Abstract
Studies on contemporary submarine control room configurations revealed a bottleneck of information transition. The co-location of operators dependent on each other for task-relevant information relieved this, however, the impact of operator co-location on subjective Situation Awareness (SA) was not assessed. In the current work, half of the teams from the baseline study and half of the teams from the co-location configuration were evaluated on two SA questions: (1) “Rate the awareness of the total number of vessels surrounding the submarine” and (2) “How many vessels did the entire command team encounter during the scenario?”. Participants completed high and low demand Return to Periscope Depth scenarios and responded to the SA questions immediately after finishing each scenario. Results indicate that operator SA decreased in the high demand scenarios regardless of control room configuration type. Furthermore, operator SA was greater in the co-location configuration than in the baseline study (contemporary configuration).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Stanton, N.A.: Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth. Ergonomics 57, 403–418 (2014)
Fay, D., Stanton, N.A., Roberts, A.P.J.: All at sea with user interfaces: from evolutionary to ecological design for submarine combat systems. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 20, 632–658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2019.1582115
Roberts, A.P.J., Stanton, N.A., Fay, D.: The command team experimental test-bed phase two: assessing cognitive load and situation awareness in a submarine control room. In: Stanton, N.A., Landry, S., di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 427–437. Springer, Cham (2017)
Bateman, S.: Perils of the deep: the dangers of submarine proliferation in the seas of east Asia. Asian Secur. 7, 61–84 (2011)
Mansell, T., Tynan, A., Kershaw, D.: Investigating the network enabled conventional submarine: an Australian perspective. Undersea Def. Technol. Pacific. 436 (2003)
Dominguez, C., Long, W.G., Miller, T.E., Wiggins, S.L.: Design directions for support of submarine commanding officer decision making. In: Proceedings of 2006 Undersea HSI Symposium: Research, Acquisition and the Warrior, pp. 6–8 (2006)
Stanton, N.A., Stewart, R., Harris, D., Houghton, R.J., Baber, C., McMaster, R., Salmon, P.M., Hoyle, G., Walker, G.H., Young, M.S.: Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics 49, 1288–1311 (2006)
Walker, G., Salmon, P., Green, D., Stanton, N., Baber, C.: Toward a theory of agent-based systemic situational awareness. In: Vincenzi, D.A., Mouloua, M., and Hancock, P.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation Conference (HPSAAII), LEA, Mahwah, NJ, 22–25 March 2004, pp. 83–87. Daytona Beach (2004)
Stanton, N.A., Roberts, A.P.J., Fay, D.T.: Up periscope: understanding submarine command and control teamwork during a simulated return to periscope depth. Cogn. Technol. Work 19, 399–417 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0413-7
Roberts, A.P.J., Stanton, N.A., Fay, D.: Land ahoy! understanding submarine command and control during the completion of inshore operations. Hum. Factors 59, 1263–1288 (2017)
Roberts, A.P.J., Stanton, N.A., Fay, D.: Go deeper, go deeper: understanding submarine command and control during the completion of dived tracking operations. Appl. Ergon. 69, 162–175 (2018)
Stanton, N.A., Roberts, A.P.J.: Examining social, information, and task networks in submarine command and control. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 48, 252–265 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2720659
Kirschenbaum, S.S., McInnis, S.L., Correll, K.P.: Contrasting submarine specialty training: sonar and fire control. Dev. Prof. Exp. 271 (2009)
Roberts, A.P.J., Stanton, N.A., Fay, D., Pope, K.A.: The effects of team co-location and reduced crewing on team communication characteristics. Appl. Ergon. 81, 102875 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102875
Mack, S.: Perisher: Submarine command training in the Royal Navy. Undersea Warfare (2003)
Hamburger, P., Miskimens, D., Truver, S.: It is not just hardware and software, anymore! human systems integration in US submarines. Nav. Eng. J. 123, 41–50 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2009.00198.x
Stanton, N.A., Roberts, A.P.J.: Better together? investigating new control room configurations and reduced crew size in submarine command and control. Ergonomics 63, 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1654137
Stanton, N.A., Roberts, A.P.J.: Block off: an examination of new control room configurations and reduced crew sizes examining engineered production blocking. Cogn. Technol. Work 22(1), 29–55 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00542-x
Roberts, A.P.J., Stanton, N.A., Fay, D.: The command team experimental test-bed stage 1: design and build of a submarine command room simulator. Procedia Manuf. 3, 2800–2807 (2015)
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the Underwater Systems Programme of the UK Ministry of Defence Science and Technology Programme. Any views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Ministry of Defence or any other UK government department. The authors would like to thank Joy Richardson from the University of Southampton for their help with the collection of data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pope, K.A., Roberts, A.P.J., Fay, D., Stanton, N.A. (2020). Assessing Situation Awareness Across Different Submarine Control Room Layouts. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50942-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50943-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)