Abstract
There are always submerged risks involved with advanced technology; therefore, it is necessary for policymakers, inventors and technology companies to scrutinise potential risks when they consider implementing new technology. This paper attempts to extract generic lessons from a failure relevant to autonomous transport systems. We use fault tree analysis (FTA), a reliability block diagram (RBD) approach and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), for analysing a fatal pedestrian accident caused by a level-3 self-driving car in 2018. The work highlights the importance of prematurity of test driving self-driving cars on public roads and the potential of an insightful analysis method that can capture human factors. In this work we theorise accident reporting systems, and provide a framework for triple loop learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Leoncini, R.: Learning-by-failing An empirical exercise on CIS data. Res. Policy 45(2), 376–386 (2016)
Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan. 43, 354–363 (2010)
Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27(2–3), 183–213 (1997)
Hatamura Y.: Evacuation and decontamination in response to the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. In: The 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Woodhead Publishing, Boston (2015)
Leveson, N.: A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42(4), 237–270 (2004)
Hollnagel, E.: Barriers and accident prevention. Routledge. (2016)
Lim, H.S.M., Taeihagh, A.: Autonomous vehicles for smart and sustainable cities: an in-depth exploration of privacy and cybersecurity implications. Energies 11(5), 1062 (2018)
Department for Transport: The Pathway to Driverless Cars: Summary report and action plan (2015). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/401562/pathway-driverless-cars-ummary.pdf. Accessed Feb 2015
Cabinet Secretariat: 日本再生戦略 [Japan revitalization strategy] (2012). https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/npu/pdf/20120731/20120731.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2012
Nakata, A.: 年に急増した自動運転車の事故一覧、米カリフォルニア州で50件超. NIKKEI x TECH (2018). https://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/atcl/nxt/column/18/00155/110500034. Accessed 7 Nov 2018
Baldwin, J., Lin, Z.: Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Res. Policy 31(1), 1–18 (2002)
D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., von Tunzelmann, N.: What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Res. Policy 41(2), 482–488 (2012)
Galia, F., Legros, D.: Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France. Res. Policy 33(8), 1185–1199 (2004)
Lhuillery, S., Pfister, E.: R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Res. Policy 38(1), 45–57 (2009)
Hulme, A., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Waterson, P., Salmon, P.M.: What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018. Saf. Sci. 117, 164–183 (2019)
Goode, N., Salmon, P.M., Lenne, M., Finch, C.: Translating Systems Thinking into Practice: A Guide to Developing Incident Reporting Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)
Drupsteen, L., Guldenmund, F.W.: What is learning? A review of the safety literature to define learning from incidents, accidents and disasters. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 22(2), 81–96 (2014)
Argyris, C., Schön, D.: What is an organization that it may learn. In: Argyris, C, Schoen, D.A. (eds.) Organizational Learning: A Theory Perspective, pp. 8–29. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1978)
Aven, T.: A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92(6), 745–754 (2007)
Cope, J.: Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection: discontinuous events as triggers for ‘higher-level’learning. Manage. Learn. 34(4), 429–450 (2003)
Argyris, C.: On Organizational Learning, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden, MA (1999)
Tosey, P., Visser, M., Saunders, M.N.: The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: a critical review. Manage. Learn. 43(3), 291–307 (2012)
Weick, K.E.: The generative properties of richness. Acad. Manage. J. 50(1), 14–19 (2007)
Wakabayashi, D.: Self-driving Uber car kills pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam. The New York Times. Accessed 19 Mar 2018
Griggs, T., Wakabayashi, D.: How a self-driving Uber killed a pedestrian in Arizona. The New York Times. Accessed 21 Mar 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Labib, A., Nagase, Y., Hadleigh‐Dunn, S. (2020). Analysis of Human Factors Failures in an Incident of Self-driving Car Accident. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50942-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50943-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)