Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Easy to Read (E2R) and Access for All (A4A): A Step to Determine the Understandability and Accessibility of Websites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications in Ubiquitous Computing

Part of the book series: EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing ((EAISICC))

Abstract

Online travel agency (OTA) plays a crucial role in travel and tourism business for the dissemination of information from business to customer (B2C) to plan, contrast, decide, and book their travel-related product and service online. However, it could be only possible when their websites are easily accessible, understandable, and readable for all the users especially persons with disabilities (PwDs). This study addresses the importance and issues of web accessibility and readability of OTA websites, their relevance, and rankings with corporations to find their overall performance regarding accessible tourism perspective. Using multiple online automatic evaluation tools based on WCAG 2.0 guidelines to analyze 35 OTA websites belongs to three US international corporations. Based on the result obtained, the ranking comparison of websites conducted and suggestions are provided to enhance their rankings in terms of attributes used. Finally, some implications regarding the identified issues are discussed and further enhancement of the work is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.bookingholdings.com/

  2. 2.

    https://www.expediagroup.com/

  3. 3.

    https://www.tripadvisor.com

  4. 4.

    https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/

  5. 5.

    https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/

  6. 6.

    https://www.webfx.com/tools/read-able/, a full-service digital market agency.

  7. 7.

    https://smallseotools.com/Alexa-rank-checker/

  8. 8.

    https://wave.webaim.org/

  9. 9.

    https://tenon.io/

  10. 10.

    https://www.webfx.com/tools/read-able/

References

  1. AChecker. (2019). Web accessibility checker. Available at: https://achecker.ca/checker/index.php. Accessed 15 Apr 2019.

  2. Adam, A., & Kreps, D. (2009). Disability and discourses of web accessibility. Information, Communication & Society, 12(7), 1041–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alayed, A., Wald, M., & Draffan, E. A. (2016). A framework for the development of localised web accessibility guidelines for university websites in Saudi Arabia. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction (Methods, techniques, and best practices, pp. 3–13). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Alén, E., Domínguez, T., & Losada, N. (2012). New opportunities for the tourism market: Senior tourism and accessible tourism. In Visions for global tourism industry-creating and sustaining competitive strategies. Rijeka: IntechOpen.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ballesteros, E., Ribera, M., Pascual, A., & Granollers, T. (2015). Reflections and proposals to improve the efficiency of accessibility efforts. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4), 583–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bi, Y., Card, J. A., & Cole, S. T. (2007). Accessibility and attitudinal barriers encountered by Chinese travellers with physical disabilities. International Journal of Tourism Research, 9(3), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bisht, P. (2019). Online travel market report. Available at: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/online-travel-market. Accessed 12 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bowtell, J. (2015). Assessing the value and market attractiveness of the accessible tourism industry in Europe: A focus on major travel and leisure companies. Journal of Tourism Futures, 1(3), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buhalis, D. (1998). Information technologies in tourism: Implications for the tourism curriculum. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 1998 (pp. 289–297). Wien: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Buhalis, D. (2003). eTourism: Information technology for strategic tourism management. London, UK: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2008). Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the internet—The state of eTourism research. Tourism Management, 29(4), 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buhalis, D., & Michopoulou, E. (2011). Information-enabled tourism destination marketing: Addressing the accessibility market. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(2), 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buhalis, D., & O’Connor, P. (2005). Information communication technology revolutionizing tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 30(3), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buhalis, D., Eichhorn, V., Michopoulou, E., & Miller, G. (2005). Accessibility market and stakeholder analysis. University of Surrey y One Stop Shop for Accessible Tourism in Europe (OSSATE).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burger, F., Kroiß, P., Pröll, B., Richtsfeld, R., Sighart, H., & Starck, H. (1997). Tis@ web-database supported tourist information on the web. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 1997 (pp. 180–189). Wien/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Connolly, D. J., Olsen, M. D., & Moore, R. G. (1998). The internet as a distribution channel. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39(4), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dale, C. (2003). The competitive networks of tourism e-mediaries: New strategies, new advantages. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 9(2), 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Darcy, S. (2010). Inherent complexity: Disability, accessible tourism and accommodation information preferences. Tourism Management, 31(6), 816–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Darcy, S., Cameron, B., Pegg, S., et al. (2011). Developing a business case for accessible tourism. In Accessible tourism: Concepts and issues (pp. 241–259). Bristol/Toronto: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Disability Rights Commission. (2004). The web: Access and inclusion for disabled people; a formal investigation. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Domínguez Vila, T., Alén González, E., & Darcy, S. (2018). Website accessibility in the tourism industry: An analysis of official national tourism organization websites around the world. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(24), 2895–2906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Domínguez Vila, T., Alén González, E., & Darcy, S. (2019). Accessible tourism online resources: A northern European perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 19(2), 140–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. Online Submission.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eichhorn, V., Miller, G., Michopoulou, E., & Buhalis, D. (2008). Enabling access to tourism through information schemes? Annals of Tourism Research, 35(1), 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ENAT. (2013). Accessibility review of European national tourist boards’ websites 2012. Available at: https://www.accessibletourism.org/resources/enat-nto-websites-study-2012_public.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2019.

  26. Gonçalves, R., Martins, J., Pereira, J., Oliveira, M. A. Y., & Ferreira, J. J. P. (2013). Enterprise web accessibility levels amongst the forbes 250: Where art thou o virtuous leader? Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gutierrez, C. F., Loucopoulos, C., & Reinsch, R. W. (2005). Disability-accessibility of airlines’ web sites for us reservations online. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(4), 239–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanna, J., & Millar, R. (1997). Promoting tourism on the internet. Tourism Management, 18(7), 469–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho, C. I., & Lee, Y. L. (2007). The development of an e-travel service quality scale. Tourism Management, 28(6), 1434–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hyun, J., Moon, J., & Hong, K. (2008). Longitudinal study on web accessibility compliance of government websites in Korea. In S. Lee, H. Choo, S. Ha, & I. C. Shin (Eds.), Computer-human interaction (pp. 396–404). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Inal, Y., Rızvanoğlu, K., & Yesilada, Y. (2017). Web accessibility in Turkey: Awareness, understanding and practices of user experience professionals. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ismail, A., & Kuppusamy, K. S. (2016). Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: An exploratory study. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 268–278.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ismail, A., & Kuppusamy, K. S. (2019). Web accessibility investigation and identification of major issues of higher education websites with statistical measures: A case study of college websites. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K. S., Kumar, A., & Ojha, P. K. (2017). Connect the dots: Accessibility, readability and site ranking-an investigation with reference to top ranked websites of government of india. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 528–540.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K. S., & Nengroo, A. S. (2018). Multi-tool accessibility assessment of government department websites: A case-study with JKGAD. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(6), 504–516.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K. S., & Paiva, S. (2019). Accessibility analysis of higher education institution websites of Portugal. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ismailova, R., & Kimsanova, G. (2017). Universities of the Kyrgyz republic on the web: Accessibility and usability. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(4), 1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0481-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jeong, M., & Lambert, C. (1999). Measuring the information quality on lodging web sites. International Journal of Hospitality Information Technology, 1(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaynama, S. A., & Black, C. I. (2000). A proposal to assess the service quality of online travel agencies: An exploratory study. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 21(1), 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kingman, A. (2018). A brief history of WCAG. Available at: https://lastcallmedia.com/blog/brief-history-wcag. Accessed 17 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Law, R., & Hsu, C. H. (2005). Customers’ perceptions on the importance of hotel web site dimensions and attributes. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17(6), 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Law, R., Qi, S., & Buhalis, D. (2010). Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research. Tourism Management, 31(3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lukaitis, A., & Davey, B. (2012). Web design for mature-aged travellers: Readability as a design issue. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 6(2), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maswera, T., Dawson, R., & Edwards, J. (2005). Analysis of usability and accessibility errors of e-commerce websites of tourist organisations in four African countries. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2005 (pp. 531–542).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Maurer, R. (2018). Number of federal website accessibility lawsuits nearly triple, exceeding 2250 in 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mills, J. E., Han, J. H., & Clay, J. M. (2008). Accessibility of hospitality and tourism websites: A challenge for visually impaired persons. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 49(1), 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. Berkeley: New Riders Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  48. O’Connor, P., & Frew, A. J. (2004). An evaluation methodology for hotel electronic channels of distribution. International Journal of Hospitality management, 23(2), 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. O’Connor, P. (2004). Privacy and the online travel customer: An analysis of privacy policy content, use and compliance by online travel agencies (A. J. Frew, ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag New York.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Oertel, B., Hasse, C., Scheermesser, M., Thio, S. L., & Feil, T. (2004). Accessibility of tourism web sites within the European Union. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on information and communication Technologies in Tourism (ENTER 2004) (pp. 358–368). Cairo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ojha, P. K., Ismail, A., & Kuppusamy, K. S. (2018). Perusal of readability with focus on web content understandability. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. O’reilly, T. (2007). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & strategies, 65(1), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  53. O’reilly, T. (2009). What is web 2.0. Massachusetts, USA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Outlaw. (2011). Disabled access to websites under UK law. Available at: https://www.out-law.com/page-330. Accessed 01 May 2019.

  55. Paciello, M. (2000). Web accessibility for people with disabilities. Florida, USA: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pashkevich, A., & Stjernström, O. (2014). Making Russian arctic accessible for tourists: Analysis of the institutional barriers. Polar Geography, 37(2), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Philstar. (2019). 5 ways online travel agencies make traveling a lot easier. Available at: https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/travel-and-tourism/2016/12/30/1658089/5-ways-online-travel-agencies-make-traveling-lot-easier. Accessed 10 May 2019.

  59. Poon, A., et al. (1993). Tourism, technology and competitive strategies. Wallingford: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ritchie, H., & Blanck, P. (2003). The promise of the internet for disability: A study of on-line services and web site accessibility at centers for independent living. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Schegg, R., Liebrich, A., Scaglione, M., & Ahmad, S. F. S. (2008). An exploratory field study of web 2.0 in tourism. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2008 (pp. 152–163).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sheldon, P. J., et al. (1997). Tourism information technology. Wallingford: Cab International.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Shi, Y. (2006). The accessibility of queensland visitor information centres’ websites. Tourism Management, 27(5), 829–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Massachusetts, USA: Pearson Education India.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sigala, M. (2007). Web 2.0 in the tourism industry: A new tourism generation and new e-business models. Greece: Travel Daily News.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sigala, M. (2012). Web 2.0 and customer involvement in new service development: A framework, cases and implications in tourism. In Web (Vol. 2, pp. 25–38).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Smith, R. W. (1987). Leisure of disable tourists: Barriers to participation. Annals of Tourism Research, 14(3), 376–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Smith, C., Jenner, P., et al. (1998). Tourism and the internet. Travel & Tourism Analyst, 1(1), 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Staszak, J. (2018). Three stock experts take on the online travel world. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/moneyshow/2018/03/16/three-stock-experts-take-on-the-online-travel-world/#4b1210b796ab. Accessed 01 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sussmann, S., & Baker, M. (1996). Responding to the electronic marketplace: Lessons from destination management systems. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 15(2), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tjoa, A. M., & Werthner, H. (1996). Interfacing WWW with distributed database applications in the field of tourism. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism (pp. 78–85). Wien: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  72. Toms, E. G., & Taves, A. R. (2004). Measuring user perceptions of web site reputation. Information Processing & Management, 40(2), 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. UN. (2006). United nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Available at: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2019.

  74. UNWTO. (2013). Recommendations on accessible tourism. Available at: http://cf.cdn.unwto.org/sites/all/files/pdf/unwto_recommendations_on_accessible_tourism.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  75. UNWTO. (2016). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and best practices. Available at: https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284418077. Accessed 14 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  76. UNWTO. (2016). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and best practices. Available at: http://cf.cdn.unwto.org/sites/all/files/docpdf/moduleieng13022017.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  77. UNWTO. (2016). Tourism for all – promoting universal accessibility. Available at: https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284418138. Accessed 17 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Vera, C. L. (2018). The true cost of universal accessibility. Available at: https://uxdesign.cc/the-true-cost-of-universal-accessibility-7e496d678a9f. Accessed 17 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Vila, T. D., González, E. A., & Darcy, S. (2019). Accessibility of tourism websites: The level of countries’ commitment. In Universal Access in the Information Society (pp. 1–16).

    Google Scholar 

  80. W3C. (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505/wai-pageauth.html. Accessed 17 May 2019.

  81. W3C. (2008). Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.0. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/. Accessed 01 May 2019.

  82. W3C. (2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.1. Available at: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 01 May 2019.

  83. W3C. (2019). Introduction to web accessibility. Available at: https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-intro/#context. Accessed 10 May 2019.

  84. Waldron, V. R., Lavitt, M., & Kelley, D. (2000). The nature and prevention of harm in technology-mediated self-help settings: Three exemplars. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 17(2–3), 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Wang, Y. S., & Tang, T. I. (2004). Assessing customer perceptions of web site service quality in digital marketing environments. In Advanced topics in end user computing (Vol. 3, pp. 16–35). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Watch, M. (2019). Online travel agency (OTA) market to witness huge growth by 2025. Available at: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/online-travel-agency-ota-market-to-witness-huge-growth-by-2025-booking-holdings-tripadvisor-expedia-homeaway-makemytrip-kayak-qunr-2019-03-09. Accessed 09 May 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Wen, I. (2009). Factors affecting the online travel buying decision: A review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(6), 752–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Williams, R., & Rattray, R. (2005). UK hotel web page accessibility for disabled and challenged users. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5(3), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Williams, R., Rattray, R., & Stork, A. (2004). Web site accessibility of German and UK tourism information sites. European Business Review, 16(6), 577–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Williams, R., Rattray, R., & Grimes, A. (2006). Meeting the on-line needs of disabled tourists: An assessment of UK-based hotel websites. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Williams, R., Rattray, R., & Grimes, A. (2007). Online accessibility and information needs of disabled tourists: A three country hotel sector analysis. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(2), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  92. World Health Organization, et al. (2011). World report on disability 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  93. Xiong, L., Cobanoglu, C., Cummings, P., & DeMicco, F. (2009). Website accessibility of US based hospitality websites. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009 (pp. 273–284).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet shopping site (sitequal). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(1), 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Tourism Studies, School of Management, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India

    Ranjit Singh

  2. Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Technology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India

    Abid Ismail

Authors
  1. Ranjit Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abid Ismail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, I K Gujral Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, Punjab, India

    Raman Kumar

  2. Inst Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal

    Sara Paiva

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, R., Ismail, A. (2021). Easy to Read (E2R) and Access for All (A4A): A Step to Determine the Understandability and Accessibility of Websites. In: Kumar, R., Paiva, S. (eds) Applications in Ubiquitous Computing. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35280-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35280-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35279-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35280-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation