Skip to main content

Preliminary Development of an Integrated Mobility, Lethality, and Survivability Soldier Performance Testing Platform

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 959))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There is a desire for an integrated tool to measure the impact of military clothing and equipment on mobility, lethality and survivability. This study was a first step to develop such a test platform. Twenty Soldiers executed the test in three levels of encumbrance. Mobility was measured via obstacle completion timing. Lethality tasks included static and dynamic shooting engagements, with traditional marksmanship measures and cognitive decision-making. Quantification of body exposure and exposure to threat time comprised survivability measures. Preliminary results indicated that as encumbrance increased, mobility, lethality and survivability were altered. Obstacle completion times increased, marksmanship precision and vertical stability during the static elements improved, and shooting efficiency and threat elimination during the dynamic elements decreased. By expanding on this methodology, we create additional capabilities for the US Army and our international partners. Lessons learned from this study will allow for improvements to the test platform as it is developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Department of the US Army. https://admin.govexec.com/media/untitled.pdf

  2. Brainerd, S.T., Bruno, R.S.: Human factors evaluation of a prototype load-carrying system (Tech. Memo 15-85). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. LaFiandra, M., Lynch, S., Frykman, P., Harman, E., Ramos, H., Mello, R.: A comparison of two commercial off the shelf backpacks to the Modular Lightweight Load Carrying Equipment (MOLLE) in biomechanics, metabolic cost and performance (Tech. Rep. T03-15). U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brewster, F.W.: Technical memorandum: observation report for the load effects assessment program – army (LEAP-A) pilot evaluation, 1–12 December 2014. Maneuver Battle Lab, Fort Benning, GA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tack, D., Kelly, A., Richter, M., Bray-Miner, J.: Preliminary Results of MC-LEAP Testing of U.S. Marine Combat Load Order Configurations. U.S Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, VA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bray-Miners, J., Kelly, A.: CAN-LEAP summary of results—Fall 2012 experimentation series (Tech Memo). Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, CA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dutton, B., Stryker, T.: Soldier load benchmark evaluation. Battle Lab Project Number 0338. Fort Benning, GA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Batty, J.M., Coyne, M.E., DeSimone, L.L., Mitchell, K.B., Bensel, C.K.: Evaluation of weight effects on a soldier physical readiness test course. In: Proceedings of the 2016 American Biomechanics Society. Raleigh, NC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell, K.B., Batty, J.M., Coyne, M.E., DeSimone, L.L., Choi, H.J., Gregorczyk, K.N., Bensel, C.K.: Impact of weight on military mission oriented obstacle course performance. Poster presentation at the 7th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Orlando, FL (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bensel, C.K.: Soldier performance and functionality: Impact of chemical protective clothing. Mil. Psychol. 9(4), 287–302 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carbone, P.D., Carlton, S.D., Stierli, M., Orr, R.M.: The impact of load carriage on the marksmanship of the tactical police officer: a pilot study. J. Aust. Strength Cond. 22(2), 50–57 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson, R.F., Kobrick, J.L.: Effects of wearing chemical protective clothing on rifle marksmanship and on sensory and psychomotor tasks. Mil. Psychol. 9(4), 301–314 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, R.F., McMenemy, D.J., Dauphinee, D.T.: Rifle marksmanship with three types of combat clothing. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, pp. 1529–1532 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown, S.A.T, McNamara, J.A., Choi, H.J., Mitchell, K.B.: Assessment of a marksmanship simulator as a tool for clothing and individual equipment evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 60th Annual Meeting, pp. 1424–1428 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Crowley, J.C., Hallmark, B.W., Shanley, M.G., Sollinger, J.M.: Changing the Army’s Weapon Training Strategies to Meet Operational Requirements More Efficiently and Effectively. Rand Arroyo Center, Santa Monica (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hagman, J.D., Smith, M.D.: Weapon zeroing with the laser marksmanship training system (LMTS). Research report no. 1744. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schendel, J.D., Heller, F.H., Finley, D.L., Hawley, J.K.: Use of weaponeer marksmanship trainer in predicting M16A1 rifle qualification performance. Hum. Factors 27(3), 313–325 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Torre, J.P., Maxey, J.L., Piper, S.: Live fire and simulator marksmanship performance with the M16A1 rifle. Study 1. A validation of the artificial intelligence direct fire weapons research test bed, vol. 1. Main Report. Advanced Technology Inc, Orlando, FL (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. McNamara, J., Choi, H.J., Brown, S.A.T., Mitchell, K.: Evaluating the effects of clothing and individual equipment on marksmanship performance using a novel five target methodology. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 60th Annual Meeting, pp. 2043–2047 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi, H.J., Mitchell, K.B., Garlie, T., McNamara, J., Hennessy, E., Carson, J.: Effects of body armor fit on marksmanship performance. In: Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors, pp. 341–354 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, S.A.T, McNamara, J., Mitchell, K.B.: Dynamic marksmanship: a novel methodology to evaluate the effects of clothing and individual equipment on mission performance. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 61th Annual Meeting, pp. 2020–2024 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasselquist, L., Eddy, M.D., Mitchell, K.B., Brown, S.A., McNamara, J., Hancock, C.L., Caruso, C.: Assessing the impact of clothing and individual equipment (CIE) on soldier physical, biomechanical, and cognitive performance part 1: test methodology (No. NATICK/TR-18/004). Army Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brown, S.T., McNamara, J.A., Mitchell, K.B., Eddy, M.D.: Development of a building clearing methodology for the assessment of soldier. J. Sci. Med. Sport 20, S67 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell, K.B., Choi, H.J., Garlie, T.N.: Anthropometry and range of motion of the encumbered soldier (No. NATICK/TR-17/010). Army Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stanislaw, H., Todorov, N.: Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behav. Res. Methods, instrum. Comput. 31(1), 137–149 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Taverniers, J., De Boeck, P.: Force-on-Force handgun practice: an intra-individual exploration of stress effects, biomarker regulation, and behavioral changes. Hum. Factors 56(2), 403–413 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center (CCDC Soldier Center) research program 16-159 and Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier Project Director Soldier System Integration (PD SS&I). The authors would like to acknowledge the data collection and support team that assisted in the execution of this study from Aberdeen Test Center and CCDC Soldier Center’s Biomechanics and Human Factors Teams. Most importantly, the authors would like to acknowledge the Soldiers who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie A. T. Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brown, S.A.T., Mitchell, K.B. (2020). Preliminary Development of an Integrated Mobility, Lethality, and Survivability Soldier Performance Testing Platform. In: Nunes, I. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 959. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20040-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20040-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20039-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20040-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics