Abstract
In 2007, ethnic divisions and conflicting interpretations of Estonia’s World War II legacy were exposed in the Bronze Soldier war memorial incident. The Estonian government relocated the controversial statue and war graves, which resulted in riots and massive cyberattacks by Russia. It was a sure sign that the security environment had changed for Estonia and its Baltic neighbours. Protracted deterioration of the relations between Russia and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) after the annexation of Crimea has turned Baltic states into NATO’s “new front-line states” and exposed them to recurrent Russian interference activities, which, however, fall under NATO’s Article 5 threshold. Due to the dominant traditional security concept in all three states, the nature of Russian interference activities and the particularities of an external shelter mean that societal security remains the main security challenge in the Baltic states. This chapter investigates the main societal security challenges in three Baltic states to identify the ways Russia attempts to manipulate them and to discover the strategies and tools that Baltic states employ to respond to these challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Thorhallsson (2015).
- 2.
Riigikantselei, National Security Concept of Estonia, 2017, https://riigikantselei.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/Failid/national_security_concept_2017.pdf; KAM (2017); National Security Strategy of Republic of Lithuania, https://kam.lt/en/title.html; MOD (2015); The National Security Concept of Latvia, Informative section. https://www.mod.gov.lv/~/media/AM/Par_aizsardzibas_nozari/Plani,%20koncepcijas/NDK/NDK_ENG_final.ashx.
- 3.
Gotkowsaka and Szymański (2017), p. 5, http://www.centrumbalticum.org/files/2157/BSR_Policy_Briefing_1_2017.pdf.
- 4.
- 5.
Buzan and Waver (1998).
- 6.
State Security Department of Republic of Lithuania (VSD) and Second Investigation Department Under the Ministry of National Defence (AOTD), National Threat Assessment of Lithuania, 2018, https://www.vsd.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ENG.pdf, p. 58.
- 7.
A. Raczh, “Russia’s Hybrid War in Ukraine: Breaking the Enemy’s Ability to Resist,” Finnish Institute of International Affairs, FIIA Report 43, 2015, https://storage.googleapis.com/upi-live/2017/01/fiiareport43.pdf.
- 8.
D. Johnson, “Russia’s Approach to Conflict –Implications for NATO’s Deterrence and Defence,” NATO Defence College. Research Paper 111, 2015, p. 16.
- 9.
Chivvis (2017), pp. 3–4, https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/CT400/CT468/RAND_CT468.pdf.
- 10.
Vitkus (2017), p. 149.
- 11.
- 12.
Sprūds and Vizgunova (2018), p. 10.
- 13.
Buzan et al. (1998).
- 14.
Thorhallsson (2018), p. 27, https://www.um.edu.mt/sst/docs/SST-1-1-Thorhallsson.pdf.
- 15.
European Commission, Eurydice, Latvia, 2018, https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/population-demographic-situation-languages-and-religions-40_en.
- 16.
Kuczynska-Zonik (2017), https://doi.org/10.11649/en.1438.
- 17.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, “At home Latvian is spoken by 62% of Latvian population; the majority – in Vidzeme and Lubāna county,” 2013, https://www.csb.gov.lv/en/statistics/statistics-by-theme/population/census/search-in-theme/1442-home-latvian-spoken-62-latvian-population.
- 18.
M. Laruelle, “The “Russian World: Russia’s Soft Power and Geopolitical Imagination,” Centre on Global Interests (CGI), pp. 8–10, http://globalinterests.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/FINAL-CGI_Russian-World_Marlene-Laruelle.pdf.
- 19.
- 20.
European Commission, Standard Eurobarometer 86: Public Opinion in the European Union, December 2016, 22, http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/yearFrom/1974/yearTo/2016/surveyKy/2137.
- 21.
Latvia Security Police, Annual Report, 2016, 12–18, 19–22, https://vdd.gov.lv/en/useful/annual-reports/.
- 22.
Berzina, 3.
- 23.
Latvia Security Police, Annual Report, 2018, 23, https://vdd.gov.lv/en/useful/annual-reports/.
- 24.
Kudors (2014), p. 74.
- 25.
Latvia Security Police, Annual Report, 2018, 18.
- 26.
Berzina, 3.
- 27.
Potjomkina and Vizgunova (2018), p. 126.
- 28.
A. Wiktorek Saro, “Fighting Disinformation in Baltic States,” FIPRI, 2017, https://www.fpri.org/article/2017/07/fighting-disinformation-baltic-states/.
- 29.
Vilmorus, “Apklausa: draugiškiausia valsybė- Latvija, didžiausią grėsmę kelia Rusija. Lzinios.lt, 2019, https://www.lzinios.lt/Lietuva/apklausa-draugiskiausia-valstybe-latvija-didziausia-gresme-kelia-rusija/280952.
- 30.
Lietuvos statistikos departamentas, Lietuvos gyventojai 2011 metais. 2011 m. gyventojų surašymo duomenys, 2013, https://news.err.ee/852030/the-grey-passport-issue-ministry-of-the-interior-s-response.
- 31.
KAM, National Security Strategy of Republic of Lithuania, 2017, 6–7, https://kam.lt/en/title.html.
- 32.
Matonytė et al. (2017), p. 17.
- 33.
State Security Department of Republic of Lithuania (VSD) and Second Investigation Department Under the Ministry of National Defence (AOTD), National Threat Assessment of Lithuania, 2019, 44, https://www.vsd.lt/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019-Gresmes-internetui-EN.pdf.
- 34.
Bajarūnas and Keršanskas (2018), p. 144, https://www.tspmi.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/lietuvos-metine-strategine-apzvalga-2017-2018-t-16.pdf.
- 35.
State Security Department of Republic of Lithuania (VSD) and Second Investigation Department Under the Ministry of National Defence (AOTD), National Threat Assessment of Lithuania, 2019, 46, https://www.vsd.lt/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019-Gresmes-internetui-EN.pdf.
- 36.
A. Ramonaitė, ed., “Kas eitų ginti Lietuvos: pilietinio pasipriešinimo prielaidos ir galimybės, Vilnius, 2018, pp. 155–157; Jastramskis (2017).
- 37.
National Threat Assessment of Lithuania, 2018, 43.
- 38.
“Lithuania looking for source of false accusation of rape by German troops, Reuters, 17 February, 2017, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lithuania-nato/lithuania-looking-for-source-of-false-accusation-of-rape-by-german-troops-idUSKBN15W1JO.
- 39.
Nacionalinis kibernetinio saugumo centras prie Krašto apsaugos ministerijos, 2017 metų nacionalio kibernetinio saugumo būklės ataskaita, https://www.nksc.lt/doc/NKSC_ataskaita_2017_%5blt%5d.pdf.
- 40.
Kremlin Watch Report, “Ranking of countermeasures by the EU28 to the Kremlin’s subversion operations,” European Values, 2018, 65. http://www.kremlinwatch.eu/userfiles/2018-ranking-of-countermeasures-by-the-eu28-to-the-kremlin-s-subversion-operations.pdf.
- 41.
Verslo žinios, Išankstiniame Jungtinių Tautų (JT) skelbiamame globaliame kibernetinio saugumo indekse Lietuva užima ketvirtą vietą, pirmadienį pranešė Krašto apsaugos ministerija, Verslo Žinios, 2019, https://www.vz.lt/verslo-aplinka/2019/04/01/pasauliniame-kibernetinio-saugumo-indekse-lietuva-uzeme-ketvirta-vieta#ixzz5nQwOaYOv.
- 42.
Riigikantselei, “National Security Concept of Estonia,” 2017, 6, 21, https://riigikantselei.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/Failid/national_security_concept_2017.pdf.
- 43.
European Parliament, “Democratic Transition and Linguistic Minorities in Estonia and Latvia,” In-depth Analysis, 2018, 8, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2018/604952/IPOL_IDA(2018)6049.52_EN.pdf; World Population Review, Estonia, 2019, http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/estonia-population/.
- 44.
Lucas and Pomeranzev (2016), p. 21, https://cepa.ecms.pl/files/?id_plik=2773%2021.
- 45.
S. Svenson, “Russia and the Baltic States: Why Language Matters,” Inkstick, 2018, https://inkstickmedia.com/russia-baltic-states-language-matters/.
- 46.
- 47.
- 48.
Statistics Estonia, “Average monthly gross income per employee increased last year, News Release,” 2018, https://www.stat.ee/news-release-2018-052.
- 49.
