Skip to main content

Robots in Healthcare: A Survey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 944))

Abstract

Advances in robotic technology is stimulating growth in new treatment mechanism by enhancing patient outcomes and helping reduce healthcare costs, while providing alternate care apparatus. Provision of care by assistive therapeutic robots has increasingly grown in the past decade. Although the healthcare industry has been lagging in the use of assistive robots; the use of assistive robots in the manufacturing industry has been a norm for a long time. The vulnerable population of patients with illnesses, cognition challenges, and disabilities are some of the causes for the delay in the use of assistive therapeutic robots in healthcare. In this paper we explore the various types of assistive robots and their use in the healthcare industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rabbitt, S.M., Kazdin, A.E., Scassellati, B.: Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 35, 35–46 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001. ISSN 0272-7358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fasola, J., Mataric, M.: A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 2(2), 3–32 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vänni, K.J., Salin, S.E.: A need for service robots among health care professionals in hospitals and housing services. In: International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Prange, G.B., Jannink, M.J., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G., Hermens, H.J., Ijzerman, M.J.: Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43, 171–183 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Aisen, M.L., Hogan, N.: Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37(6), 639–652 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reinkensmeyer, D.J., Kahn, L.E., Averbuch, M., McKenna-Cole, A., Schmit, B.D., Rymer, W.Z.: Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 37(6), 653–662 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(4), 319 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diehl, J.J., Schmitt, L.M., Villano, M., Crowell, C.R.: The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 6(1), 249–262 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.006. ISSN 1750-9467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shibata, T., Wada, K.: Robot therapy: a new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly–a mini-review. Gerontology 57(4), 378–386 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubowsky, S., Genot, F., Godding, S., Kozono, H., Skwersky, A., Yu, H., Shen Yu, L.: PAMM - a robotic aid to the elderly for mobility assistance and monitoring: a “helping-hand” for the elderly. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1, pp. 570–576 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2000.844114

  11. Lacey, G., Dawson-Howe, K.M.: The application of robotics to a mobility aid for the elderly blind. Robot. Auton. Syst. 23, 245–252 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mori, H., Kotani, S.: A robotic travel aid for the blind – attention and custom for safe behavior. In: International Symposium on Robotics Research, pp. 237–245. Springer, London (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Schraft, R.D., Schaeffer, C., May, T.: Care-O-bot(tm): the concept of a system for assisting elderly or disabled persons in home environments. In: IECON: Proceedings of the IEEE 24th Annual Conference, vol. 4, pp. 2476–2481 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson, H., Macdonald, B., Broadbent, E.: The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 575–591 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0242-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shibata, T., et al.: Human interactive robot for psychological enrichment and therapy. In: Proceedings of AISB, vol. 5 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sabelli, A.M., Kanda, T., Hagita, N.: A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In: 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Broekens, J., Heerink, M., Rosendal, H.: Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8(2), 94–103 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harmo, P., et al.: Needs and solutions-home automation and service robots for the elderly and disabled. In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005). IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flandorfer, P.: Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int. J. Popul. Res. 2012, 13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Okamura, A.M., Mataric, M.J., Christensen, H.I.: Medical and health-care robotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 17(3), 26–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Broekens, J., Heerink, M., Rosendal, H.: Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8, 94–103 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Breemen, A., Yan, X., Meerbeek, B.: iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality, 143–144 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1082473.1082823

  23. Mcglynn, S., Snook, B., Kemple, S., Mitzner, T., Rogers, W.: Therapeutic robots for older adults: investigating the potential of Paro. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 246–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559846

  24. Šabanović, S., Bennett, C.C., Chang, W., Huber, L.: PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Seattle, WA, pp. 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/icorr.2013.6650427

  25. Riek, L.D.: Healthcare robotics. Commun. ACM 60(11), 68–78 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pollack, M.E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Engberg, S., Matthews, J., Dunbar-Jacob, J., Mccarthy, C.E., Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., Roy, N.: Pearl: a mobile robotic assistant for the elderly (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Balasubramanian, S., Klein, J., Burdet, E.: Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 23(6), 661–670 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lluch, M.: Healthcare professionals’ organisational barriers to health information technologies—a literature review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(12), 849–862 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gonzales, M.J., Cheung, V.C., Riek, L.D.: Designing collaborative healthcare technology for the acute care workflow. In: 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Pervasive Health) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Riek, L.D.: The social co-robotics problem space: six key challenges. In: Robotics Challenges and Vision (RCV 2013) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hartzog, W.: Unfair and deceptive robots. Md. L. Rev. 74, 785 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thill, S., et al.: Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: challenges and outlook. Paladyn 3(4), 209–217 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ricks, D.J., Colton, M.B.: Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Friedmann, E., et al.: Animal companions and one-year survival of patients after discharge from a coronary care unit. Public Health Rep. 95(4), 307 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stiehl, W.D., et al.: The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Emerging Technologies. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kriglstein, S., Wallner, G.: HOMIE: an artificial companion for elderly people. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2094–2098 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057106

  37. Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., Mataric, M.J.: Robots for use in autism research. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 275–294 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marescaux, J., et al.: Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854), 379 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chinzei, K., et al.: Surgical assist robot for the active navigation in the intraoperative MRI: Hardware design issues. In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000), vol. 1. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hawks, J.A., et al.: Towards an in vivo wireless mobile robot for surgical assistance. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 132, 153–158 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Park, B.J., Flores, R.M., Rusch, V.W.: Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 131(1), 54–59 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Devito, D.P., et al.: Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine 35(24), 2109–2115 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rentschler, M.E., et al.: Natural orifice surgery with an endoluminal mobile robot. Surg. Endosc. 21(7), 1212–1215 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bouazzaouri, S., Witherow, M.A., Castelle, K.M.: Ethics and robotics. In: Proceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management. American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Quinlan, M.J., Chalup, S.K., Middleton, R.H.: Techniques for improving vision and locomotion on the sony AIBO robot (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tamura, T., Yonemitsu, S., Itoh, A., Oikawa, D., Kawakami, A., Higashi, Y., Fujimooto, T., Nakajima, K.: Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? J. Gerontol. Ser. A 59(1), M83–M85 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.1.M83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hockstein, N.G., et al.: A history of robots: from science fiction to surgical robotics. J. Robot. Surg. 1(2), 113–118 (2007). PMC. Web: 1 October 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Capek, K.: R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots). Penguin Group, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Arshia Khan or Yumna Anwar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khan, A., Anwar, Y. (2020). Robots in Healthcare: A Survey. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S. (eds) Advances in Computer Vision. CVC 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 944. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17798-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics