Skip to main content

Predicting Video Game Players’ Fun from Physiological and Behavioural Data

One Algorithm Does Not Fit All

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information and Communication Networks (FICC 2018)

Abstract

Finding a physiological signature of a player’s fun is a goal yet to be achieved in the field of adaptive gaming. The research presented in this paper tackles this issue by gathering physiological, behavioural and self-report data from over 200 participants who played off-the-shelf video games from the Assassin’s Creed series within a minimally invasive laboratory environment. By leveraging machine learning techniques the prediction of the player’s fun from its physiological and behavioural markers becomes a possibility. They provide clues as to which signals are the most relevant in establishing a physiological signature of the fun factor by providing an important score based on the predictive power of each signal. Identifying those markers and their impact will prove crucial in the development of adaptive video games. Adaptive games tailor their gameplay to the affective state of a player in order to deliver the optimal gaming experience. Indeed, an adaptive video game needs a continuous reading of the fun level to be able to respond to these changing fun levels in real time. While the predictive power of the presented classifier remains limited with a gain in the F1 score of 15% against random chance, it brings insight as to which physiological features might be the most informative for further analysis and discuss means by which low accuracy classification could still improve gaming experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Granic, I., Lobel, A., Engels, R.C.M.E.: The benefits of playing video games. Am. Psychol. 69(1), 66–78 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J.-P.: Classifying serious games: the G/P/S model. In: Handbook of Research on Improving Learning and Motivation Through Educational Games: Multidisciplinary Approaches, vol. 2005, pp. 118–136 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.M.: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 59(2), 661–686 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Entertainment Software Association. Essential facts about the computer and video game industry: Entertainment Software Association, p. 11 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bantinaki, K.: The paradox of horror: fear as a positive emotion. J. Aesthet. Art. Critic. 70(4), 383–392 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Den Hoogen, W., Poels, K., IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y.: Between challenge and defeat: repeated player-death and game enjoyment. Media Psychol. 15(4), 443–459 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mandryk, R.L., Inkpen, K.M., Calvert, T.W.: Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behav. Inform. Technol. 25(2), 141–158 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zook, A.E., Riedl, M.O.: A temporal data-driven player model for dynamic difficulty adjustment. In: Proceedings of the 8th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, AIIDE 2012, pp. 93–98 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wirth, W., Ryffel, F., Von Pape, T., Karnowski, V.: The development of video game enjoyment in a role playing game. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 16(4), 260–264 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desmet, P.: Measuring emotion: development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 111–123 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bartle, R.A.: Players who suit MUDs. Mud, p. 1 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychol. Behav. 9(6), 772–775 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yannakakis, G.N., Hallam, J.: Real-time game adaptation for optimizing player satisfaction. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 1(2), 121–133 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pedersen, C.: Modeling player experience through super Mario Bros supervisor Georgios Yannakakis, Technology, pp. 132–139, August 2009

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fairclough, S.H.: Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interact. Comput. 21(1–2), 133–145 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cacioppo, J.T., Tassinary, L.G., Berntson, G.G.: Psychophysiological science: interdisciplinary approaches to classic questions about the mind. In: Handbook of Psychophysiology, pp. 3–22 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson, M.D., Clore, G.L.: Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychol. Bull. 128(6), 934–960 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nacke, L.E.: An introduction to physiological player metrics for evaluating games. In: Seif El-Nasr, M., Drachen, A., Canossa, A. (eds.) Game Analytics, pp. 585–619. Springer, London (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Durantin, G., Gagnon, J.F., Tremblay, S., Dehais, F.: Using near infrared spectroscopy and heart rate variability to detect mental overload. Behav. Brain Res. 259, 16–23 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dehais, F., Causse, M., Vachon, F., Tremblay, S.: Cognitive conflict in human-automation interactions: a psychophysiological study. Appl. Ergonomics 43(3), 588–595 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rainville, P., Bechara, A., Naqvi, N., Damasio, A.R.: Basic emotions are associated with distinct patterns of cardiorespiratory activity. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 61(1), 5–18 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jang, E.-H., Park, B.-J., Park, M.-S., Kim, S.-H., Sohn, J.-H.: Analysis of physiological signals for recognition of boredom, pain, and surprise emotions. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 34, 1–12 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dekker, A., Champion, E.: Please Biofeed the Zombies: enhancing the gameplay and display of a horror game using biofeedback. In: Proceedings of DiGRA, pp. 550–558 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Emmen, D., Lampropoulos, G.: BioPong: adaptive gaming using biofeedback. In: Creating the Difference: Proceedings of the Chi Sparks 2014 Conference, no. 1, pp. 100–103 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chamberland, C., Grégoire, M., Michon, P.-E., Gagnon, J.-C., Philip, L.: A cognitive and affective neuroergonomics approach to game design. In: 59th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, no. 2007, pp. 1075–1079 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clerico, A., Chamberland, C., Parent, M., Michon, P.-E., Tremblay, S., Falk, T.H., Gagnon, J.-C., Jackson, P.: Biometrics and classifier fusion to predict the fun-factor in video gaming. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG 2016), pp. 233–240 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jennett, C., Cox, A.L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., Walton, A.: Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(9), 641–661 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yannakakis, G.N., Martínez, H.P.: Ratings are overrated!. Frontiers ICT 2(7), 5 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martinez, H.P., Yannakakis, G.N., Hallam, J.: Don’t classify ratings of affect; rank them!. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5(3), 314–326 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: reliable large-scale tree boosting system. arXiv, pp. 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The elements of statistical learning. Elements 1, 337–387 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This project was funded by NSERC-CRSNG, Ubisoft Québec and Prompt. Additional thanks to Nvidia for providing a video card for deep learning analysis through their GPU Grant Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexis Fortin-Côté .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fortin-Côté, A. et al. (2019). Predicting Video Game Players’ Fun from Physiological and Behavioural Data. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication Networks. FICC 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 886. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03402-3_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics