Abstract
Reforming STEM education in the United States continues to be a topic of active discussion and research. Why do some school districts succeed while others fail at implementing similar educational interventions? To answer this question, we apply the service science theory to characterize a pK-12 district that is viewed as a complex educational system. Our analysis utilizes the Service Science Canvas, which is a convenient methodological tool that includes common elements of the service science framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barile S, Polese F. Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Serv Sci. 2010;2:21–40.
Epstein J. School/Family/Community partnerships: caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan. 1995;76(9):701–12.
Greenwald R, Hedges L, Laine R. The effect of school resources on student achievement. Rev Educ Res. 1996;66(3):361–96.
Hanberger H.: Evaluation in local school governance: a framework for analysis. Educ Inq. 2016;7(3).
Hanushek E. Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1997;19(2):141–64.
Lyons K, Tracy S. Characterizing organizations as service systems. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind. 2013;23(1):19–27.
McCrone T, Southcott C, George N. Governance models in schools. Slough: NFER; 2011.
National Research Council: Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5: Condensed Version. The National Academies Press;2011.
National Center for Education Statistics (2016). Digest of Education Statistics; 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2016menu_tables.asp..
Pavlov O, Hoy F. Toward the service science of education. Handb Serv Sci. 2018;2.
Provasnik S, Malley L, Stephens M, Landeros K, Perkins R, Tang JH. Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS advanced 2015: mathematics and science achievement of U.S. students in grades 4 and 8 and in advanced courses at the end of high school in an international context (NCES 2017-002). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics;2018. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
Stecher BM et al. Improving teaching effectiveness: final report: the intensive partnerships for effective teaching through 2015–2016. RAND Corporation;2018. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2242.html.
Spohrer J, Anderson L, Pass N, Ager T. Service science and service-dominant language, vol. 2. Otago Forum 2: Academic Papers;2008. pp. 1–18.
Spohrer J, Giuisa A, Demirkan H, Ing D. Service science: reframing progress with universities. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2013;30:561–9.
Vargo S, Maglio P, Akaka M. On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur Manag J. 2008;26:145–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Weaver, S., Pavlov, O. (2019). Using the Service Science Canvas to Understand Institutional Change in a Public School System. In: Yang, H., Qiu, R. (eds) Advances in Service Science. INFORMS-CSS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04726-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04726-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04725-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04726-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)