Abstract
For many decades, we recognized four human factors: physical, cognitive, social, and cultural. Approximately at the turn of the millennium, we increasingly began to recognize, based on a variety of evidence from psychology, physiology, neurophilosophy, and other fields, that affect should be added as a new category. To understand the human, the argument went, we were missing an important component if we left out emotion. That perspective has been sufficiently well accepted that the dedicated society and conference for the topic, Design and Emotion, was able to declare success, and held its last event in Amsterdam, then closed its doors in 2016.
In this paper, we argue that we should recognize that another aspect of being human is the environment itself. As ecological psychologist Gibson famously said, “Do not ask what is in your head. Ask instead what your head is in” [1]. In order to more completely understand the human factors that are relevant to a particular design, we should be systematically studying the surrounds. These will include everything from the many microscopic symbiotes that make up the human system, to the infrastructure designed and developed by people, to the natural support provided by the planet. Although not typically recognized as part of being human, it is unreasonable to think of people as somehow being apart from the environment that they inhabit. The tendency to separate the two into distinct categories has arguably resulted in some of the worst effects of human activity, as has become increasingly recognized by the people interested in post-human design (e.g. [2,3,4,5]).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston (1979)
Forlano, L.: Decentering the human in the design of collaborative cities. Des. Issues 32(3), 42–54 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00398
Stengers, I.: Including nonhumans in political theory: opening Pandora’s box? In: Braun, B., Whatmore, S.J. (Eds.) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, pp. 3–34 (2010)
Tironi, M., Hermansen, P., Neira, J.: The prototype as a cosmopolitical place: ethnographic design practice and research at the National Zoo in Santiago, Chile. In: Proceedings of DRS 2016, Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference, 27–30 June 2016, Brighton, UK (2016)
Nippert-Eng, C., Dominski, J., Grier, F., Hornor, J., Limb, E., Limb, S., Martinez, M.: Gorillas Up Close. Henry Holt and Company, New York (2016)
Ruecker, S., Radzikowska, M., Sinclair, S.: Visual Interface Design for Digital Cultural Heritage: A Guide to Rich-Prospect Browsing. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ruecker, S. et al. (2020). Should the Environment Be a Human Factor?. In: Shin, C. (eds) Advances in Interdisciplinary Practice in Industrial Design. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 968. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20470-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20470-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20469-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20470-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)