Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Women and Editorial Leadership of Scientific and Academic Journals: An Explorative Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics (IPAZIA 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The gender balance/imbalance in the governance of academic journals tied to the different scientific areas (i.e., the editorial board composition) represents a rather under investigated topic among the literature stream on diversity in top academic positions. Starting from this premise, the work aims to detect the gender (im)balance within the most prestigious international journals of Accounting. After having traced the theoretical background, the research design includes the empirical investigation focused on the Accounting journals ranked in the list proposed by the Association of Business Schools (ABS) in 2015 and included in the Italian ANVUR list (2017). Results confirm the underrepresentation of women in the editorial team and leadership positions of Accounting journals, as it happens in other fields included among the STEMs (such as Medicine or Math) or non-STEM disciplines (i.e., Management and Marketing). The work has scientific implications since it points out the limited potential of women scholars in covering governing roles and gaining worldwide visibility. Editorial board membership is in fact both a professional honour in recognition of achievements and an opportunity for professional advancement. Under an operational and political perspective, it contributes to nurturing the debate on the presence of an insidious discrimination that is often not easily recognized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chapter 7 of the report explores the comparative contribution of women and men in research as well as gaps in their funding success rates through several indicators of gender balance/imbalance in how research is conducted, such as women to men ratio of scientific authorships, women to men ratio in terms of the average of relative impact factors of their respective publications (when acting as corresponding author) and the proportion of international co-publications.

  2. 2.

    The journals are: The Accounting Review (TAR), Journal of Accounting Research (JAR), Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE), Accounting, Organization and Society (AOS), Accounting and Business Research (ABR) and Abacus (ABA).

References

  • ABS Guide. (2015). https://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2015/.

  • Addis, E., & Villa, P. (2003). The editorial boards of Italian Economics Journals: Women, gender, and social networking. Feminist Economics, 9(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570032000057062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amrein, K., Langmann, A., Fahrleitner-Pammer, A., Pieber, T. R., & Zollner-Schwetz, I. (2011). Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gender Medicine, 8(6), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genm.2011.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANVUR. (2017). Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca (National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes). Area 13 Elenco delle riviste di classe A valido per tutti i settori concorsuali dell’area. Pubblicato il 12 Maggio 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B. (2002). Challenging equal opportunities: Changing and adapting male hegemony in academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M.G., Del Baldo, M., & Vignini, S. (2016a). Pink accounting in Italy: Cultural perspectives over discrimination and/or lack of interest. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldarelli, M.G., Del Baldo, M., & Vignini, S. (2016b). Disuguaglianza di genere nel contesto accademico e universitario in Italia: il contributo delle studiose di Economia Aziendale, in Paoloni P. (a cura di), I mondi delle donne. Percorsi interdisciplinari, Edicusano, Roma, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. E., & Wright, O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender and Society, 14(2), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J. (1978). Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific fields. Sociological Quarterly, 19, 68–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, D. E. (1991). Environment still hostile to women in academe: New evidence indicates. Chronicle of Higher Education, October 9: A1–A20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borus, J. (2014). Editors and authors: Two halves of a whole. Academy Psychiatry, 38(2), 224–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J. (1995). The values of accounting and education: Some implications of the creation of visibilities and invisibilities’. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 6, 69–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J. (1998). The gendered nature of ‘accounting logic’: Pointers to an accounting that encompasses multiple values. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9, 267–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J. (2016). A gender agenda. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J., & Kirkham, L. (2008). Glass ceilings, glass cliffs or new worlds? Revisiting gender and accounting. Accounting and Accountability Journal, 21(4), 465–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac, G. (2012). Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 977–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas-Clavijo, A., Robinson-García, N., Escabias, M., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2013). Reviewers’ ratings and bibliometric indicators: Hand in hand when assessing over research proposals? PLoS ONE, 8(6), e68258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 3157–3162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, A.H., Johnson, S.A., Schuman, C.E., Adler, J.M., Gonzalez, O., Graves, S.J., Huebner, J.R., Marchant, D.B., Rifai, S.W., Skinner, I., & Bruna, E.M. (2014). Women are underrepresented on the editorial boards of journals in environmental biology and natural resource management. PeerJ, 2, e542; https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.542 PMID: 25177537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2, 217–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dambrin, C., & Lambert, C. (2006a). Le Plafond De Verre Dans Les Cabinets D’Audit—Questions Theoriques et Methodologiques, Post-Print halshs-00548047, Hal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dambrin, C., & Lambert, C. (2006b). La Question du Genre en Compatibilité. Analyses Theoriques et Metodologiques, Les Cahiers de Recherche, No. 862, HEC Paris, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickersin, K., Fredman, L., Flegal, K.M., Scott, J.D., & Crawley, B. (1998). Is there a sex bias in choosing editors? Epidemiology journals as an example. JAMA, 280(3), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drago, C., Amidani Aliberti, L., & Carbonai, D. (2014). Measuring gender differences in information sharing using network analysis: The case of the Austrian interlocking directorship network in 2009. Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei Nota di Lavoro, 61, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Gender in research and innovation. Statistics and indicators. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/shefigures-2012_en.pdf.

  • European Commission. (2014). Gender equality in Horizon 2020, Luxembourg. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/she_figures_2015-final.pdf. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/gender/h2020-hi-guide-gender_en.pdf.

  • European Commission. (2016). She figures 2015. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union, European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, C., Boden, R., Kent, J., & Tinson, J. (2007). Performing women: The gendered dimensions of the UK new researcher economy. Gender, Work and Organization, 14(5), 434–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, N. (2000). A case study of women academics’ views on equal opportunities, career prospects and work–family conflicts in a British university. Women in Management Review, 15(7), 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (p. 1991). New York, NY: WW Norton & Co Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. W., Burns, C. S., & Meyer, J. A. (2016). Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology, 30(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galley, H. F., & Colvin, L. A. (2013). Next on the agenda: Gender. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111, 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genova, A., De Micheli, B., Zucco, F., Grasso, C., & Magri, B. (2014). Achieving gender balance at the top of scientific research. Guidelines and tools for institutional change. Rome: Genis Lab project, Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollins, C. E., Shipman, A. R., & Murrell, D. F. (2017, June 3). A study of the number of female editors-in-chief of dermatology journals. International Journal Women’s Dermatology, 3(4), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. S., Fields, D. L., & Blum, T. C. (2003). Cracks in the glass ceiling. In what kinds of organizations do women make it to the top? Group and Organization Management, 28(4), 475–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K. (1998). The gender composition of editorial boards in economics. Royal Economic Society Women’s Committee. Available at http://www.res.org.uk/SpringboardWebApp/userfiles/res/file/WomensCommittee/Publications/editorialcomposition_Jan1999.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2018.

  • Hines, R. D. (1992). Accounting: Filling the negative space. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3/4), 313–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. G. (1987). Accounting and gender: An introduction. Accounting Organization and Society, 12(1), 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, J., Utzinger, J., & Singer, B. H. (2003). Gender composition of editorial boards of general medical journals. Lancet, 362, 1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14607-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, B. L., Lin, Y., & Dickstein, L. J. (2001, August). Women on the editorial boards of major journals. Academic Medicine, 76(8), 849–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, L. M. (1992). Integrating herstory and history in accountancy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3–4), 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamp, J. W. (2007). Perceptions of gender balance of IS journal editorial positions. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 124–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. A. (1995, June). Shaping the US academic accounting research profession: The American Accounting Association and the social construction of a professional élite. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. A. (1997). The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710158694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, C. (1992). “Herstory” in accounting: The first eighty years. Accounting Organization and Society, 17(3–4), 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. (1987). Women’s leadership status in the American Public Health Association. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 1537–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, D. (2016). The importance of a gender-balanced editorial team. Narrowing the gender gap begins with all of us Slow progress, pp. 1–3. www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/publishing-trends/The-importance-of-a-gender-balanced-editorial-team.

  • Mauleón, E., Hillán, L., Moreno, L., Gómez, I., & Bordons, M. (2013). Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members. Scientometrics, 95(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0824-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.47785472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. (2012). An update of gender diversity in editorial boards: A longitudinal study of management journals. Personnel Review, 41(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481211212940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, M. J., & Sonnad, S. S. (2007). Women on professional society and journal editorial boards. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99(7), 764–771. PMID: 17668642.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2004). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers (NSF Report 04-323). Arlington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2012). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2012 (NSF Report 14-305). Arlington, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2013). The composition of the editorial boards of general marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, First Published September 11, 2013 Research 36(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. H., Mullen, R. W., Thomason, W. E., & Phillips, S. B. (2006). Associate editor’s role in helping authors and upholding journal standards. Agronomy Journal, 98, 417–422. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. W. (2014). Where are the women editors? Academy Psychiatry, 38, 391–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0173-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala, E. (2008). Donne, uomini e potere. Disuguaglianze di genere in azienda, politica, accademia. Milano: F.Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, E., & Bosisio, R. (2007). The role of formal and informal rules in Italian Academics’ careers. Are there equal opportunities for men and women? In: R. Siemienska & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Gendered career trajectories in academia in cross national perspective (pp. 129–160). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrager, S., Bouwkamp, C., & Mundt, M. (2011, March). Gender and first authorship of papers in family medicine journals 2006–2008. Family Medicine, 43(3), 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siboni, B., Sangiorgi, D., Farneti, F., & de Villiers, C. (2016). Gender (in) accounting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, Special Issue, 24(2), 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, B.L., Spielmann, K.A., Shears, B., & Ohnersorgen, M. (1997). The gender effect on editorial boards and in academia. Bulletin of the Society for American Archeology, 15(4). Available at http://www.saa.org/Portals/0/SAA/publications/saabulletin/15-4/SAA6.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.

  • Stegmaier, M., Palmer, B., & van Assendelft, L. (2011). Getting on the board: The presence of women in political science journal editorial positions. Political Science and Politics, 44(04), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., West, J. D., & Larivière, V. (2015). The academic advantage: Gender disparities in patenting’. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0128000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teghtsoonian, M. (1974). Distribution by sex of authors and editors of psychological journals, 1970–1972: Are there enough women editors? American Psychologist, 29(4), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topaz, C. M., Sen, S., & Danforth, C. M. (2016). Gender representation on journal editorial boards in the mathematical sciences. PLoS ONE, 11(8), e0161357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. F., & Rogers, J. I. (1995, June). The accounting review and the production of accounting knowledge. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeverino-Gutiérrez, M. L., González-González, M. d. R., Corral-Symes, R., & González-Santiago, O. (2017). Women as editors-in-chief of environmental science journals. F1000Research, 2017(6), 1167. doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11661.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H., Cole, J., & Bruer, J. (Eds.). (1991). The outer circle. Women in the scientific community. New York: Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Society and Politics, University of Urbino, Via Saffi, 42, Urbino, Italy

    Mara Del Baldo

Authors
  1. Mara Del Baldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mara Del Baldo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Paola Paoloni

  2. Department Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Rosa Lombardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Del Baldo, M. (2019). Women and Editorial Leadership of Scientific and Academic Journals: An Explorative Study. In: Paoloni, P., Lombardi, R. (eds) Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics. IPAZIA 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00335-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation