Abstract
The transition from ambiguous and unclear areas of academic enquiry towards well-defined knowledge boundaries confronts design for social change. Research relevant to the epistemological dimensions of the related academic discipline is limited. Identification of Threshold Concepts (TCs) unique to this academic area can help define appropriate knowledge boundaries. TCs are essential knowledge portals that, once mastered, can result in a transformed way of developing knowledge. Transformation may be emergent or protracted. This paper identifies a number of TCs and elaborates on their significance. Data were collected through a questionnaire with participants from academic and social design practice. This paper argues that it is of educational value to consider that some TCs in the related Higher Education (HE) curricula have to do with ways of thinking and practice, rather than the mastering of discrete conceptual ideas. This has implications for curriculum development in the area of design for social change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Friedman, K.: Models of design: envisioning a future design education. Vis. Lang. 46(1), 132–153 (2012)
Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R.: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising. Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses. Occasional Report (2003)
Alden-Rivers, B.: Social innovation education: designing learning for an uncertain world innovation and entrepreneurship in education, pp. 75–90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-229520160000002004
Souleles, N., Savva, S., Ferreira, A.M.: The challenge of embedding design for social change and innovation in Higher Education curricula and the role of DISCERN. In: 9th International Conference Senses and Sensibility. Universidade da Madeira, Funchal, Madeira (2017)
Armstrong, L., Bailey, J., Julier, G., Kimbell, L.: Social Design Futures: HEI Research and the AHRC. Arts and Humanities Research Council, Swindon (2014)
Lasky, J.: Design and Social Impact, a white paper based on the Social Impact Design Summit, a convening by the Smithsonian’s Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the Lemelson Foundation at The Rockefeller Foundation, New York (2013)
Rocha, H., Ferreira, A.M., Azevedo, J.: Paradigm shift in design education to boost strategic innovations. In: DDC 4th Conference on Sustainable Solutions and Social Change, Design Doctoral Conference 2017. IADE, Universidade Europeia, EDIÇÕES IADE (2017)
Chick, A.: Design for social innovation: emerging principles and approaches. Iridescent 2(1), 78–90 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/19235003.2012.11428505
Souleles, N.: Design for social change and design education: social challenges versus teacher-centred pedagogies. Des. J. 20, S927–S936 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353037
Rodrigio, R.: Design as interpretation: exploring threshold concepts in first year design education. In: Connected 2010 – 2nd International Conference on Design Education. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (2010)
Manzini, E.: Designing in a changing, connected world. Strateg. Des. Res. J. 7(2), 95–99 (2014)
Thorpe, A., Gamman, L.: Design with society: why socially responsive design is good enough. CoDesign 7(3–4), 217–230 (2011)
Smith, I.H., Woodworth, W.P.: Developing social entrepreneurs and social innovators: a social identity and self-efficacy approach. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 11, 390–407 (2012)
Buchanan, R.: Design research and the new learning. Des. Issues 17(4), 3–23 (2001)
Jones, P.H.: Systemic design principles for complex social systems. In: Social Systems and Design, pp. 91–128, Springer, Japan (2014)
Vande Zande, R.S.: Teaching design education for cultural, pedagogical, and economic aims. Stud. Art Educ. 51(3), 248–261 (2010)
Fierst, K., Diefenthaler, A., Diefenthaler, G.: Design Thinking for Educators. Riverdale, CA, IDEO (2011)
Westley, F., Goebey, S., Robinson, K.: Change Lab/Design Lab for Social Innovation. Waterloo Institute of Social Innovation and Resilience, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (2012)
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M.: Design in principle and practice: a reconsideration of the terms of design engagement. Des. J. 14(1), 45–63 (2011)
Dykes, T., Rodgers, P., Smyth, M.: Towards a new disciplinary framework for contemporary creative design practice. CoDesign 5(2), 99–116 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880902910417
Thomson, M., Koskinen, T.: Design for growth & prosperity. Report and Recommendations of the European Design Leadership Board. DG Enterprise and Industry of the European Commission (2012)
Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2), 5–21 (1992)
Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R.: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. High. Educ. 49, 373–388 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
Gray, M., Siegel, M.A.: Sketching design thinking: representations of design in education and practice. In: DRS//CUMULUS 2013, 2nd International Conference for Design Education Researchers. HiOA, Oslo, Norway (2013)
Papanek, V.: Design for the Real World, 1st edn. Knopf Doubleday, New York (1971)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Souleles, N., Ferreira, A.M., Savva, S. (2020). Threshold Concepts and Design for Social Change. In: Goossens, R., Murata, A. (eds) Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 970. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20144-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20145-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)