Skip to main content

Simulation Setup

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 799 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 245))

Abstract

The idea of this part is to compare selected and representative methods with the simulation benchmarks. Three areas of the industrial control are covered and reviewed in the chapter: assessment measures and methodology, considered control algorithms and assessed processes and control philosophies. The most representative measures are selected and validated with different SISO and MIMO simulated processes. These experiments address two main control algorithms used in process industry, i.e. PID and Model Predictive Control (MPC).

The enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan.

– Carl von Clausewitz

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adam, E.J., Marchetti, J.L.: Designing and tuning robust feedforward controllers. Comput. Chem. Eng. 28(9), 1899–1911 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T.: New tuning methods for PID controllers. In: Proceedings 3rd European Control Conference, pp. 2456–2462 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Åström, K.J., Hägglund, T.: Benchmark systems for pid control. In: IFAC Digital Control: Past, Present and Future of PlD Control, pp. 165–166 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bequette, B.: Process Control: Modeling, Design, and Simulation, 1st edn. Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Camacho, E.F., Bordons, C.: Model Predictive Control. Springer, London, UK (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, W., Mohtadi, C., Tuffs, P.S.: Generalized predictive control—I. the basic algorithm. Automatica 23(2), 137–148 (1987a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, W., Mohtadi, C., Tuffs, P.S.: Generalized predictive control—II. extensions and interpretations. Automatica 23(2), 149–160 (1987b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cutler, R., Ramaker, B.: Dynamic matrix control—a computer control algorithm. In: Proceedings AIChE National Meeting, Houston, TX, US (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreau, H.J., Almér, S., Peyrl, H., Jerez, J.L., Domahidi, A.: Survey of industrial applications of embedded model predictive control. In: 2016 European Control Conference, pp. 601–601 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forbes, M.G., Patwardhan, R.S., Hamadah, H., Gopaluni, R.B.: Model predictive control in industry: challenges and opportunities. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(8), 531–538, 9th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes ADCHEM 2015 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeng, J.C., Lee, M.W.: Identification and controller tuning of cascade control systems based on closed-loop step responses. IFAC Proc. 45(15), 414–419, 8th IFAC Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalman, R.E.: Contribution to the theory of optimal control. Boletin de la Sociedad Mathematica Mexicana 5, 102–119 (1960)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J.H.: Model predictive control: review of the three decades of development. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 9(3), 415 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maciejowski, J.M.: Predictive Control With Constraints. Prentice Hall, Harlow (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta, U., Majhi, S.: On-line identification of cascade control systems based on half limit cycle data. ISA Trans. 50(3), 473–478 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qin, S.J., Badgwell, T.A.: A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Eng. Pract. 11, 733–764 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Richalet, J., Rault, A., Testud, J.L., Papon, J.: Model algorithmic control of industrial processes. IFAC Proc. 10(16), 103–120, preprints of the 5th IFAC/IFIP International Conference on Digital Computer Applications to Process Control, The Hague, The Netherlands, 14–17 June, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tatjewski, P.: Advanced Control of Industrial Processes, Structures and Algorithms. Springer, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wood, R.K., Berry, M.W.: Terminal composition control of a binary distillation column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 28(9), 1707–1717 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto, S., Hashimoto, I.: Present status and future needs: the view from Japanese industry. In: Proceedings 4th International Conference on Chemical Process Control, pp. 1–28 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paweł D. Domański .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Domański, P.D. (2020). Simulation Setup. In: Control Performance Assessment: Theoretical Analyses and Industrial Practice. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23593-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics