Skip to main content

Text Categorization for Authorship Attribution in English Poetry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing (SAI 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 858))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Authorship attribution could be considered as style-based text categorization problem. This paper presents an empirical study of performing style-based poetry categorization with the bag-of-words representation on 406 same theme English poems of five poets from World War I era. We investigated the impact of applying stop-words removal, stemming, and feature selection methods on the categorization performance of Support Vector Machine and Naïve Bayes Classifier. We found that these two models achieve best performance when stop-words removal and stemming are not applied on the training datasets, and the performance of Naïve Bayes Classifier is improved by performing feature selection methods. We also compared the best categorization performance of the bag-of-words representation with that of the stylometric representation including lexical features, such as function words and high frequency words, and found that the bag-of-words representation outperforms the stylometric representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed, A., Mohamed, R., Mostafa, B.: Machine learning for authorship attribution in Arabic poetry. Int. J. Future Comput. Commun. 6(2), 42–46 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Argamon, S., Levitan, S.: Measuring the usefulness of function words for authorship attribution. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the Association for Computers and the Humanities and the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing, pp. 1–3 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. “Ballad”, Victoria and Albert Museum, Online Museum. http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/f/forms-of-verse-ballad/

  4. Bozkurt, I.N., Baglioglu, O., Uyar, E.: Authorship attribution: performance of various features and classification methods. In: 22nd International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences, Ankara, Turkey, 7–9 November 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forman, G.: Choose your words carefully: An empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification, pp. 150–162. Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Function words list of 277 words. https://semanticsimilarity.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/jim-oshea-fwlist-277.pdf

  7. Fussell, P.: The Great War and Modern Memory. Oxford University Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holmes, D.I.: Authorship attribution. Comput. Humanit. 28, 87–106 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes, D.I.: The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship. Literary Linguist. Comput. 13(3), 111–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jamal, N., Mohd, M., Noah, S.: Poetry classification using support vector machines. J. Comput. Sci. 8(9), 1441–1446 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kao, J., Jurafsky, D.: A computational analysis of style, affect, and imagery in contemporary poetry. In: The Proceedings of Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, pp. 8–17 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan, D.M., Blei, D.M.: A computational approach to style in American poetry. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 553–558 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koppel, M., Akiva, N., Dagan, I.: Feature instability as a criterion for selecting potential style markers. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57(11), 1519–1525 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koppel, M., Schler, J., Bonchek-Dokow, E.: Measuring differentiability: unmasking pseudonymous authors. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 8, 1261–1276 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar, P.J., Reddy, G.S., Reddy, T.R.: Document weighted approach for authorship attribution. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Res. 13(7), 1653–1661 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lou, A., Inkpen, D., Tanasescu, C.: Multilabel subject-based classification of poetry. In: The Proceedings of 28th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pp. 187–192 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lovins, J.: Development of a stemming algorithm. Mech. Trans. Comput. Linguist. 11(01), 22–31 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mosteller, F., Wallace, D.: Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist. Addison-Wesley (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Osinalde, M., Astigarraga, A., Rodriguez, I., Agirrezabal, M.: Towards basque oral poetry analysis: a machine learning approach. In: The Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop Associated with RANLP, pp. 119–125 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ouamour, S., Sayoud, H.: Authorship attribution of ancient texts written by ten Arabic travelers using character N-grams. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems, pp. 1–5 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pradhan, S., Chhaya, N., Sahai, M.: Mining rhymes: poetry categorization using text mining in Weka (2014). unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ramezani, R., Sheydaei, N., Kahani, M.: Evaluating the effects of textual features on authorship attribution accuracy. In: The Proceedings of 3th International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 108–113 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rijsbergen, C.V.: Information Retrieval, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Roxas, R.M., Tapang, G.: Prose and poetry classification and boundary detection using word adjacency network analysis. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 21(04), 503–512 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. “Sonnet”, Victoria and Albert Museum, Online Museum. http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/f/forms-of-verse-sonnet

  27. Stamatatos, E.: A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 60(3), 538–556 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., Kokkinakis, G.: Computer-based authorship attribution without lexical measures. Comput. Hum. 35(2), 193–214 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stopwords list based on Rainbow. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mccallum/bow/rainbow/

  30. “Edward Thomas”, Poetry Foundation (2013). https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poets/detail/edward-thomas

  31. Weka 3: Data mining software in Java. http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Gallagher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gallagher, C., Li, Y. (2019). Text Categorization for Authorship Attribution in English Poetry. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Computing. SAI 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01174-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics