Abstract
According to appraisal theories, fear-related emotions are essentially influenced by appraisals of personal control. Most appraisal theories propose that control appraisals automatically influence individuals’ fear responses, outside of their subjective awareness of that influence (Moors et al. Emot Rev 5:119–124, 2013). Providing empirical evidence for this idea, the current research showed that an unobtrusive manipulation of participants’ control appraisals via priming influenced their reports of fear-related emotions towards a subsequently presented threatening stimulus. In three studies, participants who were primed with a low degree of control in an ostensibly unrelated task reported more intense fear and anxiety toward the same stimulus compared with those who were primed with a high degree of control. This result generalized across different priming manipulations of subjective control and different threatening stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgement of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441.
Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., & Viscusi, D. (1981). Induced mood and the illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.6.1129.
Alloy, L. B., Kelly, K. A., Mineka, S., & Clements, C. M. (1990). Comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders: A helplessness-hopelessness perspective. In J. D. Maser & C. R. Cloninger (Eds.), Comorbidity of mood and anxiety disorders (pp. 499–543). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York: Columbia University Press.
Baggett, H. L., Saab, P. G., & Carver, C. S. (1996). Appraisal, coping, task performance, and cardiovascular responses during the evaluated speaking task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225006.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). Studying the mind in the middle. A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & T. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). N.Y.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Barlow, D. H. (1988). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). The development of anxiety: The role of control in the early environment. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.124.1.3.
Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Neubauer, D. H., Mauss, I. B., & Gross, J. J. (2002). Implicit anxiety measure predicts cardiovascular reactivity to an evaluated speaking task. Emotion, 2, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.3.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150.
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212.
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.531.
Jenkins, H. M., & Ward, W. C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 79, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093874.
Kaufmann, M., Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., & Pekrun, R. (2018). Do positive illusions of control foster happiness. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000499.
Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2014). The situated interference, and the what, who, and where of priming. Social Cognition, 32, 137–151.
Mandler, G., & Watson, D. L. (1966). Anxiety and the interruption of behavior. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior (pp. 312–334). New York: Academic Press.
Molden, D. C. (Ed.). (2014). Understanding priming effects in social psychology: critiques, explanations, and an attempt at integration [Special issue]. Social Cognition, 32(Supplement), 1–249.
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the Artand future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165.
Neumann, R. (2000). The causal influences of attributions on emotions: A procedural priming approach. Psychological Science, 11, 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00238.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.
Parkinson, B. (1997). Untangling the appraisal-emotion connection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_5.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 5. Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11–36). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 161–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411034.
Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisal of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.899.
Rottenberg, J., Ray, R. D., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion elicitation using films. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 9–28). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sanderson, W. C., Rapee, R. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1989). The influence on an illusion of control on panic attacks induced via inhalation of 5.5% carbon dioxide-enriched air. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810020059010.
Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X., & Philippot, P. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1153–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903274322.
Scherer, K. R. (1997). The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 902–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.902.
Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016234.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Pattern of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). Pattern of cognitive appraisal in emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.475.
Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the “hot” cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.916.
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409189.
Smith, P. K., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.1.
Telch, M. J., Silverman, A., & Schmidt, N. B. (1996). Effects of anxiety sensitivity and perceived control on emotional responding to caffeine challenge. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6185(95)00032-1.
Wiech, K., Kalisch, R., Weiskopf, N., Pleger, B., Stephan, K. E., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Anterolateral prefrontal cortex mediates the analgesic effect of expected and perceived control over pain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11501–11509. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2568-06.2006.
Zvolensky, M. J., Lejuez, C. W., & Eifert, G. H. (2000). Prediction and control: Operational definitions for the experimental analysis of anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00090-X.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures involving human participants were carried out in accordance with the Institution’s and/or National Research Committee’s ethical standards, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and subsequent amendments, or with comparable ethical standards.
Research involving human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaufmann, M., Neumann, R. The effects of priming subjective control on reports of fear. Motiv Emot 43, 814–823 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09763-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09763-z