Skip to main content

Project and Resource Optimization (PRO) for IT Service Delivery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Service Science (INFORMS-CSS 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 907 Accesses

Abstract

This paper identifies the needs and challenges of IT service project delivery. A hierarchical Project and Resource Optimization (PRO) architecture is presented to provide a comprehensive and systematic roadmap for coping with the decision needs at the strategic, tactical, operational and executional levels. We highlight the data-driven feature of PRO with emphasis on the modeling and algorithmic methdologies to provide dynamic and adaptive decision-support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson EG. The nonstationary staff-planning problem with business cycle and learning effects. Manage Sci. 2001;47(6):817–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. April J, Glover F, Kelly JP, Laguna M. Simulation-based optimization: practical introduction to simulation optimization. In: Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation. 2003. p. 71–78 (Winter Simulation Conference).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellman RE. Dynamic programming. New York: Courier Dover Publications; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertsekas DP, Bertsekas DP, Bertsekas DP, Bertsekas DP. Dynamic programming and optimal control, vol. 1. MA: Athena scientific Belmont; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bertsekas DP, Tsitsiklis JN, Wu C. Rollout algorithms for combinatorial optimization. J Heuristics. 1997;3(3):245–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Birge JR, Louveaux F. Introduction to stochastic programming. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao H, Hu J, Jiang C, Kumar T, Li TH, Liu Y, Lu Y, Mahatma S, Mojsilović A, Sharma M, et al. Onthemark: integrated stochastic resource planning of human capital supply chains. Interfaces. 2011;41(5):414–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CEB. The new model for it service delivery, volume i: design, definition and governance. Report, CIO Leadership Council, The Corporate Executive Board Company; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CEB. The future of corporate it: 2013–2017. The Corporate Executive Board. Company: Report; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheang B, Li H, Lim A, Rodrigues B. Nurse rostering problems–a bibliographic survey. Eur J Oper Res. 2003;151(3):447–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis MJ, Lu Y, Sharma M, Squillante MS, Zhang B. Stochastic optimization models for workforce planning, operations, and risk management. Serv Sci. 2018;10(1):40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Bruecker P, Van den Bergh J, Beliën J, Demeulemeester E. Workforce planning incorporating skills: state of the art. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;243(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ernst AT, Jiang H, Krishnamoorthy M, Sier D. Staff scheduling and rostering: a review of applications, methods and models. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;153(1):3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fogliatto FS, Da Silveira GJ, Borenstein D. The mass customization decade: an updated review of the literature. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;138(1):14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu MC. Optimization for simulation: theory vs. practice. INFORMS J Comput. 2002;14(3):192–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fu MC, Glover FW, April J. Simulation optimization: a review, new developments, and applications. In: Proceedings of the 37th conference on winter simulation. 2005. p. 83–95 (winter simulation conference).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gans N, Zhou YP. Managing learning and turnover in employee staffing. Oper Res. 2002;50(6):991–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garey MR, Johnson DS. Computers and intractability. A guide to the theory of np-completeness. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gass SI. Military manpower planning models. Comput Oper Res. 1991;18(1):65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gass SI, Collins RW, Meinhardt CW, Lemon DM, Gillette MD. Or practice the army manpower long-range planning system. Oper Res. 1988;36(1):5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glover F, Kochenberger G. Handbook of metaheuristics. Berlin: Springer; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gresh DL, Connors DP, Fasano JP, Wittrock RJ. Applying supply chain optimization techniques to workforce planning problems. IBM J Res Dev. 2007;51(3.4):251–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grinold R, Marshall K. Manpower planning models. Co: North-Holland Pub; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hillier FS. Introduction to operations research. New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang HC, Lee LH, Song H, Eck BT. Simmana simulation model for workforce capacity planning. Comput Oper Res. 2009;36(8):2490–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H, Santos CA, Fuciec A, Gonzalez MT, Jain S, Marquez C, Mejia C, Zhang A. Optimizing the labor strategy for professional service firms. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2018a (To appear).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li H, Santos CA, Lopez I. New models and methods for project portfolio optimization. Working paper, University of Missouri–St Louis. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li H, Vargas M, Santos CA, Ramshaw L, Lopez I, Perez S, Valencia C. Optimizing large-scale stochastic resource planning. Working paper, University of Missouri –St. Louis. 2018b.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li H, Womer K. Scheduling projects with multi-skilled personnel by a hybrid milp/cp benders decomposition algorithm. J Sched. 2009;12(3):281–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H, Womer K. Stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling and its military applications. MORS Phalanx. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Li H, Womer K. Solving stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problems by closed-loop approximate dynamic programming. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;246(1):20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nemhauser G, Wolsey L. Integer and combinatorial optimization. New York: Wiley; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinedo M. Planning and scheduling in manufacturing and services. Berlin: Springer; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Powell WB. Introduction to approximate dynamic programming. Approximate dynamic programming: solving the curses of dimensionality; 2011. p . 91–127.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Puterman ML. Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming. New york: Wiley; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Santos CA, Gonzalez MT, Li H, Chen KY, Beyer D, Biligi S, Feng Q, Kumar R, Jain S, Ramanujan R, Zhang A. Hp enterprise services uses optimization for resource planning. Interfaces. 2013;43(2):152–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schwindt C, Zimmermann J. Handbook on project management and scheduling. International handbooks on information systems, vol. 1&2. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Secomandi N. A rollout policy for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands. Oper Res. 2001;49(5):796–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Si J. Handbook of learning and approximate dynamic programming, vol. 2. New York: Wiley; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Simao HP, Day J, George AP, Gifford T, Nienow J, Powell WB. An approximate dynamic programming algorithm for large-scale fleet management: a case application. Transp Sci. 2009;43(2):178–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Solomon S, Li H, Womer K, Santos CA. Approximate dynamic programming for multi-period stochastic resource planning. Forthcoming in decision sciences, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sutton RS, Barto AG. Introduction to reinforcement learning, vol. 135. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Van den Bergh J, Beliën J, De Bruecker P, Demeulemeester E, De Boeck L. Personnel scheduling: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2013;226(3):367–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wren A. General review of the use of computers in scheduling buses and their crews. Computer scheduling of public transport; 1981. p. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yu G, Pachon J, Thengvall B, Chandler D, Wilson A. Optimizing pilot planning and training for continental airlines. Interfaces. 2004;34(4):253–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitao Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, H., Santos, C.A. (2019). Project and Resource Optimization (PRO) for IT Service Delivery. In: Yang, H., Qiu, R. (eds) Advances in Service Science. INFORMS-CSS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04726-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics