Advertisement

Brief History

  • Raúl Trujillo-CabezasEmail author
  • José Luis Verdegay
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 387)

Abstract

The field of Futures Studies has been sculpted for 2500 years. Heraclitus, Plato, Aristotle, Parmenides, from ancient times, in addition to Jacques Bernoulli, Von Clausewitz and Von Moltke and many other authors have an invaluable intellectual contribution to the development of the field of Future Studies. The developments during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries showed multiples authors with differential theoretical and empirical proposals, but they shared the notion of collective construction of the future and the social action as key issues in the field. However, at the present time the field of Futures Studies must introduce new epistemological and ontological elements to understand the new phenomena that should be studied. Therefore, this chapter hopes to help the reader recognize the conductive threads and milestones that have shaped and will give a new shape to the field of Future Studies.

References

  1. Adegoke, A., & Traoré, M. (2014). System of systems based approaches to global simulation in Africa. In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Simulation Symposium.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. (1928). Essai sur la connaissance approche. Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Bachelard, G. (1934). Le Nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris X, France: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
  4. Bachelard, G. (1936). Dans Inquisitions, du surralisme au Front populaire. Facsimil la revue (1936) augm (s. l. documents indits, Ed.) Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Bachelard, G. (1938). La Formation lesprit scientifique. Paris: Librairie.Google Scholar
  6. Bachelard, G. (1940). La Philosophie du non. Essai dune philosophie du nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris 4, France: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
  7. Bachelard, G. (1949). Le Rationalisme appliqu. Paris 3, france: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
  8. Bañuls, V., Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. (2013). Collaborative scenario modeling in emergency management through cross-impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(9), 1756–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Barré, R., & Keenan, M. (2008). Revisiting foresight rationales: What lessons from the social sciences and humanities? In Future-oriented technology analysis (pp. 41–52). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Bell, D. (1965). The study of the future. The Public Interest, 1(119).Google Scholar
  12. Bell, W., & Olick, J. (1989). An epistemology for the futures field: Problems and possibilities of prediction. Futures, 21(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berry, B. (1994). As 2000 approaches: Millennial conjunctures and apocalyptic prophecy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 47(1), 115–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berry, B. (1996). Technology-driven forecasts, the Phillips curve, and monetary policy-making. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(2), 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berry, B. (1997). Long waves and geography in the 21st century. Futures, 29(4–5), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blondel, M. (1936). L’action.Google Scholar
  17. Blondel, M. (1893). L'action, essai d'une critique de la vie et d'une science de la pratique.Google Scholar
  18. Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (Vol. 18). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J., & Passeron, J. (2010). Le métier de sociologue: Préalables épistémologiques. Contient un entretien avec Pierre Bourdieu recueilli par Beate Krais (Vol. 1). Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brier, D. (2005). Marking the future: A review of time horizons. Futures, 37(8), 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Calderón, P. (2004). Historia de las doctrinas filosóficas. Pearson Educación.Google Scholar
  25. Cazes, B. (1986). Histoire des futurs. Paris: Les figures de l’avenir de saint Augustin au XXIe siècle.Google Scholar
  26. CEPS. (2017). Centre d’Etude et de Prospective Stratégique. Retrieved octubre 2, 2017, from CEPS: http://www.ceps-oing.org/ceps.
  27. Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Comte, A. (1842). Cours de philosophie positive.Google Scholar
  29. Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Darbellay, F. (2015). Rethinking inter-and transdisciplinarity: Undisciplined knowledge and the emergence of a new thought style. Futures, 65, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De Jouvenel, B. (1967). L’arte della congettura. Florencia: Vallecchi Editore.Google Scholar
  33. De Jouvenel, H. (1993). Sur la démarche prospective. Futuribles, 179.Google Scholar
  34. Derbyshire, J. (2016). The implications, challenges and benefits of a complexity-orientated Futures Studies. Futures, 77, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R., Rossignoli, C., & Scarpellini, P. (2016). Measuring the effects of transdisciplinary research: The case of a social farming project. Futures, 75, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dickson, P. (1972). Think tanks. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  38. Duperrin, J., & Godet, M. (1975). SMIC 74—a method for constructing and ranking scenarios. Futures, 7(4), 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Edmonds, B., & Meyer, R. (2015). Simulating social complexity. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Follet, M. (1896). The speaker in the house of representatives. New York: Burt Franklin Reprints.Google Scholar
  42. Follet, M. (1925). Power. In P. Graham (Eds.), Mary Parker Follett-Prophet management: A celebration writings from 1920s. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  43. Follet, M. (1940). Dynamic administration. In H. Metcalf & L. Ulwick (Eds.), Collected papers Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  44. Follett, M. (1918). New state: Group organization solution popular government. New York: Longman Greens and Co.Google Scholar
  45. Follett, M. (1949). Basis authority. In L. Urwick (Ed.), Freedom and co-ordination: Lectures business organization by Mary Parker Follett (pp. 34–46). London: Management Publications Trust Ltd.Google Scholar
  46. Forrest, C. (2009). A system-based, qualitative inference method of heuristics for foresight and futures studies (Doctoral dissertation). Leeds Metropolitan University.Google Scholar
  47. Fowles, J. (1978). Handbook of futures research. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  48. Gantt, H. (1903). A graphical daily balance in manufacture. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, XXIV, 1322–1336.Google Scholar
  49. Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. (2006). Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 761–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gibb, C. (1947). The principles and traits of leadership. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Godet, M. (1976a). Scenarios of air transport development to 1990 by SMIC 74—A new cross-impact method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 9(3), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Godet, M. (1976b). SMIC 74: A reply from the authors. Futures, 8(4), 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Godet, M. (1983). Reducing the blunders in forecasting. Futures, 15(3), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Godet, M. (1985). Prospective et planification stratégique. Paris: Editions CNAM.Google Scholar
  55. Godet, M. (1986). Introduction to la prospective: Seven key ideas and one scenario method. Futures, 18(2), 134–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Godet, M. (1988). La France malade du diplôme. Le Monde de l’Education.Google Scholar
  57. Godet, M. (1990a). From anticipation to action—A handbook of strategic prospective. UNESCO.Google Scholar
  58. Godet, M. (1990b). Integration of scenarios and strategic management: using relevant, consistent and likely scenarios. Futures, 22(7), 730–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Godet, M. (1995a). Estrategia y Gestión Competitiva, De la anticipación de la acción: Manual de Prospectiva y Estrategia. (Alfaomega, Ed.).Google Scholar
  60. Godet, M. (1995b). How to be rigorous with scenario planning. Foresight, 2(1), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Godet, M., & Lesourne, J. (1985). La fin des habitudes. Editions Seghers.Google Scholar
  62. Godet, M., & Roubelat, F. (1996). Creating the future: the use and misuse of scenarios. Long Range Planning, 29(2), 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Godet, M., Monti, R., Meunier, F., & Roubelat, F. (1999). Scenarios and strategies: A toolbox for scenario planning. Paris: Librairie des Arts et Meiters.Google Scholar
  64. Gordon, T. (1969). Cross-impact matrices: An illustration of their use for policy analysis. Futures, 1(6), 527–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Gordon, T., & Greenspan, D. (1994). The management of chaotic systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 47(1), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gordon, T., & Hayward, H. (1968). Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting. Futures, 1(2), 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Goux-Baudiment, F. (1996). Qu’est-ce que la prospective. Paris: Progective.Google Scholar
  68. Goux-Baudiment, F. (1997). Une rebellion constructive. Paris: Progective.Google Scholar
  69. Goux-Baudiment, F. (1998). Prospective de troisième génération: le cas de la prospective territoriale. Paris: Progective.Google Scholar
  70. Groff, L., & Smoker, P. (2003). Introduction to futures studies. Recuperado el 10 de 11 de 2018, de http://www5.csudh.edu/global_options/introfs.html.
  71. Grübler, A., & Nakićenović, N. (1996). Decarbonizing the global energy system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hazlitt, W. (1805). An essay on the principles of human action: Being an argument in favour of the natural disinterestedness of the human mind. J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  73. Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und zeit.Google Scholar
  74. Heiko, A., Vennemann, C., & Darkow, I. (2010). Corporate foresight and innovation management: A portfolio-approach in evaluating organizational development. Futures, 42(4), 380–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Huber, B. (1971). Sociology of the future: Theory, cases and annotated bibliography.Google Scholar
  76. Husserl, E. (1931). Méditations cartésiennes: introduction à la phénoménologie.Google Scholar
  77. Husserl, E. (1936). HuDie Krisis der europ€ aischen Wissenschaften und die tranzendentale Ph€ anomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die ph€ anomenologische Philosophie. W. Biemel (hrsg), 2, 77–176.Google Scholar
  78. Inayatullah, S. (1988). Sarkar’s spiritual dialectics: An unconventional view of the future. Futures, 20(1), 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Inayatullah, S. (1990). Deconstructing and reconstructing the future: Predictive, cultural and critical epistemologies. Futures, 22(2), 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Inayatullah, S. (1993). From ‘who am I?’to ‘when am I?’: Framing the shape and time of the future. Futures, 25(3), 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Inayatullah, S. (1994). Life, the universe and emergence. Futures, 26(6), 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Inayatullah, S. (1995). Futures visions for South-east Asia: Some early warning signals. Futures, 27(6), 681–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Inayatullah, S., Slaughter, R., & Stevenson, T. (1992). The first WFSF Asia–Pacific course: The futures of development. Futures, 24(10), 1064–1066.Google Scholar
  84. Irvine, J., & Martin, B. (1984). Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  85. Jantsch, E. (1968). Technological forecasting in corporate planning. Long Range Planning, 1(1), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Joseph, E. (1974). An introduction to studying the future. World Future Society, 233.Google Scholar
  87. Kahn, H. (1961). On thermonuclear war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Kahn, H. (1964). Thinking about the unthinkable. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  89. Kant, I. (1871). Kritik der reinen Vernunft.Google Scholar
  90. Keenan, M., & Miles, I. (2002). Practical guide to regional foresight in the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  91. Kitzler, A. (2014). Wie lebe ich ein gutes Leben?: Philosophie für Praktiker. Pattloch eBook.Google Scholar
  92. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  93. Koyré, A. (1928). La philosophie de Jacob Boehme. Paris 3.Google Scholar
  94. Koyré, A. (1940). Du Monde Clos à l’Univers Infini. Paris: Études Galiléennes, Hermann.Google Scholar
  95. La Prospective. (2017). Retrieved October 2, 2017, from La prospectiva para pensar diferente: http://www.laprospective.fr.
  96. Lane, D. (1999). Social theory and system dynamics practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 113(3), 501–527.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lebowitz, J. (1993). Boltzmann’s entropy and time’s arrow. Physics Today, 46, 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lesourne, J., & Godet, M. (1985). La fin des habitudes: les mille sentiers de l’avenir. Paris: Seghers.Google Scholar
  99. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
  100. Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Lotka, A. (1925). Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  102. Mannermaa, M. (1991). In search of an evolutionary paradigm for futures research. Futures, 23(4), 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Marcel, G. (1926). Journal métaphysique, 10.Google Scholar
  104. Marcel, G., & Segond, J. (1935). Être et avoir. Les Études philosophiques, 9(1/2), 48–53.Google Scholar
  105. Marchais-Roubelat, A., & Roubelat, F. (2011). Futures beyond disruptions: methodological reflections on scenario planning. Futures, 43(1), 130–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Martin, B., & Irvine, J. (1989). Research foresight: Priority-setting in science.Google Scholar
  107. Martino, J. (1983). Technological forecasting decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  108. Martino, J. (1987). Using precursors as leading indicators of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 32(4), 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Masini, E. (1993). Futures studies and the trends towards unity and diversity. International Social Science Journal, 45(3/137), 323–331.Google Scholar
  110. Masini, E. (1997). Gli studi sul futuro e l’Italia. FUTURIBILI.Google Scholar
  111. Masini, E. (2013). Estudios sobre el futuro: Métodos y prospectiva. Eleonora Barbieri Masini. Alma de los estudios de los futuros.Google Scholar
  112. Masini, E. B. (2013). Estudios sobre el futuro: Métodos y prospectiva, Eleonora Barbieri Masini. In A. A. Vásquez (Ed.), Alma de los estudios de los futuros. México, D.F.: Fundación Javier Barros Sierra.Google Scholar
  113. Massé, P. (1964). Les principes de la planification française. (W. Archiv, Ed.).Google Scholar
  114. Meadows, D., Goldsmith, E., & Meadow, P. (1972). Limits to growth (Vol. 381). CBC.Google Scholar
  115. Medina, J. (2003). Visión compartida de futuro. Universidad del Valle.Google Scholar
  116. Merleau-Ponty, M., & Bannan, J. (1956). What is phenomenology? CrossCurrents, 6(1), 59–70.Google Scholar
  117. Miles, I. (2005). Innovation in services.Google Scholar
  118. Miles, I., Harper, J., Georghiou, L., Keenan, M., & Popper, R. (2008). The many faces of foresight. The handbook of technology foresight: Concepts and practice.Google Scholar
  119. Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Flanagan, K., Huntink, W., et al. (1995). Knowledge-intensive business services: Users, carriers and sources of innovation.. European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS) Reports.Google Scholar
  120. Miles, I., Keenan, M., & Kaivo-Oja, J. (2002). Handbook of knowledge society foresight. Report for the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Manchester.Google Scholar
  121. Mill, J. (1884). Principles of political economy. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
  122. Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures, 39(4), 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Milliken, F. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Minkowski, M. (1911). Zur Physiologie der Sehsphäre. European Journal of Physiology, 141(4), 171–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Minkowski, M. (1928). Sur un cas d’aphasie chez un polyglotte. Revue neurologique.Google Scholar
  126. Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  127. Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Mondolfo, R. (1981). Heráclito: textos y problemas de su interpretación. Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  129. Nabus, B. (1982). QUEST—quick environmental scanning technique. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Nakićenović, N. (1991). Diffusion of pervasive systems: A case of transport infrastructures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39(1–2), 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Nakicenovic, N., & Yanagisawa, Y. (1995). On the RITE track: Technological responses to climate change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 48(1).Google Scholar
  132. Neef, A. (2005). The future of corporate innovation. Will there be an outsourcing endgame? The Foresight Company.Google Scholar
  133. Ogburn, W., & Thomas, D. (1922). Are inventions inevitable? A note on social evolution. Political Science Quarterly, 37(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Öner, M., & Karaca, F. (2016). Introduction: Modelling and simulation in futures studies. Futures, 81, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Parsons, T., & Shils, E. (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Pérez, G. (2007). Heráclito a la luz de Edgar Morin: de la complejidad de la naturaleza a la naturaleza de la complejidad (Vol. 9). (A. R. Filosofía, Ed.).Google Scholar
  137. Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  138. Porter, M. E. (1989). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. UK: Macmillan Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Porter, M., & Millar, V. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  140. Ramos, J. (2006). Dimensions in the confluence of futures studies and action research. Futures, 38(6), 642–655.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Rohrbeck, R., & Gemünden, H. (2011). Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 231–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Roubelat, F. (2000). Scenario planning as a networking process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(1), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Sánchez-Elvira, M., Torres, S., & Romero, F. (2009). Platón: La República.Google Scholar
  144. Sardar, Z. (2015). Postnormal times revisited. Futures, 67, 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Schneider, A., Wickert, C., & Marti, E. (2017). Reducing complexity by creating complexity: A systems theory perspective on how organizations respond to their environments. Journal of Management Studies, 54(2), 182–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Sharif, M. (1986). Measurement of technology for national development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 29(2), 119–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Sharif, M., & Haq, A. (1980). Evaluating the potentials of technical cooperation among developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Sharif, M., & Islam, M. N., M. (1982). A reliability engineering approach for forecasting technological breakthroughs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 21(1), 37–51.Google Scholar
  149. Sharif, M., & Sundararajan, V. (1983). A quantitative model for the evaluation of technological alternatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 24(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Sharif, M., & Sundararajan, V. (1984). Assessment of technological appropriateness: The case of Indonesian rural development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 25(3), 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decisionmaking processes in administrative organizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  152. Simon, H. (1997). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason (Vol. 3). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  153. Slaughter, R. (1987). Futures in education. Futures, 19(3), 341–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Slaughter, R. (1988). Recovering the future. Melbourne, VIC: Graduate School of Environmental Science, Monash University.Google Scholar
  155. Slaughter, R. (1989). Cultural reconstruction in the post-modern world. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(3), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Slaughter, R. (1991). Changing images of futures in the 20th century. Futures, 23(5), 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Slaughter, R. (1992). Encyclopedia of world problems and human potential. Brussels: Union of international associations.Google Scholar
  158. Slaughter, R. (1993). Inventing the future: Reflections on science, technology and nature. London: Adamantine Press.Google Scholar
  159. Slaughter, R. (1995). The foresight principle. London: Adamantine.Google Scholar
  160. Slaughter, R. (1996). Futures studies: From individual to social capacity. Futures, 28(8), 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Slaughter, R. (1998). Transcending flatland: Implications of Ken Wilber’s meta-narrative for futures studies. Futures, 30(6), 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Slaughter, R. (1999). Professional standards in futures work. Futures, 31(8), 835–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Son, H. (2015). The history of Western futures studies: An exploration of the intellectual traditions and three-phase periodization. Futures, 66, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Spencer, R. (2016). Platón, La República. Diánoia. Diánoia. Revista de Filosofía, 19(19), 215–216.Google Scholar
  165. Tarde, G. (1901). L’opinion et la foule. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  166. Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  167. The Millennium Project. (2017). Retrieved October 2, 2017, from The Millennium Project. An global futures studies and research. http://www.millennium-project.org.
  168. Thompson, J. (1974). Technology, polity, and societal development. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6–21.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Toffler, A. (1965). The future as a way of life. Horizon Magazine, 7(3).Google Scholar
  170. Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Amereon Ltd.Google Scholar
  171. Toffler, A. (1972). The futurists. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  172. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  173. Truffer, B., Voß, J., & Konrad, K. (2008). Mapping expectations for system transformations: Lessons from Sustainability Foresight in German utility sectors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(9), 1360–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Trujillo-Cabezas, R. (2008). El campo de los estudios de futuro: Contrastación entre el foresight y la prospectiva. Bogotá: Convenio Andrés Bello - Universidad Externado de Colombia.Google Scholar
  175. Tsoukas, H. (2017). Don’t simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 54(2), 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Van der Heijden, K. (2004). Can internally generated futures accelerate organizational learning? Futures, 36(2), 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Van Der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic.Google Scholar
  178. Van Hecke, A. (2003). Movimiento e inmovilidad: Heráclito y Zenón en Monterroso., 7, 9–49.Google Scholar
  179. Varet, G. (1961). Bibliographie de Gaston Berger (Vol. 16). Les Études philosophiques.Google Scholar
  180. Varum, C., & Melo, C. (2010). Directions in scenario planning literature—A review of the past decades. Futures, 42(4), 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Vickers, G. (1971). Changing ethics of distribution. Futures, 3(2), 116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Volterra, V. (1925). Variations and fluctuations of the numbers of individuals in animal species living together. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  183. Von Clausewitz, C., & Graham, J. (1873). On war (Vol. 1). London: N. Trübner and Company.Google Scholar
  184. Von Reibnitz, U., & Hammond, P. (1988). Scenario techniques. Hamburg: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  185. Vydra, A. (2014). Gaston Bachelard and his reactions to phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review, 47(1), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Well, H. (1902). Anticipations of the reaction of mechanical and scientific progress upon human life and thought. Philadelphia: Archibald Press.Google Scholar
  187. Wicks, A., & Freeman, R. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Winthrop, H. (1968). The sociologist and the study of the future. The American Sociologist, 136–145.Google Scholar
  189. Zwicky, F. (1962). Morphology of propulsive power (No. 1). Society for Morphological Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversidad Externado de ColombiaBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations