Skip to main content

Co-activation of Knee Muscles in Female vs. Male Adults

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019 (MEDICON 2019)

Abstract

During walking, knee joint mechanics is primarily regulated by thigh-muscle group, i.e. hamstrings and quadriceps femoris. Research purpose was to assess gender-related differences in concomitant recruitment of antagonist knee-joint muscles during ground walking. To this aim, Statistical gait analysis was performed on surface-electromyographic (sEMG) signals from vastus lateralis (VL) and medial hamstrings (MH) in 15 female (F-group) and 15 male (M-group) age-matched able-bodied young adults. sEMG signals from numerous strides (average value ± SD of 452 ± 102 strides for F-group and 440 ± 106 strides for M-group) were analyzed for each subject. Results showed that the same three VL/MH co-activations were found in the gait cycle, irrespective of gender: during early stance (ES), push-off (PO), and swing (SW) phase. No significant gender-related differences (p > 0.05) were observed in co-activity duration. Differently, an increase of occurrence frequency was observed in F-group for VL/MH co-activation during PO phase, with respect to M-group (21.9 ± 13.6% vs. 11.3 ± 8.6% of strides, p = 2.5 × 10−3). This increased occurrence of co-activations suggests a more complex muscular recruitment for knee-joint stabilization in females, in particular in PO phase when the control of balance is more awkward because of the final phase of single support. In conclusion, the present study indicates gender as a not negligible factor in evaluating knee-muscle co-activation during walking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Da Fonseca, S.T., Silva, P.L.P., Ocarino, J.M., et al.: Analyses of dynamic co-contraction level in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 14, 239–247 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kellis, E.: Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity. Sport Med. 25, 37–62 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strazza, A., Mengarelli, A., Fioretti, S., et al.: Surface-EMG analysis for the quantification of thigh muscle dynamic co-contractions during normal gait. Gait Posture 51, 228–233 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olney, S.J.: Quantitative evaluation of cocontraction of knee and ankle muscles in normal walking. In: Biomechanics IX: International Congress of Biomechanics, pp. 431–436 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosa, M.C.N., Marques, A., Demain, S., et al.: Methodologies to assess muscle co-contraction during gait in people with neurological impairment - a systematic literature review. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 24, 179–191 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmitz, A., Silder, A., Heiderscheit, B., et al.: Differences in lower-extremity muscular activation during walking between healthy older and young adults. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 19, 1085–1091 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hortobágyi, T., Solnik, S., Gruber, A., et al.: Interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation. Gait Posture 29, 558–564 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frost, G., Dowling, J., Dyson, K., Bar-Or, O.: Cocontraction in three age groups of children during treadmill locomotion. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 7, 179–186 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bohannon, R.W.: Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20–79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing 26, 15–19 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oberg, T., Karsznia, A., Oberg, K.: Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10–79 years of age. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 30, 210–223 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kerrigan, D.C., Todd, M.K., Della Croce, U.: Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 77, 2–7 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hurd, W.J., Chmielewski, T.L., Axe, M.J., et al.: Differences in normal and perturbed walking kinematics between male and female athletes. Clin. Biomech. 19, 465–472 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chumanov, E.S., Wall-Scheffler, C., Heiderscheit, B.C.: Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clin. Biomech. 23, 1260–1268 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Nardo, F., Mengarelli, A., Maranesi, E., et al.: Gender differences in the myoelectric activity of lower limb muscles in young healthy subjects during walking. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 19, 14–22 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiu, M.C., Wang, M.J.: The effect of gait speed and gender on perceived exertion, muscle activity, joint motion of lower extremity, ground reaction force and heart rate during normal walking. Gait Posture 25, 385–392 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mengarelli, A., Maranesi, E., Burattini, L., et al.: Co-contraction activity of ankle muscles during walking: a gender comparison. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 33, 1–9 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hermens, H.J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klugm, C., Rau, G.: Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 10, 361–374 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Agostini, V., Balestra, G., Knaflitz, M.: Segmentation and classification of gait cycles. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 946–952 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonato, P., D’Alessio, T., Knaflitz, M.: A statistical method for the measurement of muscle activation intervals from surface myoelectric signal during gait. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45, 287–299 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Nardo, F., Mengarelli, A., Strazza, A., et al.: A new parameter for quantifying the variability of surface electromyographic signals during gait: the occurrence frequency. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 36, 25–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Di Nardo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Di Nardo, F. et al. (2020). Co-activation of Knee Muscles in Female vs. Male Adults. In: Henriques, J., Neves, N., de Carvalho, P. (eds) XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019. MEDICON 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31635-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics