Advertisement

An Introduction to Formation Control of UAV with Vicon System

  • Yangguang Yu
  • Zhihong Liu
  • Xiangke WangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing book series (EAISICC)

Abstract

As a first step towards fully distributed formation control for a large swarm, we exhibit a distributed flight demo with three quadcopters under Vicon motion capture system. In this paper, hardware setup of system and a decentralized software architecture are introduced. Then, in order to validate the system, we design an experiment in which three quadcopters circle around a fixed point coordinately by using the consensus protocol. Finally, some flight data are reported and analyzed.

Keywords

Formation control Vicon system System architecture 

References

  1. 1.
    Ren, W., & Atkins, E. (2007). Distributed multi-vehicle coordinated control via local information exchange. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 17(10–11), 1002–1033.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coogan, S., & Arcak, M. (2012). Scaling the size of a formation using relative position feedback. Automatica, 48(10), 2677–2685.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hendrickx, J. M. Anderson, B., Delvenne, J. -C., & Blondel, V. D. (2007). Directed graphs for the analysis of rigidity and persistence in autonomous agent systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 17(10–11), 960–981.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ren, W., Beard, R. W., & Atkins, E. M. (2007). Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 27(2), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao, S., & Zelazo, D. (2016). Bearing rigidity and almost global bearing-only formation stabilization. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 61(5), 1255–1268.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kushleyev, A., Mellinger, D., Powers, C., & Kumar, V. (2013). Towards a swarm of agile micro quadrotors. Autonomous Robots, 35(4), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Preiss, J. A., Hönig, W., Sukhatme, G. S., & Ayanian, N. (2017). Crazyswarm: A large nano-quadcopter swarm. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Piscataway: IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas, J., Polin, J., Sreenath, K., & Kumar, V. (2013). Avian-inspired grasping for quadrotor micro UAVs. In ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grabe, V., Bülthoff, H. H., & Giordano, P. R. (2012). On-board velocity estimation and closed-loop control of a quadrotor UAV based on optical flow. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 491–497). Piscataway: IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santos, F., Almeida, L., Pedreiras, P., Lopes, L. S., & Facchinetti, T. (2004). An adaptive TDMA protocol for soft real-time wireless communication among mobile autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Architecture for Cooperative Embedded Real-Time Systems, WACERTS, vol. 2004 (pp. 657–665).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechatronics and AutomationNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaP. R. China

Personalised recommendations