Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

European Women on Boards and Corporate Sustainability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics (IPAZIA 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The promotion of gender balance in corporate boards is one of the tools in support of gender diversity in society as a whole. Data by EU Commission show a low, although increasing, representation of women on boards. The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of this situation, according to a managerial approach devoted to the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability goals of the UN 2030 Agenda. We carry out a descriptive analysis that supplements the existing public information about women on board with a secondary source of data, which contains information about boards of listed and unlisted European companies over a consistent period (2000–2016). We aim to read together different aspects concerning the presence of European women on boards, supporting the concept that a higher participation of women in top positions primarily depends on the corporate culture that goes beyond legal compliance. In the face of its limits, this work contributes to the existing literature about gender diversity and CSR in the achievement of the 2030 Agenda’s goals, highlighting the role that women on boards can have for a more sustainable world and encouraging the debate about first corporate jobs and career paths. Furthermore, this paper explores future lines of research into the selection procedures of board members and the creation of a more inclusive working environment, according to a more sustainable business approach by companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1983). Societal strategy for the business firm. Advances in Strategic Management, 1, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., & Crowter, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decisions, 46, 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett A., & Lukomnik, J. (2017). Age diversity within boards of directors of the S&P 500 companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2010). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies, 15(2), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Hegarty, H. W. (1999). Some determinants of student corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 38, 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camillus, J. C., & Datta, D. K. (1991). Managing strategic issues in a turbulent environment. Long Range Planning, 24(2), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business Society, 38, 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., Hoy, F., & Hall, J. (1987). The integration of social policy into strategic management. In P. S. Suresh & M. F. Cecilia (Eds.), Business and society: Dimensions of conflict and cooperation. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2017). Women on corporate boards: Do they advance corporate social responsibility? Human Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, A. (2012). Optimizing board effectiveness with gender diversity: Are quotas the answer? Global Corporate Governance Forum Publications, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Miller, K., & Serafeim, G. (2012). How to become a sustainable company. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(4), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibal with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt, N. L., & Werbel, J. D. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 96/694/EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Women in Economic Decision-making in the EU: Progress Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). GREEN PAPER—Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission COM. (2010). 78. A strengthened commitment to equality between women and men A women’s charter.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission COM. (2010). 491. Women on the Board Pledge for Europe’, European Pact for Gender Equality 2011–2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Database on women and men in decision-making, 2003–2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management and Organisation, 17(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gennari, F. (2016). Women on boards and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 12(4), 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms, competitive moves’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidrick & Struggles International. Towards dynamic governance (2014) http://www.heidrick.com/~/media/Publications%20and%20Reports/European-Corporate-Governance-Report-2014-Towards-Dynamic-Governance.pdf. Accessed June 2015.

  • Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(1), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krambia Kapardis, M. (2007). Women on boards: Dichotomizing the glass ceiling. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and the board of directors, Woking Paper, Toulouse School of Economics, France, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marz, J. W., Powers, T. L., & Queisser, T. (2003). Corporate and individual influences on managers’ social orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance, 1(2), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsens, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panwar, R., Hansen, E., & Anderson, R. (2010). Students’ perceptions regarding CSR success of the US forest products industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(1), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pletzer, J. L., Nikolova, R., Kedzior, K. K., & Voelpel, S. C. (2015). Does gender matter? Female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance-a meta-analysis. PLOS, 10(6).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 50(1), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, S. A. (2003). A flaw in the Sarbanes-Oxley reform: Can diversity in the boardroom quell corporate corruption? St John’s Law Review, 77, 838–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni, D. M., Franzoni, S., & Gennari, F. (2016a). Corporate governance systems and sustainability: CSR as a factor of convergence between outsider and insider systems. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni, D. M., Franzoni, S., & Gennari, F. (2017). Social responsibility as a factor of convergence in corporate governance. In G. Gal, O. Akisik, & W. Wooldridge (Eds.), Sustainability and social responsibility: Regulation and reporting. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni, D. M., Gennari, F., & Bosetti, L. (2016b). Sustainability and convergence: The future of corporate governance systems? Sustainability, 8(11), 1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shehata, N. F. (2013). How could board diversity influence corporate disclosure? Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 9(3), 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of management Issues, 9, 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. J., Wokutch, R. E., Harrington, V. K., & Dennis, B. S. (2001). An examination of the influence of diversity and stakeholder role on corporate social orientation. Business Society, 40(3), 266–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Basingstoke: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unesco. World Conference on Higher Education. Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century: Vision and Action. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001136/113601Eo.pdf. Accessed June 2015.

  • UN Global Compact. (2015). Guide to corporate sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M., & Were, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Buisness Ethics, 44, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Coffey, B. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. (2004). An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, B. E., & Patterson, K. (2006). An integrative definition of leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(2), 6–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley Era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, C.da S.Chiara, 50, Brescia, Italy

    Francesca Gennari

Authors
  1. Francesca Gennari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Gennari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Paola Paoloni

  2. Department Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Rosa Lombardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gennari, F. (2019). European Women on Boards and Corporate Sustainability. In: Paoloni, P., Lombardi, R. (eds) Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics. IPAZIA 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00335-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation