Skip to main content

The Modality Effect of Cognitive Load Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (AHFE 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 963))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The modality effect, which has been investigated by cognitive load theory, predicts that learning from visualizations supplemented with written text should be less effective than learning from the same visualizations supplemented with comparable spoken text. An explanation of the effect assumes a degree of separation between the processing of visuospatial and auditory information. Due to this separability, learning only from visuospatial information (visualizations and visual text) is more likely to overload visuospatial processing, as compared to learning from visuospatial and auditory information (visualizations and auditory text), in which both the visuospatial and the auditory processors share the load of the learning material. The aims of this review chapter are to: (a) describe the modality effect, (b) provide supporting evidence using computer multimedia about STEM topics, and (c) describe studies indicating the separability of visuospatial and auditory processing. We finish by suggesting future directions for research on the modality effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., Kalyuga, S.: Cognitive Load Theory. Springer, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayer, R.E. (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mousavi, S.Y., Low, R., Sweller, J.: Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. J. Educ. Psychol. 87(2), 319–334 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Low, R., Sweller, J.: The modality principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn., pp. 227–246. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baddeley, A.: Working memory. Science 255(5044), 556–559 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, J., Paivio, A.: Dual coding theory and education. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 3(3), 149–210 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., Sweller, J.: The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29(2), 393–405 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginns, P.: Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learn. Instr. 15(4), 313–331 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., Glowalla, U.: A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learn. Instr. 20(2), 100–110 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 13(4), 351–371 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. J. Educ. Psychol. 91(2), 358–368 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Edelmann, J.: The influence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(1), 29–35 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seufert, T., Schütze, M., Brünken, R.: Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: an aptitude-treatment-interaction study. Learn. Instr. 19(1), 28–42 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Koning, B.B., van Hooijdonk, C.M.J., Lagerwerf, L.: Verbal redundancy in a procedural animation: on-screen labels improve retention but not behavioral performance. Comput. Educ. 107, 45–53 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Penney, C.G.: Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Mem. Cogn. 17(4), 398–422 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroll, N.E.A., Parks, T., Parkinson, S.R., Bieber, S.L., Johnson, A.L.: Short-term memory while shadowing: recall of visually and of aurally presented letters. J. Exp. Psychol. 85(2), 220–224 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brünken, R., Steinbacher, S., Plass, J.L., Leutner, D.: Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology. Exp. Psychol. 49(2), 109–119 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruyer, R., Scailquin, J.-C.: The visuospatial sketchpad for mental images: testing the multicomponent model of working memory. Acta Psychol. 98(1), 17–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson, D.H., Katayama, A.D., Fan, A.-C.: Evidence for conjoint retention of information encoded from spatial adjunct displays. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 21(3), 221–239 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson, D.H., Robinson, S.L., Katayama, A.D.: When words are represented in memory like pictures: evidence for spatial encoding of study materials. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 24(1), 38–54 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murdock Jr., B.B.: Four-channel effects in short-term memory. Psychon. Sci. 24(4), 197–198 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kirsner, K., Smith, M.C.: Modality effects in word identification. Mem. Cogn. 2(4), 637–640 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Penney, C.G.: Order of report in bisensory verbal short-term memory. Can. J. Psychol. 34(2), 190–195 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Castro-Alonso, J.C., Ayres, P., Wong, M., Paas, F.: Learning symbols from permanent and transient visual presentations: don’t overplay the hand. Comput. Educ. 116, 1–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayer, R.E., DaPra, C.S.: An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 18(3), 239–252 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J.C., Paas, F., Sweller, J.: Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: evidence from the spacing effect. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 30(2), 483–501 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalyuga, S., Sweller, J.: The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn., pp. 247–262. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: The expertise reversal effect. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 23–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ayres, P., Paas, F.: Making instructional animations more effective: a cognitive load approach. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21(6), 695–700 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van Gog, T.: The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn., pp. 263–278. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Leahy, W., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 25(6), 943–951 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Castro-Alonso, J.C., Wong, M., Adesope, O.O., Ayres, P., Paas, F.: Gender imbalance in instructional dynamic versus static visualizations: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. (2019). Advance Online Publication

    Google Scholar 

  34. Castro-Alonso, J.C., Uttal, D.H.: Spatial ability for university biology education. In: Nazir, S., Teperi, A.-M., Polak-Sopińska, A. (eds.) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences, pp. 283–291. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support from PIA–CONICYT Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence Project FB0003, and CONICYT Fondecyt 11180255, is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Ignacio Jarabran for helping with the illustrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan C. Castro-Alonso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Castro-Alonso, J.C., Sweller, J. (2020). The Modality Effect of Cognitive Load Theory. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T., Nazir, S. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 963. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20135-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20135-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20135-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics