Skip to main content

Building Shelter in Washington: The Politics of Small State Engagement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Small States and the New Security Environment

Part of the book series: The World of Small States ((WSS,volume 7))

  • 842 Accesses

Abstract

Small states seeking shelter with the United States face the daunting challenge of ensuring that both their economic and security relationships are durable. Building shelter requires establishing a standing functional relationship with both the executive and legislative branches of the US government and creating a platform for the advocacy of critical interests. On the basis of three different case studies—those of Norway, Israel and New Zealand—presumptions are made on how small states do this in practice. States that face a change in the shelter environment in Washington may well wish to re-evaluate their shelter strategy with Washington.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FrĂĽhling (2016), p. 13.

  2. 2.

    D. Samuels, “The Aspiring Novelist Who Became Obama’s Foreign-Policy Guru,” New York Times, 5 May 2016.

  3. 3.

    Center for Responsive Politics, Lobbying Database,https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/. Accessed 30 June 2018.

  4. 4.

    T. LaPira, “How Much Lobbying Is There in Washington? It’s DOUBLE What You Think,” Sunlight Foundation,http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2013/11/25/how-muchlobbying-is-there-in-washington-its-double-what-you-think/. 2013.

  5. 5.

    Newhouse (2009), pp. 73–92.

  6. 6.

    Nownes (2006).

  7. 7.

    Baumgartner (2009).

  8. 8.

    D. Rehr, “Congressional Communications Report,” Washington, DC, 2018, http://www.congressionalcommunicationsreport.com/.

  9. 9.

    US Department of Justice, FARA Database,https://www.fara.gov/docs/5611-Exhibit-AB-20060522-3.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2006.

  10. 10.

    US Department of Justice, FARA Database,https://efile.fara.gov/pls/apex/f?p=181:200:12190325063119::NO:RP,200:P200_REG_NUMBER:5867. Accessed 17 January 2019.

  11. 11.

    E. Lipton, B. Williams and N. Confessore, “Foreign Powers Buy Influence at Think Tanks,” New York Times, September 7, 2014.

  12. 12.

    Center for Strategic and International Studies. Government Donors [WWW Document],], https://www.csis.org/support-csis/our-donors/government-donors, 2019. Accessed 7 January.

  13. 13.

    Cavari and Nyer (2016).

  14. 14.

    Marshall (2015), pp. 8–10.

  15. 15.

    Rabin (1996), p. 124.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Zvi Rafiah oral history, Stephen F. Austin State University, 2012. http://www.sfasu.edu/heritagecenter/5381.asp.

  18. 18.

    Arens (2018).

  19. 19.

    Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995, Washington, D.C: (U.S. Government Printing Office), 1995.

  20. 20.

    J. De Pinto, “Americans split on Trump’s handling of relations with Israel--CBS News poll,” CBS News,https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-americans-split-on-trumps-handling-of-relations-with-israel-cbs-news-poll/. 2018.

  21. 21.

    American Jewish Committee, “AJC 2018 Survey of American Jewish Opinion,” https://www.ajc.org/news/survey2018. Accessed 23 January 2019.

  22. 22.

    P. Bump, “Half of evangelicals support Israel because they believe it is important for fulfilling end-times prophecy,” The Washington Post, 14 May 2018.

  23. 23.

    Wood (2010).

  24. 24.

    C. Espiner, “Getting 54 members of the United States House of Representatives to join a… .” New Zealand Herald, 18 February 2005.

  25. 25.

    Elms (2016), pp. 1017–1039.

  26. 26.

    C. Espiner, “PM’s Remarks Not Forgotten,” The Christchurch Press, 13 January 2004.

  27. 27.

    Elms (2016), pp. 1017–1039.

  28. 28.

    U. S. Department of Justice, Foreign Agents Registration Act database, efile.fara.gov. Accessed 29 February 2020.

  29. 29.

    W. Peters, “Pacific Partnerships,” Georgetown Address in partnership with the Center for Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Studies - Georgetown University and the NZ Embassy, http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1812/S00195/speech-peters-pacific-partnerships-georgetown.htm. 2018.

  30. 30.

    W. Peters, “Pacific Partnerships.” Georgetown Address in partnership with the Center for Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Studies - Georgetown University and the NZ Embassy,http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1812/S00195/speech-peters-pacific-partnerships-georgetown.htm. 2018.

References

  • Arens M (2018) In defense of Israel: a memoir of a political life. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner F (2009) Lobbying and policy change: who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavari A, Nyer E (2016) Trends in US congressional support for Israel. The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, Ramat Gan

    Google Scholar 

  • Elms D (2016) The origins and evolution of the trans-pacific partnership trade negotiations. Asian Surv 56(6):1017–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FrĂĽhling S (2016) Wrestling with commitment: geography, alliance institutions and the ANZUS treaty. In: Australia’s American Alliance. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall R (2015) Netanyahu’s speech to congress causes tremors in the “unshakable” alliance. Wash Rep Middle East Aff 34(3):8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse J (2009) Diplomacy, Inc. Foreign Aff 88(3):73–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Nownes A (2006) Total lobbying: what lobbyists want (and how they try to get it). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin Y (1996) The Rabin memoirs. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 124

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood J (2010) Negotiating within Washington: thrown in at the deep end—a New Zealand diplomat looks back. In: American negotiating behavior: wheeler-dealers, legal eagles, bullies, and preachers. U.S. Institute of Peace Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan C. Tidwell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tidwell, A.C. (2021). Building Shelter in Washington: The Politics of Small State Engagement. In: Brady, AM., Thorhallsson, B. (eds) Small States and the New Security Environment. The World of Small States, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51528-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51529-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics