Advertisement

New Tuning Formulas: Genetic Algorithm Used in Air Conditioning Process with PID Controller

  • Xiaoli Qin
  • Hao Li
  • Weining An
  • Hang Wu
  • Weihua Su
Conference paper
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

In this paper, a new tuning formula is proposed for PID controller in air conditioning processes, which is often used in engineering practice. A qualified controller should achieve a good balance between system performance and robustness. In this study, the set-point following and attenuation of load disturbances are decoupled by using two degrees-of-freedom control structure and the ability to reject load disturbances to the robustness constraints is maximized by optimization algorithms. A novel scheme is adopted in the derivation of the new tuning formulas that can be much simpler and easier with similar control performance compared to complex optimization algorithms. The simulation results are given to demonstrate their feasibility and effectiveness.

Keywords

PID control Load disturbance attenuation Robustness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by the AMMS Youth Innovation Foundation No. 2017CXJJ09.

References

  1. 1.
    Koivo, H. N., & Tanttu, J. T. (1991). Tuning of PID controllers: Survey of Siso and Mimo techniques. In Intelligent tuning and adaptive control (pp. 75–80). Singapore: IFAC Intelligent Tuning Adaptive Control Symposium.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ingimundarson, A., & Hägglund, T. (2002). Performance comparison between PID and dead-time compensating controllers. Journal of Process Control, 12(8), 887–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Åström, K. J., & Hägglund, T. (2001). The future of PID control. Control Engineering Practice, 9(11), 1163–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yamamoto, S. (1991). Present status and future needs: The view from Japanese industry. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Chemical Process Control-CPC IV, CACHE-AIChE (pp. 1–28).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Åström, K. J., & Hägglund, T. (1995). PID controllers: Theory, design and tuning. Research Triangle Park: Instrument Society of America.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ziegler, J. G. (1942). Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Transactions of the ASME, 64(2B), 759–768.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Åström, K. J., & Hägglund, T. (2004). Revisiting the Ziegler–Nichols step response method for PID control. Journal of Process Control, 14(6), 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Åström, K. J., & Hägglund, T. (2006). Advanced PID control. Research Triangle Park: ISA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hägglund, T., & Åström, K. J. (2010). Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for pi control. Asian Journal of Control, 6(4), 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chilali, M., & Gahinet, P. (1996). H∞ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41(3), 358–367.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shih, Y., & Chen, C. (1974). On the weighting factors of the quadratic criterion in optimal control. International Journal of Control, 19(5), 947–955.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skogestad, S. (2003). Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. Journal of Process Control, 13(4), 291–309.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panagopoulos, H. (1998). Design of PI controllers based on non-convex optimization. Oxford: Pergamon Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gen, M., & Cheng, R. (2000). Genetic algorithms and engineering optimization (Vol. 7). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoli Qin
    • 1
  • Hao Li
    • 1
  • Weining An
    • 1
  • Hang Wu
    • 1
  • Weihua Su
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Medical EquipmentTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations