A Proposal of Dynamic Behaviour Design Based on Mode Shape Tracing: Numerical Application to a Motorbike Frame

  • Elvio BonisoliEmail author
  • Domenico Lisitano
  • Luca Dimauro
  • Lorenzo Peroni
Conference paper
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)


A modal based method to design and to improve the dynamic behaviour of flexible multibody systems is proposed in this paper. The dynamic behaviour of a flexible multibody system depends on the dynamics of its components and on the effects of the connections. When dynamics problems are experienced in particular working conditions, changes to the design are required. Usually connections are standard and there is not space for changes, therefore the components should be improved. Changes at components level improve the global system behaviour, but it is not so easy to identify the most effective component for each specific case. The purpose of the proposed method is to identify the most influent components in specific working frequency ranges of a multibody system. The method is based on a hierarchical procedure from assembly to components which leads to the identification of the components to be modified in order to improve assembly performance.

The method is applied to a whole motorbike frame, a multibody system with comparable components stiffnesses. Numerical modal analysis is performed on the full assembly with connections, front and rear sub-assemblies and on single components: chassis, swingarm, engine and wheel.

The method is applied to the selection of the most influent components mode shapes in the motorbike behaviour during manoeuvres at high velocity. The selected components are the most suitable for structural, geometric and material modifications to effectively improve the global motorbike behaviour, performances and driveability.


Flexible multibody dynamic Numerical modal analysis Motorbike dynamics Components dynamic design Weighted mode shape 


  1. 1.
    Allemang, R.J., Brown, D.L.: A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In: Proceedings of 1st IMAC, pp. 110–116. Orlando, FL (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonisoli, E., Marcuccio, G., Rosso, C.: Crossing and veering phenomena in crank mechanism dynamics. In: Proceedings of 31th IMAC, pp. 175–187. Garden Grove, CA (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharp, R.S., Limebeer, D.J.N.: A motorcycle model for stability and control analysis. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 6(2), 123–142 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cossalter, V., Lot, R.: A motorcycle multi-body model for real time simulations based on the natural coordinates approach. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 37(6), 423–447 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharp, R.S., Evangelou, S., Limebeer, D.J.N.: Advances in the modelling of motorcycle dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 12, 251–283 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leonelli, L., Mancinelli, N.: A multibody motorcycle model with rigid-ring tyres: formulation and validation. Int. J. Veh. Mech. Mobil. 53(6), 775–797 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sequenzia, G., Olivieri, S.M., Fatuzzo, G., Calì, M.: An advanced multibody model for evaluating rider’s influence on motorcycle dynamics. J. Multibody Dyn. 229(2), 193–207 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olivieri, S.M., Calì, M., Catalano, L.: Dynamics of motorcycle using flexible elements. In: International Design Conference, pp. 1227–1236. Dubrovnik, Croatia (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferretti, G., Scaglioni, B., Rossi, A.: Multibody model of a motorbike with a flexible swingarm. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Modelica Conference, pp. 273–282. Lund, Sweden (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bocciolone, M., Cheli, F., Pezzola, M., Viganò, R.: Static and dynamic properties of a motorcycle frame: experimental and numerical approach. Trans. Model. Simul. 41, 517–526 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lake, K., Thomas, R., Williams, O.: The influence of compliant chassis components on motorcycle dynamics: an historical overview and the potential future impact of carbon fibre. Int. J. Veh. Mech. Mobil. 50(7), 1043–1052 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cossalter, V.: Motorcycle Dynamics. Lulu, Morrisville (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonisoli, E., Lisitano, D., Dimauro, L.: Experimental and numerical mode shape tracing from components to whole motorbike chassis. In: International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA, pp. 1–8. Leuven, Belgium, September 17–19 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ibrahim, S.R., Sestieri, A.: Existence and normalization of complex modes in post experimental use in modal analysis. In: Proceedings of 13th IMAC, pp. 483–489 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vacher, P., Jacquier, B., Bucharles, A.: Extension of the MAC criterion to complex modes. In: International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA, pp. 2713–2725. Leuven, Belgium (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cossalter, V., Doria, A., Massaro, M., Taraborrelli, L.: Experimental and numerical investigation on the motorcycle front frame flexibility and its effect on stability. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 60–61, 452–471 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cocco, G.: Dinamica e tecnica della motocicletta. Giorgio Nada Editore, Milan (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elvio Bonisoli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Domenico Lisitano
    • 1
  • Luca Dimauro
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Peroni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations