Skip to main content

Fidget Spinners May Decrease Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Cognitively Challenging Fine Motor Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2020)

Abstract

Despite increasing popularity, media attention, and commercial success of fidget spinners, scientific evidence on their effectiveness is scarce. The purpose of this study was to explore how fidget spinners affect fine motor performance and its neural correlates in the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC). Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to examine the PFC activity while a group of healthy adult participants completed five different sub-tasks of the Purdue Pegboard Task (PPT). In this study, fidget spinners resulted in a significant decrease in ΔHbO compared to the controls during performance of the more cognitively demanding assembly subtask despite no differences in behavioral output. No other main effects for group existed in the other sub-tasks, although significant group by block interactions occurred in all four brain regions. This finding suggests that fidget spinners may reduce the cognitive load on LDLPFC during a cognitively challenging fine motor task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mehrabian, A., Friedman, S.L.: An analysis of fidgeting and associated individual differences. J. Pers. 54(2), 406–429 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. G.: The measure of fidget. Nature 32(817), 174–175 (1885)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gawrilow, C., Kühnhausen, J., Schmid, J., Stadler, G.: Hyperactivity and motoric activity in ADHD: Characterization, assessment, and intervention. Front. Psychiatry, 5, 171 (2014). Frontiers Research Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seli, P., Carriere, J.S.A., Thomson, D.R., Cheyne, J.A., Martens, K.A.E., Smilek, D.: Restless mind, restless body. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40(3), 660–668 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carriere, J.S.A., Seli, P., Smilek, D.: Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67(1), 19–31 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farley, J., Risko, E.F., Kingstone, A.: Everyday attention and lecture retention: the effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Front. Psychol. 4, 619 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gligorić, N., Uzelac, A., Krco, S.: Smart classroom: real-time feedback on lecture quality. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, PERCOM Workshops 2012, pp. 391–394 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pine, K.J., Bird, H., Kirk, E.: The effects of prohibiting gestures on children’s lexical retrieval ability. Dev. Sci. 10(6), 747–754 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarver, D.E., Rapport, M.D., Kofler, M.J., Raiker, J.S., Friedman, L.M.: Hyperactivity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): impairing deficit or compensatory behavior? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 43(7), 1219–1232 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartanto, T.A., Krafft, C.E., Iosif, A.M., Schweitzer, J.B.: A trial-by-trial analysis reveals more intense physical activity is associated with better cognitive control performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child Neuropsychol. 22(5), 618–626 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rapport, M.D., Bolden, J., Kofler, M.J., Sarver, D.E., Raiker, J.S., Alderson, R.M.: Hyperactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a ubiquitous core symptom or manifestation of working memory deficits? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 37(4), 521–534 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Musall, S., Kaufman, M.T., Juavinett, A.L., Gluf, S., Churchland, A.K.: Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements. Nat. Neurosci. 22(10), 1677–1686 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daily chart - The fidget-spinner boom | Graphic detail | The Economist. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/09/08/the-fidget-spinner-boom. Accessed 13 Feb 2020

  14. Impeachment trial: Senators use fidget spinners and stress balls to relieve boredom during Trump impeachment proceedings - CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-impeachment-trial-senators-fidget-spinners-relieve-boredom/. Accessed 12 Feb 2020

  15. Schecter, R.A., Shah, J., Fruitman, K., Milanaik, R.L.: Fidget spinners: purported benefits, adverse effects and accepted alternatives. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 29(5), 616–618 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graziano, P.A., Garcia, A.M., Landis, T.D.: To fidget or not to fidget, that is the question: a systematic classroom evaluation of fidget spinners among young children with ADHD. J. Atten. Disord. 24(1), 163–171 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Amico, G., Schaefer, S.: No evidence for performance improvements in episodic memory due to fidgeting, doodling or a ‘neuro-enhancing’ drink. J. Cogn. Enhanc. 4(1), 2–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Soares, J.S., Storm, B.C.: Putting a negative spin on it: Using a fidget spinner can impair memory for a video lecture. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 34(1), 277–284 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen, E.J., Bravi, R., Minciacchi, D.: The effect of fidget spinners on fine motor control. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 2–11 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahbub, M., et al.: A systematic review of diagnostic performance of quantitative tests to assess musculoskeletal disorders in hand-arm vibration syndrome. Ind. Health 53(5), 391–397 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A., Elwell, C.E.: Illuminating the developing brain: the past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(3), 269–284 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakhshipour, E., Koiler, R., Milla, K., Getchell, N.: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms of a Manual Dexterity Assessment using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 41, S26 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Milla, K., Bakhshipour, E., Bodt, B., Getchell, N.: Does movement matter? Prefrontal cortex activity during 2D vs. 3D performance of the tower of Hanoi puzzle. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 156 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ceja, K., Bakhshipour, E., Khoeilar, R., Getchell, N.: Does oxygenation of prefrontal cortex change in a two versus three-dimensional Tower of Hanoi task? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koiler, R., Bakhshipour, E., Milla, K., Plumb, M., Getchell, N.: Understanding handwriting pauses in the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting test using fNIRs. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 41, S38 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P.A., Curtin, A., Izzetoglu, M., Izzetoglu, K., Onaral, B.: Using MazeSuite and functional near infrared spectroscopy to study learning in spatial navigation. J. Vis. Exp. 56, 3443 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shewokis, P.A., Shariff, F.U., Liu, Y., Ayaz, H., Castellanos, A., Lind, D.S.: Acquisition, retention and transfer of simulated laparoscopic tasks using fNIR and a contextual interference paradigm. Am. J. Surg. 213(2), 336–345 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. NCSS 2019 Statistical Software. NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kaller, C.P., Rahm, B., Spreer, J., Weiller, C., Unterrainer, J.M.: Dissociable contributions of left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in planning. Cereb. Cortex 21(2), 307–317 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Koiler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Koiler, R. et al. (2021). Fidget Spinners May Decrease Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Cognitively Challenging Fine Motor Tasks. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51041-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics