Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inquiries Following Crises

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Crises, Inquiries and the Politics of Blame

Abstract

Within the blame game literature, appointing an inquiry is often mentioned as a way to deal with blame. Much more, however, can be said about inquiries—hence this chapter. Starting with why inquiries are appointed following a crisis and how they could be used to manage the crisis’ political fallout, the chapter proceeds to address how actors can try to influence the inquiry. So-called catalytic inquiries, however, can be quite independent and influential; publishing reports that cannot be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jenkins, S. (2002, 2 April). A tragedy of errors. The Times, Section News, p. 2.

References

  • Boin, A. (2009). The new world of crises and crisis management: Implications for policymaking and research. Review of Policy Research, 26(4), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management. Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boudes, T., & Laroche, H. (2009). Taking off the heat: Narrative sensemaking in post-crisis inquiry reports. Organization Studies, 30(4), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M., ’t Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2008). The politics of policy evaluation. In R. E. Goodin, M. Moran, & M. Rein (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 319–335). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548453.003.0015.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brändström, A. (2016). Crisis, accountability and blame management. Strategies and survival of political office-holders (Vol. 44). Stockholm: CRISMART.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brändström, A., & Kuipers, S. (2003). From ‘normal incidents’ to political crises: Understanding the selective politicization of policy failures. Government and Opposition, 38(3), 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D. (2000). Making sense of inquiry sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D. (2003). Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organization Studies, 25(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D. (2005). Making sense of the collapse of Barings Bank. Human Relations, 58(12), 1579–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1983). Introduction. Commissions as instruments for policy research. American Behavioral Scientist, 26(5), 559–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, T. J. (1975). Royal commissions and departmental committees in Britain. A case-study in institutional adaptiveness and public participation in government. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. A. (1973). Commissions in policy-making. In R. A. Chapman (Ed.), The role of commissions in policy-making (pp. 174–188). London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D., & McGuinness, M. (2002). Public inquiry: Panacea or placebo? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, R. P., Jr. (1992). Sensemaking, communicative distortion and the logic of public inquiry legitimation. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 6(2), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, G. (2002). Royal commissions of inquiry. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 35(3), 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell, H. F. (1934). British royal commissions of inquiry. Political Science Quarterly, 49(1), 84–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry. (2016). Terms of reference. Retrieved March 1, 2017, from https://www.hiainquiry.org/terms-reference.

  • Hogwood, B., & Gunn, L. (1993). Why ‘perfect implementation’ is unattainable. In M. Hill (Ed.), The policy process: A reader (pp. 238–247). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R. (2003). Drinking water contamination in Walkerton, Ontario: Positive resolutions from a tragic event. Water Science and Technology, 47(3), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1991). Inquiry by her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Prisons into the escape of two category ‘A’ prisoners from her Majesty’s prison Brixton on 7 July 1991. Text of parts of the report being made public. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., Jennings, W., Dixon, R., Hogwood, B., & Beeston, C. (2009). Testing times: Exploring staged responses and the impact of blame management strategies in two examination fiasco cases. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 695–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, G. (1999). The management of public inquiries. The Political Quarterly, 70(3), 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, B. M. (1992). Public accident inquiries: The case of the railway inspectorate. Public Administration, 70(2), 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, M. (2001). How does an inquiry inquire? A brief note on the working methods of the Bristol royal infirmary inquiry. Journal of Law and Society, 28(4), 590–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. (2003). Overview: Crisis management, influences, responses and evaluation. Parliamentary Affairs, 56(3), 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success. Rethinking public policy. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. (2011). Success? Failure? Something in-between? A framework for evaluating crisis management. Policy and Society, 30(2), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, I., & Johnes, M. (2000). ‘Regulation run mad’: The board of trade and the loss of the Titanic. Public Administration, 78(4), 729–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1992). Following Woolf: The prospects for prisons policy. Journal of Law and Society, 19(2), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1997). Imprisonment: Current concerns and a brief history since 1945. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (2nd ed., pp. 1137–1194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, D. R. (2002). Part one. Report of the Walkerton inquiry: The events of May 2000 and related issues. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (1997). Implementing public innovations in network settings. Administration & Society, 29(2), 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Player, E., & Jenkins, M. (1994). Introduction. In E. Player & M. Jenkins (Eds.), Prisons after Woolf. Reform through riot (pp. 1–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasser, S. (1994). Royal commissions and public inquiries: Scope and uses. In P. Weller (Ed.), Royal commissions and the making of public policy (pp. 1–21). South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 89–107). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransley, J. (1994). The powers of royal commissions and controls over them. In P. Weller (Ed.), Royal commissions and the making of public policy (pp. 22–31). South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resodihardjo, S. L. (2006). Wielding a double-edged sword: The use of inquiries at times of crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(4), 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resodihardjo, S. L. (2009). Crisis and change in the British and Dutch prison services. Understanding crisis-reform processes. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G. (1975). Committees of inquiry. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (1994). Problem definition: An emerging perspective. In D. A. Rochefort & R. W. Cobb (Eds.), The politics of problem definition. Shaping the policy agenda (pp. 1–31). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedley, S. (1989). Public inquiries: A cure or a disease? The Modern Law Review, 52(4), 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. C. (1978). Commissions of inquiry and the policy process. In S. Levine (Ed.), Politics in New Zealand. A reader (pp. 22–35). Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, L. (2004). Resisting neo-liberalism: The poisoned water disaster in Walkerton, Ontario. Social & Legal Studies, 13(2), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, B. (1994). Success in public inquiries: An analysis and a case study. In P. Weller (Ed.), Royal commissions and the making of public policy (pp. 244–258). South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2006). If they get it right: An experimental test of the effects of the appointment and reports of UK public inquiries. Public Administration, 84(3), 623–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2007). Scything the grass: Agenda-setting consequences of appointing public inquiries in the UK. A longitudinal analysis. Policy & Politics, 35(4), 629–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2010). Reflection in the shadow of blame: When do politicians appoint commissions of inquiry? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 613–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R., & Holzman-Gazit, Y. (2016). Form and content: Institutional preferences and public opinion in a crisis inquiry. Administration & Society, 48(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Duin, M., Wijkhuijs, V., & Jong, W. (2013). Leren van dilemma’s: Rode draden uit de casus [Learning from dilemmas. Most important issues from the cases]. In M. van Duin, V. Wijkhuijs, & W. Jong (Eds.), Lessen uit crises en mini-crises 2012 (pp. 9–34). Den Haag: Boom Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, P. (1994a). Preface. In P. Weller (Ed.), Royal commissions and the making of public policy (pp. ix–xii). South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, P. (1994b). Royal commissions and the governmental system in Australia. In P. Weller (Ed.), Royal commissions and the making of public policy (pp. 259–266). South Melbourne: Macmillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, D. (1995). Matrix Churchill: A case study in judicial inquiries. Parliamentary Affairs, 48(1), 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolf. (1991). Prison disturbances April 1990. Report of an inquiry by the Rt Hon Lord Justice Woolf (Parts I and II) and his honour Judge Stephen Tumim (Part II). London: HMSO, Cm 1456.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Sandra L. Resodihardjo

Authors
  1. Sandra L. Resodihardjo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra L. Resodihardjo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Resodihardjo, S.L. (2020). Inquiries Following Crises. In: Crises, Inquiries and the Politics of Blame. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17531-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation