Skip to main content

Psychosocial Risk Assessment by Fine Kinney and ANFIS Method: A Case Study in a Metal Processing Plant

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1204))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Occupational health and safety practices continue to improve, but accidents and occupational health issues continue to cause problems for management and employees. Although psychosocial risks and hazards have substantial adverse effects, they are often overlooked in most risk assessment practices. The objective of this work is to assess the employee psychosocial risks by a case study using the COPSOQII questionnaire at a metal processing plant. Inputs from COPSOQII questionnaire were used to assess psychosocial hazards in Fine Kinney analysis. The Fine-Kinney method contains fuzzy decisions. This uncertainty is resolved by using the ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System) module. Results of the ANFIS model indicate that when actual risks and those predicted by the model are compared, the model could predict the risk scores with high accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pejtersen, J.H., Kristensen, T.S., Borg, V., Bjorner, J.B.: The second version of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Scand. J. Public Health 38, 8ā€“24 (2010)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Kristensen, T.S., Hannerz, H., Hogh, A., Borg, V.: The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)- a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 31, 438ā€“449 (2005)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Nordlƶf, H., Wiitavaraa, B., Winblad, U., Wijk, K., Westerling, R.: Safety culture and reasons for risk-taking at a large steel-manufacturing company: investigating the worker perspective. Saf. Sci. 73, 126ā€“135 (2015)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Agostini, M., Bauchiere, D., Beaufort, P., Montreuil, E., Van Criekingen, L., Weingarten, J.: Industrial relations practices related to psychosocial constraints at work in the steel sector. Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR (2014)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Sheikhalishahi, M., Pintelon, L., Azadeh, A.: Human factors in maintenance: a review. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 22, 218ā€“237 (2016)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Dicke, T., Marsh, H.W., Parker, P.D., Guo, J., Horwood, M.: Validating the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ-II) using Set-ESEM: identifying psychosocial risk factors in a sample of school principals. Quant. Psychol. Measur. Sect. J. Front. Psychol. 9, 584 (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Ramkissoon, A., Smith, P., Oudyk, J.: Dissecting the effect of workplace exposures on workersā€™ rating of psychological health and safety. Am. J. Ind. Med. 62, 412ā€“421 (2019)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Fine, W.T.: Mathematical evaluation for controlling hazards. J. Saf. Res. Defin. 3, 157ā€“166 (1971)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Kinney, G.F., Wiruth, A.D.: Practical Risk Analysis for Safety Management, vol. 5865. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake (1976)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Jang, J.S.R.: ANFIS: adaptive-network based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23, 665ā€“685 (1993)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nalan BaƧ .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

BaƧ, N., Ekmekci, I. (2020). Psychosocial Risk Assessment by Fine Kinney and ANFIS Method: A Case Study in a Metal Processing Plant. In: Arezes, P., Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1204. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50946-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50946-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50945-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50946-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics