Skip to main content

Safety Decision-Making in Academia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1204))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 846 Accesses

Abstract

This paper illustrates the challenges of safety management in Academia, which are difficult to overcome using conventional methods of risk management. The positive aspects and disadvantages of the risk management tools specifically designed for the laboratory collection are addressed. We propose a different approach to hazard detection that can ease the burden for Academia safety experts of tedious time-consuming risk assessment. Based on the observations of Academia’s safety management, we are attempting to build a semi-quantitative risk analysis model that will conform to the concept of safety-II. This paper suggests an approach that allows to integrate this model into human oriented performance driven decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hollnagel, E.: Safety-I and safety-II. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Centemeri, L.: The Seveso disaster legacy. In: Nature and History in Modern Italy, pp. 251–273. Ohio University Press & Swallow Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. IAEA. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/13/677/13677904.pdf

  4. Khan, A.H., Hasan, S., Sarkar, M.A.R.: Analysis of possible causes of Fukushima disaster. Int. J. Nucl. Quantum Eng. 12(2), 53–58 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eurocontrol. https://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2437.pdf

  6. https://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i18/Importance-Teaching-Safety.html. Accessed 08 Dec 2019

  7. Bilir, S., Gürcanli, G.: A method for determination of accident probability in construction industry. Teknik Dergi 29(4), 8537–8561 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Zero_accident_vision. Accessed 08 Dec 2019

  9. https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hospitals/mgmt_tools_resources.html. Accessed 08 Dec 2019

  10. Ludwig, J., Bastin, G., Chewings, V., Eager, R., Liedloff, A.: Leakiness: a new index for monitoring the health of arid and semiarid landscapes using remotely sensed vegetation cover and elevation data. Ecol. Ind. 7, 442–454 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/why-sms.pdf (Retrieved: 08/12/2019)

  12. https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/sms. Accessed 08 Dec 2019

  13. http://www.hse.gov.uk/Research. Accessed 08 Dec 2019

  14. https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3844.pdf. Accessed 08 Dec 2019

  15. https://www.ccohs.ca/topics/hazards. Accessed 08 Dec 2019

  16. Viner, D.: Accident analysis and risk control. VHMS, Fairfield (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. The core body of knowledge for generalist OHS professionals. Safety Institute of Australia, Tullamarine (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Macdonald, W.: A hierarchy of risk control measures for prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. In: International Ergonomics Conference on Humanising Work and the Work Environment, Guwahati, India (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marendaz, J., Suard, J., Meyer, T.: A systematic tool for assessment and classification of hazards in laboratories (ACHiL). Saf. Sci. 53, 168–176 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Valis, D., Koucky, M.: Selected overview of risk assessment techniques. Problemy ekspoatacji, 19–23 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hashemi-Tilehnoee, M., Pazirandeh, A., Tashakor, S.: HAZOP-study on heavy water research reactor primary cooling system. Ann. Nucl. Energy 37, 428–433 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozenfeld, O., Sacks, R., Rosenfeld, Y., Baum, H.: Construction job safety analysis. Saf. Sci. 48, 491–498 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ericson, C.: Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guimarães, A., Lapa, C.: Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 7, 17–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Díaz, R., Fernánde, G., Muzzio, C.: Practical application of quality risk management to the filling process of betamethasone injections. Pharm. Eng. 31, 84–89 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dai, W., Maropoulos, P., Cheung, W., Tang, X.: Decision-making in product quality based on failure knowledge. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 5, 143 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Park, A., Lee, S.: Fault tree analysis on handwashing for hygiene management. Food Control 20, 223–229 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. You, X., Tonon, F.: Event-tree analysis with imprecise probabilities. Risk Anal. 32, 330–344 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Givehchi, S., Heidari, A.: Bayes networks and fault tree analysis application in reliability estimation (case study: automatic water sprinkler system). Environ. Energy Econ. Res. 2(4), 325–341 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leggett, D.: Lab-HIRA: hazard identification and risk analysis for the chemical research laboratory: part 1. Preliminary hazard evaluation. J. Chem. Health Saf. 19, 9–24 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ouédraogo, A., Groso, A., Meyer, T.: Risk analysis in research environment – part I: modeling lab criticity index using improved risk priority number. Saf. Sci. 49, 778–784 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kletz, T.A.: Looking beyond ALARP: overcoming its limitations. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 83, 81–84 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kron, H.H.: On the evaluation of risk acceptance principles. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.455.4506&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  34. Wigger, P.: Experience with safety integrity level (SIL) allocation in railway applications (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gosman, S.: Justifying safety: the paradox of rationality. 90 Temp. L. Rev. 155 (2018). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2956022

  36. Leimeister, M., Kolios, A.: A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91, 1065–1076 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Herrmann, J.: Engineering Decision Making and Risk Management. Wiley, New York (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Eggemeier, F.: Properties of workload assessment techniques. Adv. Psychol. 52, 41–62 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thierry Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kalugina, A., Meyer, T. (2020). Safety Decision-Making in Academia. In: Arezes, P., Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Safety Management and Human Performance. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1204. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50946-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50946-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50945-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50946-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics