Skip to main content

Analysis of Human Factors Failures in an Incident of Self-driving Car Accident

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1212))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There are always submerged risks involved with advanced technology; therefore, it is necessary for policymakers, inventors and technology companies to scrutinise potential risks when they consider implementing new technology. This paper attempts to extract generic lessons from a failure relevant to autonomous transport systems. We use fault tree analysis (FTA), a reliability block diagram (RBD) approach and failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), for analysing a fatal pedestrian accident caused by a level-3 self-driving car in 2018. The work highlights the importance of prematurity of test driving self-driving cars on public roads and the potential of an insightful analysis method that can capture human factors. In this work we theorise accident reporting systems, and provide a framework for triple loop learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leoncini, R.: Learning-by-failing An empirical exercise on CIS data. Res. Policy 45(2), 376–386 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan. 43, 354–363 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27(2–3), 183–213 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hatamura Y.: Evacuation and decontamination in response to the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. In: The 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Woodhead Publishing, Boston (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leveson, N.: A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42(4), 237–270 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollnagel, E.: Barriers and accident prevention. Routledge. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lim, H.S.M., Taeihagh, A.: Autonomous vehicles for smart and sustainable cities: an in-depth exploration of privacy and cybersecurity implications. Energies 11(5), 1062 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Department for Transport: The Pathway to Driverless Cars: Summary report and action plan (2015). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/401562/pathway-driverless-cars-ummary.pdf. Accessed Feb 2015

  9. Cabinet Secretariat: 日本再生戦略 [Japan revitalization strategy] (2012). https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/npu/pdf/20120731/20120731.pdf. Accessed 31 Jul 2012

  10. Nakata, A.: 年に急増した自動運転車の事故一覧、米カリフォルニア州で50件超. NIKKEI x TECH (2018). https://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/atcl/nxt/column/18/00155/110500034. Accessed 7 Nov 2018

  11. Baldwin, J., Lin, Z.: Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Res. Policy 31(1), 1–18 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., von Tunzelmann, N.: What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Res. Policy 41(2), 482–488 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galia, F., Legros, D.: Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France. Res. Policy 33(8), 1185–1199 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lhuillery, S., Pfister, E.: R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data. Res. Policy 38(1), 45–57 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hulme, A., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Waterson, P., Salmon, P.M.: What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018. Saf. Sci. 117, 164–183 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goode, N., Salmon, P.M., Lenne, M., Finch, C.: Translating Systems Thinking into Practice: A Guide to Developing Incident Reporting Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Drupsteen, L., Guldenmund, F.W.: What is learning? A review of the safety literature to define learning from incidents, accidents and disasters. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 22(2), 81–96 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Argyris, C., Schön, D.: What is an organization that it may learn. In: Argyris, C, Schoen, D.A. (eds.) Organizational Learning: A Theory Perspective, pp. 8–29. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aven, T.: A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92(6), 745–754 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cope, J.: Entrepreneurial learning and critical reflection: discontinuous events as triggers for ‘higher-level’learning. Manage. Learn. 34(4), 429–450 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Argyris, C.: On Organizational Learning, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden, MA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tosey, P., Visser, M., Saunders, M.N.: The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: a critical review. Manage. Learn. 43(3), 291–307 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weick, K.E.: The generative properties of richness. Acad. Manage. J. 50(1), 14–19 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wakabayashi, D.: Self-driving Uber car kills pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam. The New York Times. Accessed 19 Mar 2018

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griggs, T., Wakabayashi, D.: How a self-driving Uber killed a pedestrian in Arizona. The New York Times. Accessed 21 Mar 2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashraf Labib .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Labib, A., Nagase, Y., Hadleigh‐Dunn, S. (2020). Analysis of Human Factors Failures in an Incident of Self-driving Car Accident. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50942-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50943-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics