The effects of priming subjective control on reports of fear
According to appraisal theories, fear-related emotions are essentially influenced by appraisals of personal control. Most appraisal theories propose that control appraisals automatically influence individuals’ fear responses, outside of their subjective awareness of that influence (Moors et al. Emot Rev 5:119–124, 2013). Providing empirical evidence for this idea, the current research showed that an unobtrusive manipulation of participants’ control appraisals via priming influenced their reports of fear-related emotions towards a subsequently presented threatening stimulus. In three studies, participants who were primed with a low degree of control in an ostensibly unrelated task reported more intense fear and anxiety toward the same stimulus compared with those who were primed with a high degree of control. This result generalized across different priming manipulations of subjective control and different threatening stimuli.
KeywordsEmotion Fear Anxiety Cognitive appraisals Subjective control
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures involving human participants were carried out in accordance with the Institution’s and/or National Research Committee’s ethical standards, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and subsequent amendments, or with comparable ethical standards.
Research involving human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Alloy, L. B., Kelly, K. A., Mineka, S., & Clements, C. M. (1990). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: A helplessness-hopelessness perspective. In J. D. Maser & C. R. Cloninger (Eds.), Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders (pp. 499–543). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
- Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). Studying the mind in the middle. A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & T. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). N.Y.: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
- Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: Mc Graw Hill.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mandler, G., & Watson, D. L. (1966). Anxiety and the interruption of behavior. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 312–334). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Molden, D. C. (Ed.). (2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology: critiques, explanations, and an attempt at integration [Special issue]. Social Cognition, 32(Supplement), 1–249.Google Scholar
- Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 5. Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11–36). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rottenberg, J., Ray, R. D., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion elicitation using films. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 9–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sanderson, W. C., Rapee, R. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1989). The influence on an illusion of control on panic attacks induced via inhalation of 5.5% carbon dioxide-enriched air. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810020059010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiech, K., Kalisch, R., Weiskopf, N., Pleger, B., Stephan, K. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Anterolateral prefrontal cortex mediates the analgesic effect of expected and perceived control over pain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11501–11509. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2568-06.2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar