Abstract
Increasing urbanization and the simultaneous growth of car-based individual transport pose major challenges for many cities. On the one hand, streets and parking facilities are reaching their capacity limits, and on the other hand, car emissions are a burden for both residents and environment. A transformation from one-person car use to emission-free shared mobility could be part of the solution. Small autonomous, electrified shuttle buses, which can carry 10–15 people on-demand, are already in the technical development stage. At present, however, many questions remain unanswered regarding the design of mobility services around the technological platform. This paper therefore explores which factors influence the willingness to share rides and to abandon private car ownership. While for the willingness to use ridesharing, especially the familiarity with the passengers and, to a small extent, the purpose of the trip has an influence, the expected advantages in terms of flexibility and costs are particularly important for the willingness to abandon a car. A positive attitude towards conventional car driving counteracts both measures surveyed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Briggs, D., de Hoogh, K., Morris, C., Gulliver, J.: Effects of travel mode on exposures to particulate air pollution. Environ. Int. 34, 12–22 (2008)
European Commission: Annual Accident Report 2018. European Road Safety Observatory. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota/asr2018.pdf, last accessed 06 Feb 2020
Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Chan, N., Bansal, A.: Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes. In: Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning, pp. 237–262 (2020)
Michałowska, M., Ogłoziński, M.: Autonomous vehicles and road safety. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 191–202 (2017)
Davis, F.: A Technology Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston (1985)
Lee, C., Ward, C., Raue, M., D’Ambrosio, L., Coughlin, J.: Age differences in acceptance of self-driving cars: a survey of perceptions and attitudes. In: Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Aging, Design and User Experience, pp. 3–13 (2017)
König, M., Neumayr, L.: Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: the case of the self-driving car. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 44, 42–52 (2017)
Hulse, L., Xie, H., Galea, E.: Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Saf. Sci. 102, 1–13 (2018)
Philipsen, R., Brell, T., Ziefle, M.: Carriage without a driver – user requirements for intelligent autonomous mobility services. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 339–350 (2018)
Hohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., Welpe, I.: How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94, 374–385 (2016)
Choi, J., Ji, Y.: Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31, 692–702 (2015)
Moták, L., Neuville, E., Chambres, P., Marmoiton, F., Monéger, F., Coutarel, F., Izaute, M.: Antecedent variables of intentions to use an autonomous shuttle: moving beyond TAM and TPB? Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 67, 269–278 (2017)
Stoiber, T., Schubert, I., Hoerler, R., Burger, P.: Will consumers prefer shared and pooled-use autonomous vehicles? A stated choice experiment with Swiss households. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 71, 265–282 (2019)
Distler, V., Lallemand, C., Bellet, T.: Acceptability and acceptance of autonomous mobility on demand. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2018 (2018)
Nordhoff, S., de Winter, J., Payre, W., van Arem, B., Happee, R.: What impressions do users have after a ride in an automated shuttle? An interview study. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 63, 252–269 (2019)
Nordhoff, S., de Winter, J., Madigan, R., Merat, N., van Arem, B., Happee, R.: User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: a questionnaire study. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 58, 843–854 (2018)
Wintersberger, P., Frison, A., Riener, A.: Man vs. Machine. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI 2018 (2018)
Roche-Cerasi, I.: Public acceptance of driverless shuttles in Norway. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 66, 162–183 (2019)
Salonen, A.: Passenger’s subjective traffic safety, in-vehicle security and emergency management in the driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Transp. Policy 61, 106–110 (2018)
Herrenkind, B., Brendel, A., Nastjuk, I., Greve, M., Kolbe, L.: Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 74, 255–276 (2019)
Nobis, C., Kuhnimhof, T.: Mobilität in Deutschland - MiD Ergebnisbericht. In: Studie von infas, DLR, IVT und infas 360 im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (FE-Nr. 70.904/15). Bonn, Berlin (2018)
Neyer, F., Felber, J., Gebhardt, C.: Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft. Diagnostica. 58, 87–99 (2012)
Beierlein, C., Kovaleva, A., Kemper, C.J., Rammstedt, B.: Kurzskala zur Erfassung der Risikobereitschaft (R-1). In: Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS) (2015)
Cortina, J.: What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J. Appl. Psychol. 78, 98–104 (1993)
Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt: Private Halter von Personenkraftwagen (2014). https://www.kba.de/DE/Statistik/Fahrzeuge/Neuzulassungen/Halter/2014/2014_kurzbericht_halter_n_pdf.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=6. Accessed 06 Feb 2020
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI) within the funding guideline “Automated and Connected Driving” under the grant number 16AVF2134B. The authors thank all participants for sharing opinions on a novel technology. Furthermore, thanks go to Susanne Gohr for research assistance, to Dr. Johanna Kluge, Dr. Simon Himmel, and Julian Hildebrandt for valuable research advice, as well as to the icon of outlaw country for inspiring the paper title.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Philipsen, R., Brell, T., Biermann, H., Ziefle, M. (2020). On the Road Again - Explanatory Factors for the Users’ Willingness to Replace Private Cars by Autonomous on-Demand Shuttle Services. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50942-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50943-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)