Skip to main content

Field Performance of Portland Limestone Cement Concretes Exposed to Cold-Temperature Sulphate Solutions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
External Sulphate Attack – Field Aspects and Lab Tests

Part of the book series: RILEM Bookseries ((RILEM,volume 21))

  • 428 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents data from a field test program to evaluate the sulphate resistance of concrete produced with varying limestone contents (0–15%) and supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) contents in order to evaluate the risk of thaumasite formation, which is expedited at cold temperatures (0–10 ℃). Concrete specimens were placed in one of three sulphate solutions (Na2SO4, MgSO4, CaSO4), which were buried approximately 2 m below ground (temperature varying from 4 to 13 ℃). Specimens were retrieved annually to measure expansion, resonant frequency, mass loss and to conduct visual rating. Following six years of exposure, concrete with higher w/cm exhibited an increased level of expansion; however, minimal differences were found between varying limestone contents. The addition of fly ash or silica fume to Portland limestone cement produced concretes with better sulphate resistance than Type MS (moderate sulphate) cement concretes and mirrored the performance of ordinary Portland cement with fly ash and silica fume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on the results of compressive strength testing and external sulphate exposure we are of the opinion that the 9% limestone cement might not have been optimized properly during grinding.

References

  1. Hooton RD, Nokken M, Thomas MDA (2007) Portland-limestone cement: state-of-the-art report and gap analysis for CSA A3000 SN3053. Cement Association of Canada, Skokie, Illinois, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hartshorn SA, Sharp JH, Swamy RN (1999) Thaumasite formation in Portland-limestone cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 29:1331–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Irassar EF (2009) Sulfate attack on cementitious materials containing limestone filler. A review. Cem Concr Res 39(3):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker A, Hobbs D (1999) Performance of Portland limestone cements in mortar prisms immersed in sulfate solutions at 5 ℃. Cem Concr Compos 21:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crammond NJ, Collett G, Longworth T (2003) Thaumasite field trial at Shipston on Stour: Three-year preliminary assessment of buried concretes. Cement Concr Compos 25(8):1035–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Association Européenne du Ciment The European Cement Association (2001) CEMBUREAU Annual Report 2001, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramezanianpour AM, Hooton D (2017) A study on hydration, compressive strength, and porosity of Portland-limestone cement mixes containing SCMs. Cem Concr Compos 51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee ST, Hooton D (2016) Influence of limestone addition on the performance of cement mortars and pastes exposed to a cold sodium sulfate solution. J Test Eval

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramezanianpour AM, Hooton D (2013) Sulfate resistance of Portland-limestone cements in combination with supplementary cementitious materials. Mater Struct 46(7):1061–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramezanianpour AM, Hooton D (2013) Thaumasite sulfate attack in Portland and Portland-limestone cement mortars exposed to sulfate solution. Constr Build Mater 40:162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hooton RD, Ramezanianpour A, Schutz U (2010) Decreasing the clinker component in cementing materials: performance of Portland-limestone cements in concrete in combination with supplementary cementing materials. In: Concrete sustainability conference

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hooton RD, Ramezanianpour AM, Schutz U (2010) Decreasing the clinker component in cementing materials: performance of Portland-limestone cements in concrete in combination with supplementary cementing materials. In: e- Proceedings, NRMCA 2010 concrete sustainability conference April 13–15, Tempe, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hooton RD, Ahani RM, Fung R (2014) Durable & sustainable concretes with Portland-limestone cements and supplementary cementing materials. In: International conference sustainability conference, pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hooton RD, Thomas MDA (2012) The use of limestone in Portland cements: effect on thaumasite form of sulfate attack. Portland Cement Association. PCA R&D Serial No. 2658

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hossack .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 RILEM

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hossack, A., Thomas, M.D.A., Moffatt, E. (2020). Field Performance of Portland Limestone Cement Concretes Exposed to Cold-Temperature Sulphate Solutions. In: Menéndez, E., Baroghel-Bouny, V. (eds) External Sulphate Attack – Field Aspects and Lab Tests. RILEM Bookseries, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20331-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20331-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20330-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20331-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics