Skip to main content

Cognitive and Organizational Criteria for Workstation Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control (AHFE 2019)

Abstract

The workstation becomes comfortable environment when adopting appropriate criteria for its design and adjustment in the accomplishment of the routine tasks. Organizational and cognitive design deserves attention of entrepreneurs to avoid human error and failure. This design is based on discussions about cognitive processing, standards with risk analysis and guidelines for good practice. The writing and the execution of the procedures demand revisions to the control of the tasks and their conformity in the multidisciplinary aspects. The failed on the task analysis due to human and organizational factors investigates the chronology, logic and materialization of the failure indicating the need of revision the culture design and the process. This research discusses the workstation to achieve the best performance of the task with criteria that decrease or nullify the human error. This activity results in increased productivity, profit and quality of life in addition to the reduction of human error, fatigue and cost of production reaching industrial sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mrugalska, B.: Health-aware model-predictive control of a cooperative AGV-based production system. Sensors 19(3), 532 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lorenzo, D.K: API 770 – A Manager’s Guide to Reducing Human Errors: Improving Human Performance in the Process Industries. API Publishing Services, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mrugalska, B., Nazir, S., Tytyk, E., Øvergård, K.I.: Human error and response to alarms in process safety. DYNA 83(197), 81–86 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perrow, C.: Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ávila, S.: Failure analysis in complex processes. In: Proceedings of 19th Brazilian Chemical Engineering Congress. COBEQ, Búzios (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kawecka-Endler, A., Mrugalska, B.: Analysis of changes in work processes, In: Vink, P. (ed.) Advances in Social and Organizational Factors, pp. 672–681. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vidal, M.C.: Guide to Ergonomic Work Analysis (AET) in the Company. Virtual Scientific, Rio de Janeiro (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Badiru, A.B, Bommer, S.C.: Work Design: A Systematic Approach. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ávila, F.S., Menezes, M.L.A.: Influence of local archetypes on the operability & usability of instruments in control rooms. In: Proceedings of European Safety and Reliability Conference – ESREL, Zurich (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chavienato, I.: Gestão de Pessoas. Manole, São Paulo (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stenberg Junior, R. Cognitive Psychology. Artmed, Porto Alegre (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swain A.D., Gutmann, H.E.: Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278, SAND800 200, RX, AN) Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27(2/3) (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vidal, M. C., Carvalho, P. V. R. de.: Cognitive Ergonomcs. Virtual Scientific, Rio de Janeiro (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marais, K., Leveson, N.G.: Archetypes for organizational safety. Saf. Sci., August (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ávila, S.: Etiology of operational abnormalities at industry, a model of learning. Doc-torate Thesis at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Chemistry School, Rio de Janeiro (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ávila S.F., Pessoa F.L.P.: Proposition of review in EEMUA 201 & ISO Standard 11064 based on cultural aspects in labor team. Proc. Manuf. 3, 6101–6108 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Embrey, D.: Preventing Human Error: Developing a Consensus Led Safety Culture Based on Best Practice. Human Reliability Associates Ltd., London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boring R, Blackman H. The Origins of SPAR-H Method’s Performance Shaping Factors Multipliers. EUA, Idaho. August (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ávila, S., Cerqueira, I., Drigo, E.: Cognitive, intuitive and educational intervention strategies for behavior change in high-risk activities - SARS. In: Karwowski, W., Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 793, pp. 367–377, Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cerqueira, I.; Drigo, E.; Ávila, S.; Gagliano, M.: C4t: safe behaviour performance tool. In: Karwowski, W., Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B., Di Nicolantonio, M., Rossi, E. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 793, pp. 343–353, Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Drigo, E.S., Ávila Filho, S., Sousa C.A.O. Operator discourse analysis as a tool for risk management. In: Proceedings of European Safety and Reliability Conference – ESREL, Zurich (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Drigo, E.S.; Avila, S.F. Organizational communication: discussion of pyramid model application in shift records. In: 8th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Avila, S.F., Fonseca, M.N.E; Santos, A.L.A.; Santino, C.N.: Analysis of cognitive gaps: training program in the sulfuric acid plant. In: Proceedings of European Safety and Reliability Conference, Glasgow, Scotland (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Salvador Ávila , Beata Mrugalska , Magdalena K. Wyrwicka , Maraisa Souza , Jade Ávila , Érica Cayres or Júlia Ávila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ávila, S. et al. (2020). Cognitive and Organizational Criteria for Workstation Design. In: Karwowski, W., Trzcielinski, S., Mrugalska, B. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing, Production Management and Process Control. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 971. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20494-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20494-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20494-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics