Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 135–141 | Cite as

Passive mixing rate of trapped squeezed nanodroplets—A time scale analysis

  • Alireza KarbalaeiEmail author
  • Hyoung J. Cho
Research Article


The elegance of digital microfluidics is in incorporating high quantities of manipulated micro and nanodroplets on-chip, each of which can be considered a small-volume carrier of various chemical and biological reagents. Therefore, the analysis of on-demand manipulation of these micro and nanocarriers is extremely important in developing an optimized lab on a chip. In this work, passive coalescence and mixing between two trapped, squeezed nanodroplets inside a closed microfluidic device was investigated. The droplets are composed of glycerol dyed in blue and red, dispersed inside oleic acid as the carrier oil. A microwell with a circular cross section was fabricated on the top wall of the microchannels to trap the first droplet for increasing the mixing precision and minimizing the viscous shear stress imposed on the droplets from the channel walls. The energy minimization theory was used to develop a parametric study for this trapping technique and to choose the optimum design parameters for droplet trapping in terms of efficiency. Image processing was performed on the snapshots of the trapped glycerol nanodroplets during mixing. Growth in passive mixing percentage was demonstrated to be asymptotical and was formulated with an empirical equation of exponential form as a function of the passive mixing relaxation time. The required time for the passive mixing of a glycerol droplet pair was measured considering various thresholds for the final standard deviation of the gray intensity indices. This finding was of the order of magnitude of the diffusive mixing time scale and physically consistent with the Stokes flow regime.


microfluidics droplet passive mix trap time scale 



Authors thank Saleheh Seif for guidance on image processing and statistical analysis and Lucille Serody for proofreading the manuscript.


  1. Abbyad, P., Dangla, R., Alexandrou, A., Baroud, C. N. 2011. Rails and anchors: Guiding and trapping droplet microreactors in two dimensions. Lab Chip, 11: 813–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamshad, A., Nikfarjam, A., Sabour, M. H. 2018. Capillary-based microoptofluidic viscometer. Meas Sci Technol, 29: 095901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamshad, A., Nikfarjam, A., Sabour, M. H., Raji, H. 2017. Theoretical and numerical investigation of liquid-gas interface location of capillary driven flow during the time throughout circular microchannels. In: Proceedings of the 5th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics, 432–438.Google Scholar
  4. Bithi, S. S., Vanapalli, S. A. 2010. Behavior of a train of droplets in a fluidic network with hydrodynamic traps. Biomicrofluidics, 4: 044110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bithi, S. S., Wang, W. S., Sun, M., Blawzdziewicz, J., Vanapalli, S. A. 2014. Coalescing drops in microfluidic parking networks: A multifunctional platform for drop-based microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics, 8: 034118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boukellal, H., Selimović, Š., Jia, Y. W., Cristobal, G., Fraden, S. 2009. Simple, robust storage of drops and fluids in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip, 9: 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bringer, M. R., Gerdts, C. J., Song, H., Tice, J. D., Ismagilov, R. F. 2004. Microfluidic systems for chemical kinetics that rely on chaotic mixing in droplets. Philos T Roy Soc A, 362: 1087–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, H., Fang, Q., Yin, X. F., Fang, Z. L. 2005. Microfluidic chip-based liquid-liquid extraction and preconcentration using a subnanoliter-droplet trapping technique. Lab Chip, 5: 719–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dangla, R., Lee, S., Baroud, C. N. 2011. Trapping microfluidic drops in wells of surface energy. Phys Rev Lett, 107: 124501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karbalaei, A., Cho, H. J. 2018. Microfluidic devices developed for and inspired by thermotaxis and chemotaxis. Micromachines, 9: 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karbalaei, A., Kumar, R., Cho, H. J. 2016. Thermocapillarity in microfluidics—A review. Micromachines, 7: 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paik, P., Pamula, V. K., Pollack, M. G., Fair, R. B. 2003. Electrowetting-based droplet mixers for microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 3: 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., Eliceiri, K. W. 2012. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods, 9: 671–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Song, H., Bringer, M. R., Tice, J. D., Gerdts, C. J., Ismagilov, R. F. 2003. Experimental test of scaling of mixing by chaotic advection in droplets moving through microfluidic channels. Appl Phys Lett, 83: 4664–4666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tan, W. H., Takeuchi, S. 2007. A trap-and-release integrated microfluidic system for dynamic microarray applications. P Natl Acad Sci USA, 104: 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tice, J. D., Lyon, A. D., Ismagilov, R. F. 2004. Effects of viscosity on droplet formation and mixing in microfluidic channels. Anal Chim Acta, 507: 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tice, J. D., Song, H., Lyon, A. D., Ismagilov, R. F. 2003. Formation of droplets and mixing in multiphase microfluidics at low values of the Reynolds and the capillary numbers. Langmuir, 19: 9127–9133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, W., Yang, C., Li, C. M. 2009. On-demand microfluidic droplet trapping and fusion for on-chip static droplet assays. Lab Chip, 9: 1504–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations