Abstract
Blockchains has redefined the way software industry’s core mechanisms operate. Advent of blockchains have intrigued the industry and research community by the properties like immutability, reliability and availability it adheres. Since then, community has observed extensive research to make this technology viable and replace the existing computing paradigms. Blockchain technology promises global, immutable, self-governed system of records with no intermediaries. Technology with such properties have strong use cases where a secure audit trail is quintessential. But the performance of blockchains is not at par with the existing industry standards making industry reluctant to surge towards the blockchains. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis on the recent approaches used to enhance the performance of blockchain systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De Caro, A., Enyeart, D., Ferris, C., Laventman, G., Manevich, Y., Muralidharan, S., Murthy, C., Nguyen, B., Sethi, M., Singh, G., Smith, K., Sorniotti, A., Stathakopoulou, C., Vukolić, M., Cocco, S.W., Yellick, J.: Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth EuroSys Conference, pp. 30:1–30:15. ACM, New York (2018)
Berger, C., Reiser, H.P.: Scaling Byzantine consensus: a broad analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Scalable and Resilient Infrastructures for Distributed Ledgers, pp. 13–18. ACM, New York (2018)
Bowe, S., Gabizon, A., Green, M.D.: A multi-party protocol for constructing the public parameters of the Pinocchio zk-SNARK. In: Zohar, A., et al. (eds.) Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2018. LNCS, vol. 10958. Springer, Heidelberg (2019)
Castro, M., Liskov, B.: Practical Byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 20, 398–461 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/571637.571640
Dannen, C.: Introducing Ethereum and Solidity: Foundations of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Programming for Beginners. Apress, Berkeley (2017)
Distler, T., Cachin, C., Kapitza, R.: Resource-efficient Byzantine fault tolerance. IEEE Trans. Comput. 65, 2807–2819 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2015.2495213
Eberhardt, J., Heiss, J.: Off-chaining models and approaches to off-chain computations. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Scalable and Resilient Infrastructures for Distributed Ledgers, pp. 7–12. ACM, New York (2018)
Eberhardt, J., Tai, S.: On or Off the blockchain? Insights on off-chaining computation and data. In: De Paoli, F., Schulte, S., Broch Johnsen, E. (eds.) Service-Oriented and Cloud Computing, pp. 3–15. Springer (2017)
Gilad, Y., Hemo, R., Micali, S., Vlachos, G., Zeldovich, N.: Algorand: scaling byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies. In: Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 51–68. ACM, New York (2017)
Goldreich, O., Micali, S., Wigderson, A.: Proofs That yield nothing but their validity or all languages in NP have zero-knowledge proof systems. J. ACM 38, 690–728 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1145/116825.116852
Hopwood, D., Bowe, S., Hornby, T., Wilcox, N.: Zcash protocol specification. Technical report 2016–1.10. Zerocoin Electric Coin Company (2016)
Kapitza, R., Behl, J., Cachin, C., Distler, T., Kuhnle, S., Mohammadi, S.V., Schröder-Preikschat, W., Stengel, K.: CheapBFT: resource-efficient byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems, pp. 295–308. ACM, New York (2012)
Kotla, R., Alvisi, L., Dahlin, M., Clement, A., Wong, E.: Zyzzyva: speculative Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of Twenty-first ACM SIGOPS Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 45–58. ACM, New York (2007)
Li, P., Wang, G., Chen, X., Xu, W.: Gosig: scalable byzantine consensus on adversarial wide area network for blockchains. arXiv:1802.01315 (2018)
Li, W., Sforzin, A., Fedorov, S., Karame, G.O.: Towards scalable and private industrial blockchains. In: Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies and Contracts, pp. 9–14. ACM, New York (2017)
Liu, J., Li, W., Karame, G.O., Asokan, N.: Scalable Byzantine consensus via hardware-assisted secret sharing. IEEE Trans. Comput. 68, 139–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2018.2860009
Micali, S., Rabin, M., Vadhan, S.: Verifiable random functions. In: 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No. 99CB37039), pp. 120–130. IEEE Comput. Soc., New York (1999)
Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008)
Schnorr, C.P.: Efficient signature generation by smart cards. J. Cryptol. 4, 161–174 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00196725
Syta, E., Tamas, I., Visher, D., Wolinsky, D.I., Jovanovic, P., Gasser, L., Gailly, N., Khoffi, I., Ford, B.: Keeping authorities “honest or bust” with decentralized witness cosigning. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 526–545 (2016)
Yang, Y.: LinBFT: linear-communication byzantine fault tolerance for public blockchains (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shukla, P.A., Samet, S. (2020). Systematization of Knowledge on Scalability Aspect of Blockchain Systems. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1129. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39445-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39445-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39444-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39445-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)