Skip to main content

Calculation of Breath-by-Breath Oxygen Uptake in Asthmatic Patients by the “Independent Breath” Algorithm. Comparison with a Classical Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019 (MEDICON 2019)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 76))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

Several computation algorithms are available to determine gas exchange on a breath-by-breath basis, each designed on the basis of different theoretical backgrounds, including the newly proposed “Independent breath” algorithm. The new algorithm was tested on the respiratory signals acquired from 11 asthmatic patients and 20 well-matched healthy controls, comparing results also with those provided by a “classical” algorithm commonly applied by other laboratories. Oxygen, carbon dioxide fractions, and ventilatory flow were recorded at the mouth continuously over 26 min in all the volunteers at rest, during unloaded and moderate intensity cycling and subsequent recovery. Average oxygen uptake values calculated for the 4 steady-state conditions (over 3 min), as well as the corresponding standard deviations, were not significantly different between the two groups of subjects (MANOVA, Group effect, p = ns). Almost all the average oxygen uptake values provided by the two algorithms were overlapping, the large majority lying within 5% from the identity line. The corresponding standard deviations obtained for the “Independent breath” algorithm were lower than those obtained for the “classical” algorithm (MANOVA, Algorithm effect, p < 0.001), the slope of the regression line between them amounting to 0.672. In conclusion, because of its better precision, with similar accuracy, compared to the “classical” real-time breath-by-breath algorithm, the use of the “Independent breath” algorithm should be recommended, also in asthmatic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Capelli, C., Cautero, M., Pogliaghi, S.: Algorithms, modelling and VO2 kinetics. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 111(3), 331–342 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Golja, P., Cettolo, V., Francescato, M.P.: Calculation algorithms for breath-by-breath alveolar gas exchange: the unknowns! Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 118(9), 1869–1876 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cettolo, V., Francescato, M.P.: Assessing breath-by-breath alveolar gas exchange: is the contiguity in time of breaths mandatory? Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 118(6), 1119–1130 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cettolo, V., Francescato, M.P.: Assessment of breath-by-breath alveolar gas exchange: an alternative view of the respiratory cycle. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 115(9), 1897–1904 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Francescato, M.P., Cettolo, V.: The “independent breath” algorithm: assessment of oxygen uptake during exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 119(2), 495–508 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roecker, K., Prettin, S., Sorichter, S.: Gas exchange measurements with high temporal resolution: the breath-by-breath approach. Int. J. Sports Med. 26, S11–S18 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ward, S.A.: Open-circuit respirometry: real-time, laboratory-based systems. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 118(5), 875–898 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanson, G.: Breath-to breath considerations for gas exchange kinetics. In: Cerretelli, P., Whipp, B.J. (eds.) Exercise Bioenergetics and Gas Exchange, p. 211–222. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Auchincloss, J.H.J., Gilbert, R., Baule, G.H.: Effect of ventilation on oxygen transfer during early exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 21(3), 810–818 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. di Prampero, P.E., Lafortuna, C.L.: Breath-by-breath estimate of alveolar gas transfer variability in man at rest and during exercise. J. Physiol. 415(1), 459–475 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grønlund, J.: A new method for breath-to-breath determination of oxygen flux across the alveolar membrane. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 52(2), 167–172 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fowler, W.S.: Lung function studies; the respiratory dead space. Am. J. Physiol. 154(3), 405–416 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Francescato, M.P., Cettolo, V., Bellio, R.: Assembling more O2 uptake responses: is it possible to merely stack the repeated transitions? Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 200, 46–49 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Cortex GmbH (Liepzig, Germany) for having provided us with the metabolic unit. Cortex GmbH was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation.

This experimentation was conducted with the unconditioned support of the ALPI Association (Association for the Pediatric Allergies and Pneumopaties), Udine (Italy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Pia Francescato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

None of the authors has conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Francescato, M.P., Ajčević, M., Cettolo, V., Canciani, M., Accardo, A. (2020). Calculation of Breath-by-Breath Oxygen Uptake in Asthmatic Patients by the “Independent Breath” Algorithm. Comparison with a Classical Approach. In: Henriques, J., Neves, N., de Carvalho, P. (eds) XV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing – MEDICON 2019. MEDICON 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31634-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31635-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics