Skip to main content

Research into the Adaptability Evaluation of the Remote Sensing Image Fusion Method Based on Nearest-Neighbor Diffusion Pan Sharpening

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover 2nd EAI International Conference on Robotic Sensor Networks

Abstract

Nearest-neighbor diffusion pan sharpening, as a new image fusion method based on nearest-neighbor diffusion, has become a new hot spot of research. In this paper, the nearest-neighbor diffusion pan sharpening method is used for a WorldView-2 image fusion experiment and compared with the methods we usually use such as the wavelet transform fusion method, the PCA transform fusion method, and the Gram–Schmidt transform fusion method. The experimental results show that the spatial information is better than the other three methods in terms of spatial details and texture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu, Z., Blasch, E., & John, V. (2017). Statistical comparison of image fusion algorithms: Recommendations. Information Fusion, 36, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huimin, L., Li, Y., Shota, N., Hyongseop, K., & Seiichi, S. (2013). Principles and methods of remote sensing application analysis. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, C., Qin, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2011). Comparison of quality evaluation methods for image fusion of farmland remote sensing. Transactions of the CSAE, 27(10), 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, L., Niu, X., Wei, B., et al. (2015). Study on quality evaluation methods for remotely sensed images fusion. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2, 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Y., Lu, H., Li, J., et al. (2016). Underwater image de-scattering and classification by deep neural network. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 54, 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, H., Li, Y., Nakashima, S., et al. (2016). Turbidity underwater image restoration using spectral properties and light compensation. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 99(1), 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu, H., Li, Y., Zhang, L., & Serikawa, S. (2015). Contrast enhancement for images in turbid water. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 32(5), 886–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu, H., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2017). Underwater optical image processing: A comprehensive review. Mobile Networks and Applications, 22(6), 1204–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, M., Hao, Y., Qiu, M., et al. (2016). Mobility-aware caching and computation offloading in 5G ultra-dense cellular networks. Sensors, 16, 974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, M., Yang, J., Hao, Y., et al. (2017). A 5G cognitive system for healthcare. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc1010002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, M., Shi, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2017). Deep feature learning for medical image analysis with convolutional autoencoder neural network. IEEE Transactions on Big Data. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2017.2717439

  12. Sun, W., & Messinger, D. (2014). Nearest-neighbor diffusion-based pan-sharpening algorithm for spectral images. Optical Engineering, 53(1), 013107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shannon, C. E. (2014). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodgers, J. L., & Nicewander, W. A. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42(1), 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz, M. H., & Rozumalski, A. (2008). The gait deviation index: A new comprehensive index of gait pathology. Gait and Posture, 28(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bennis, D., Garcia Rozas, J. R., & Oyonarte, L. (2016). Relative Gorenstein global dimension. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, 26(8), 1597–1615.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the key research project fund of the Institution of Higher Education in Henan Province (18A420001), the Henan Polytechnic University Doctoral Fund (B2016-13), and The Open Program of the Collaborative Innovation Center of Geo-Information Technology for Smart Central Plains, Henan Province (2016A002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, C., Shao, W., Lu, H., Zhang, H., Wang, S., Yue, H. (2020). Research into the Adaptability Evaluation of the Remote Sensing Image Fusion Method Based on Nearest-Neighbor Diffusion Pan Sharpening. In: Lu, H., Yujie, L. (eds) 2nd EAI International Conference on Robotic Sensor Networks. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17763-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17763-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17762-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17763-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics