Skip to main content

eSense 2.0: Modeling Multi-agent Biomimetic Predation with Multi-layered Reinforcement Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information and Communication (FICC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 70))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1502 Accesses

Abstract

Learning in multi-agent systems, especially with adversarial behavior being exhibited, is difficult and challenging. The learning within these complicated environments is often muddied by the multitudinous conflicting or poorly correlated data coming from the multiple agents and their diverse goals. This should not be compared against well-known flocking-type behaviors where each agent has the same policy; rather, in our scenario each agent may have their own policy, sets of behaviors, or overall group strategy. Most learning algorithms will observe the actions of the agents and inform their algorithm which seeks to form the models. When these actions are consistent a reasonable model can be formed; however, eSense was designed to work even when observing complicated and highly-interactive must-agent behavior. eSense provides a powerful yet simplistic reinforcement learning algorithm that employs model-based behavior across multiple learning layers. These independent layers split the learning objectives across multiple layers, avoiding the learning-confusion common in many multi-agent systems. We examine a multi-agent predator-prey biomimetic sensing environment that simulates such coordinated and adversarial behaviors across multiple goals. This work could also be applied to theater wide autonomous vehicle coordination, such as that of the hierarchical command and control of autonomous drones and ground vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ammari Habib, T.B., Garnier, J.: Modeling active electrolocation in weakly electric fish. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 6(1), 285–321 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Batista, G.E.A.P.A., Prati, R.C., Monard, M.C.: A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 6(1), 20–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1007730.1007735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer, F., et al.: Model for a sensor inspired by electric fish. IEEE Trans. Robot. 28(2), 492–505 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coggan, M.: Exploration and Exploitation in Reinforcement Learning, 3(3), p. 1448. CRA-W DMP Project at McGill University, Scholarpedia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Franklin, D.M.: Strategy inference in stochastic games using belief networks comprised of probabilistic graphical models. In: Proceedings of FLAIRS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franklin, D.M., Martin, D.: eSense: BioMimetic modeling of echolocation and electrolocation using homeostatic dual-layered reinforcement learning. Proc. ACM SE 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freedman, H., Waltman, P.: Persistence in models of three interacting predator-prey populations. Math. Biosci. 68(2), 213–231 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopkins, C.D.: Electroreception: Passive Electrolocation and the Sensory Guidance of Oriented Behavior. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hussein, S.: Predator-prey modeling. Undergraduate J. Math. Model.: One + Two 3(1), 32 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lima, S.L.: Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17(2), 70–75 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shieh, K.T., et al.: Short-range orientation in electric fish: an experimental study of passive electrolocation. J. Exp. Biol. 199(11), 2383–2393 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, Chaps. 4, 5, 8 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor, M.E., Whiteson, S., Stone, P.: Comparing evolutionary and temporal difference methods in a reinforcement learning domain. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woergoetter, F., Porr, B.: Reinforcement learning. Scholarpedia 3(3), 1448 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi, F., Wei, J., Shi, J.: Bifurcation and spatiotemporal patterns in a homogeneous diffusive predatorprey system. J. Differ. Equ. 246(5), 1944–1977 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2008.10.024, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022039608004373

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Michael Franklin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Michael Franklin, D., Martin, D. (2020). eSense 2.0: Modeling Multi-agent Biomimetic Predation with Multi-layered Reinforcement Learning. In: Arai, K., Bhatia, R. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 70. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12385-7_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics