Skip to main content

A Cross-Sectional Study Using Wireless Electrocardiogram to Investigate Physical Workload of Wheelchair Control in Real World Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

The wheelchair is a key invention that provides individuals with limitations in mobility increased independence and participation in society. However, wheelchair control is a complicated motor task that increases physical and mental workload. New wheelchair interfaces, including power-assisted devices can further enable users by reducing the required effort especially in more demanding environments. The protocol engaged novice wheelchair users to push a wheelchair with and without power assist in a simple and complex environment using wireless Electrocardiogram (ECG) to approximate heart rate (HR). Results indicated that HR determined from ECG data, decreased with use of the power-assist. The use of power-assist however did reduce behavioral performance, particularly within obstacles that required more control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McClure, L.A., Boninger, M.L., Oyster, M.L., Williams, S., Houlihan, B., Lieberman, J.A., Cooper, R.A.: Wheelchair repairs, breakdown, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 90, 2034–2038 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, C., McCreadie, M., Unsworth, J., Wickings, H.I., Harrison, A.: Patient satisfaction: an indicator of quality in disablement services centres. Qual. Health Care 44, 31–3631 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalyan, M., Cardenas, D.D., Gerard, B.: Upper extremity pain after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 37, 191–195 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fullerton, H.D., Borckardt, J.J., Alfano, A.P.: Shoulder pain: a comparison of wheelchair athletes and nonathletic wheelchair users. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 35, 1958–1961 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holloway, C.S., Symonds, A., Suzuki, T., Gall, A., Smitham, P., Taylor, S.: Linking wheelchair kinetics to glenohumeral joint demand during everyday accessibility activities. In: 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 2478–2481 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asheghan, M., Hollisaz, M.T., Taheri, T., Kazemi, H., Aghda, A.K.: The prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome among long-term manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. J. Spinal Cord Med. 39, 265–271 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tawashy, A.E., Eng, J.J., Krassioukov, A.V., Miller, W.C., Sproule, S.: Aerobic exercise during early rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injury. Phys. Ther. 90, 427–437 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Den Berg-Emons, R.J., Bussmann, J.B., Haisma, J.A., Sluis, T.A., Van Der Woude, L.H.V., Bergen, M.P., Stam, H.J.: Prospective study on physical activity levels after spinal cord injury during inpatient rehabilitation and the year after discharge. Assistive Technol. Res. Ser. 26, 134–136 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gauthier, C., Arel, J., Brosseau, R., Hicks, A.L., Gagnon, D.H.: Reliability and minimal detectable change of a new treadmill-based progressive workload incremental test to measure cardiorespiratory fitness in manual wheelchair users. J. Spinal Cord Med. 40, 759–767 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Der Scheer, J.W., De Groot, S., Tepper, M., Gobets, D., Veeger, D.J.H.E.J., Van Der Woude, L.H.V., Woldring, F., Valent, L., Slootman, H., Faber, W.: Wheelchair-specific fitness of inactive people with long-term spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 47, 330–337 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holloway, C., Tyler, N.: A micro-level approach to measuring the accessibility of footways for wheelchair users using the Capability Model. Transp. Planning Technol. 36, 636–649 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holloway, C.S.: The Effect of Footway Crossfall Gradient on Wheelchair Accessibility. Department of Civil, Environmental, & Geomatic Engineering. University College London, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kloosterman, M.G.M., Snoek, G.J., Van Der Woude, L.H.V., Buurke, J.H., Rietman, J.S.: A systematic review on the pros and cons of using a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair. Clin. Rehabil. 27, 299–313 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper, R.A., Boninger, M.L., Spaeth, D.M., Ding, D., Guo, S., Koontz, A.M., Fitzgerald, S.G., Cooper, R., Kelleher, A., Collins, D.M.: Engineering better wheelchairs to enhance community participation. In: IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 14, pp. 438–455 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Woude, L.H.V., de Groot, S., Janssen, T.W.J.: Manual wheelchairs: research and innovation in rehabilitation, sports, daily life, and health. Med. Eng. Phys. 28, 905–915 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine: Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: what you should know (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morgado Ramirez, D.Z., Holloway, C.: “But, i don’t want/need a power wheelchair”: toward accessible power assistance for manual wheelchairs. In: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 120–129 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao, Y., Tang, J., Cao, Y., Jiao, X., Xu, M., Zhou, P., Ming, D., Qi, H.: Effects of distracting task with different mental workload on steady-state visual evoked potential based brain computer interfaces - an offline study. Front. Neurosci. 12, 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 2, 140–160 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hancock, P.A., Parasuraman, R.: Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems. J. Saf. Res. 23, 181–198 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oyster, M.L., Smith, I.J., Kirby, R.L., Cooper, T.A., Groah, S.L., Pedersen, J.P., Boninger, M.L.: Wheelchair skill performance of manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 18, 138–139 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Causse, M., Chua, Z., Peysakhovich, V., Del Campo, N., Matton, N.: Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–15 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Curtin, A., Ayaz, H.: The age of neuroergonomics: towards ubiquitous and continuous measurement of brain function with fNIRS. Jap. Psychol. Res. 60, 374–386 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ayaz, H., Dehais, F.: Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work and in Everyday Life. Elsevier, Academic Press, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clark, V.P., Parasuraman, R.: Neuroenhancement: enhancing brain and mind in health and in disease. NeuroImage 85, 889–894 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gramann, K., Fairclough, S.H., Zander, T.O., Ayaz, H.: Editorial: trends in neuroergonomics. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 11–14 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karwowski, W., Siemionow, W., Gielo-Perczak, K.: Physical neuroergonomics: the human brain in control of physical work activities. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 4, 175–199 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehta, R.K., Parasuraman, R.: Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 1–10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Parasuraman, R.: Neuroergonomics: research and practice. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 4, 5–20 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Parasuraman, R.: Neuroergonomics: brain, cognition, and performance at work. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 181–186 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Parasuraman, R., Christensen, J., Grafton, S.: Neuroergonomics: the brain in action and at work. NeuroImage 59, 1–3 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M.: Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work. Oxford Univesity Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fallahi, M., Motamedzade, M., Heidarimoghadam, R., Soltanian, A.R., Miyake, S.: Assessment of operators’ mental workload using physiological and subjective measures in cement, city traffic and power plant controlcenters. Health Promo. Perspect. 6, 96–103 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sauer, J., Nickel, P., Wastell, D.: Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress. Appl. Ergon. 44, 119–127 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen, W.Y., Jang, Y., Wang, J.D., Huang, W.N., Chang, C.C., Mao, H.F., Wang, Y.H.: Wheelchair-related accidents: relationship with wheelchair-using behavior in active community wheelchair users. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 92, 892–898 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Roscoe, A.H.: Assessing pilot workload. Why measure heart rate, HRV and respiration? Biol. Psychol. 34, 259–287 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Title II 279–279 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas, S., Reading, J., Shephard, R.J.: Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can. J. Sport Sci. = J. Can. des sciences du sport 17, 338–345 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  39. https://www.slideshare.net/chessarose/wheelchair-accessible-obstacle-course

  40. Meyers, A.R., Anderson, J.J., Miller, D.R., Shipp, K., Hoenig, H.: Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Soc. Sci. Med. 55, 1435–1446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rimmer, J.H., Riley, B., Wang, E., Rauworth, A., Jurkowski, J.: Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. Am. J. Prev. Med. 26, 419–425 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Light, K.C., Obrist, P.A.: Task difficulty, heart rate reactivity, and cardiovascular responses to an appetitive reaction time task. Psychophysiology 20, 301–312 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Faure, V., Lobjois, R., Benguigui, N.: The effects of driving environment complexity and dual tasking on drivers’ mental workload and eye blink behavior. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 40, 78–90 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lyu, N., Xie, L., Wu, C., Fu, Q., Deng, C.: Driver’s cognitive workload and driving performance under traffic sign information exposure in complex environments: a case study of the highways in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 1–25 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stikic, M., Berka, C., Levendowski, D.J., Rubio, R., Tan, V., Korszen, S., Barba, D., Wurzel, D.: Modeling temporal sequences of cognitive state changes based on a combination of EEG-engagement, EEG-workload, and heart rate metrics. Front. Neurosci. 8, 1–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hilbers, P.A., White, T.P.: Effects of wheelchair design on metabolic and heart rate responses during propulsion by persons with paraplegia. Phys. Ther. 67, 1355–1358 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Champagne, A., Gagnon, D.H., Vincent, C.: Comparison of cardiorespiratory demand and rate of perceived exertion during propulsion in a natural environment with and without the use of a mobility assistance dog in manual wheelchair users, vol. 95, p. 685. Published for the AAP by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li, W.-C., Chiu, F.-C., Kuo, Y.-s., Wu, K.-J.: The investigation of visual attention and workload by experts and novices in the cockpit BT - engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics. In: Applications and Services, pp. 167–176. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jamie Whitty and Joel Chappell of the School of Architecture from Oxford Brookes University, for constructing our ramps, Ian Allen, the Oxford Brookes sports booking coordinator, for helping us with numerous appointments, and our research assistants Cyrus Goodger, Jessica Andrich, and JoJo Dawes. This research was funded through the Adaptive Assistive Rehabilitative Technologies – Beyond the Clinic grant by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M025543/1). SJ is additionally supported by the Fulbright US-UK Commission. HD is supported by the Elizabeth Casson Trust and received support from the NIHR Oxford health Biomedical Research Centre. Additional support provided by CONACYT (National Council of Science and Technology in Mexico).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn Joshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Joshi, S. et al. (2020). A Cross-Sectional Study Using Wireless Electrocardiogram to Investigate Physical Workload of Wheelchair Control in Real World Environments. In: Ayaz, H. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 953. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20473-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics