss, I. B., & Gross, J. J. (2002). Implicit anxiety measure predicts cardiovascular reactivity to an evaluated speaking task. Emotion, 2, 3–11.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531–542.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenkins, H. M., & Ward, W. C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 79, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufmann, M., Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., & Pekrun, R. (2018). Do positive illusions of control foster happiness. Emotion.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000499.Google Scholar
  17. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: Mc Graw Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2014). The situated interference, and the what, who, and where of priming. Social Cognition, 32, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandler, G., & Watson, D. L. (1966). Anxiety and the interruption of behavior. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 312–334). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Molden, D. C. (Ed.). (2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology: critiques, explanations, and an attempt at integration [Special issue]. Social Cognition, 32(Supplement), 1–249.Google Scholar
  22. Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the Artand future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neumann, R. (2000). The causal influences of attributions on emotions: A procedural priming approach. Psychological Science, 11, 179–182.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parkinson, B. (1997). Untangling the appraisal-emotion connection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 62–79.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 5. Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11–36). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 161–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisal of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rottenberg, J., Ray, R. D., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion elicitation using films. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 9–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sanderson, W. C., Rapee, R. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1989). The influence on an illusion of control on panic attacks induced via inhalation of 5.5% carbon dioxide-enriched air. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 157–162.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810020059010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X., & Philippot, P. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1153–1172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903274322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scherer, K. R. (1997). The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 902–922.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835–850.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Pattern of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). Pattern of cognitive appraisal in emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 475–488.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the “hot” cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 916–929.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, P. K., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Telch, M. J., Silverman, A., & Schmidt, N. B. (1996). Effects of anxiety sensitivity and perceived control on emotional responding to caffeine challenge. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 21–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6185(95)00032-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiech, K., Kalisch, R., Weiskopf, N., Pleger, B., Stephan, K. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Anterolateral prefrontal cortex mediates the analgesic effect of expected and perceived control over pain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11501–11509.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2568-06.2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zvolensky, M. J., Lejuez, C. W., & Eifert, G. H. (2000). Prediction and control: Operational definitions for the experimental analysis of anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 653–663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00090-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department I—PsychologyUniversity of TrierTrierGermany

Personalised recommendations