Josh Rubin, “NATO Fears That This Town Will Be the Epicenter of Conflict With Russia,” The Atlantic, January 24, 2019, https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/01/narva-scenario-nato-conflict-russia-estonia/581089/.
- 50.
Lucas and Pomeranzev (2016), p. 21, https://cepa.ecms.pl/files/?id_plik=2773%2021.
- 51.
T. McCulloh, R. Johnson, “Hybrid Warfare,” Joint Special Operations University Report, No. 13–4, August 2013, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a591803.pdf.
- 52.
Riigikantselei, “National Security Concept of Estonia,” 2017, https://riigikantselei.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/Failid/national_security_concept_2017.pdf.
- 53.
Republic of Estonia Government, “The Government approved a comprehensive approach towards development civil protection,” 2018, https://www.valitsus.ee/en/news/government-approved-comprehensive-approach-towards-developing-civil-protection.
- 54.
Kuczynska-Zonik (2017), p. 53, https://doi.org/10.11649/sn.1438.
- 55.
G. Gray, “Fearing Russian Influence, Estonia Trust to the Arts, New York Times, November 1, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/11/arts/estonia-russia-narva.html.
- 56.
P. Goble, “Experts: Estonia has Successfully Integrated 90% of Its Ethnic Russians”, Estonian World, 2018, https://estonianworld.com/security/experts-estonia-successfully-integrated-nearly-90-ethnic-russians/?fbclid=IwAR0RhF_IuZIjTbK6dG4ESPViywPdleQ8YRIHDw2KLdrQTWUV8yOYoToTQXo.
References
Bajarūnas E, Keršanskas V (2018) Hibridinės grėsmės: turinio, keliamų iššūkių ir priemonių įveikti jas analizė. Lietuvos Metinė Strateginė Apžvalga 16:144, https://www.tspmi.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/lietuvos-metine-strategine-apzvalga-2017-2018-t-16.pdf
Berzina I (2018) Mitigating non-military vulnerabilities of Latvia, vol 1. American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C., https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Mitigating-Nonmilitary-Vulnerabilities-of-Latvia.pdf
Buzan B, Waver O (eds) (1998) Security: a new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder
Chivvis SC (2017) Understanding Russian “Hybrid Warfare” and what can be done about it. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, pp 3–4, Testimony, https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/testimonies/CT400/CT468/RAND_CT468.pdf
Gotkowsaka J, Szymański P (2017) Russia and security in the Baltic Sea region: some recommendations for policy-makers, Baltic Sea policy briefing series. Centrum Balticum, Turku, p 5, http://www.centrumbalticum.org/files/2157/BSR_Policy_Briefing_1_2017.pdf
Jakniūnaitė D (2016) Changes in security policy and perceptions of the Baltic States. J Baltic Secur 2(1):8
Jastramskis M (2017) Auditorijos reakcija: Rusijos propagandos poveikis Lietuvoje. In: Vaišnys A et al (eds) Rusijos propaganda: analizė, įvertinimas, rekomendacijos. Rytų Europos studijų centras, Vilnius
Kivirähk J (2018) Public opinion and national defence, analysis ordered by Estonian Ministry of Defence. Turu-uuringute, Tallinn, p 4, http://www.kaitseministeerium.ee/sites/default/files/elfinder/article_files/public_opinion_and_national_defence_2018_october.pdf
Kuczynska-Zonik A (2017) Non-citizens in Latvia: is it a real problem? Sprawy Narodowościowe. Seria nowa (49):53. https://doi.org/10.11649/sn.1438
Kudors A (2014) Russian soft power and non-military influence: the view from Latvia. In: Winnerstig M (ed) Tools of destabilization Russian “Soft Power” and non-military influence in the Baltic States. FOI, Stockholm, p 74
Lucas E (2015) The coming storm, Baltic Sea security report. Center for European Policy Analysis, Washington, D.C., https://1f3d3593-8810-425c-bc7f-8988c808b72b.filesusr.com/ugd/644196_302ae06eff3a4f20ab59888b0ed73a0f.pdf
Lucas E, Pomeranzev P (2016) Winning the information war: techniques and counter-strategies to Russian propaganda in Central and Eastern Europe. Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPTA), Washington D. C., p 21, https://cepa.ecms.pl/files/?id_plik=2773%2021
Matonytė I, Morkevičius V, Lašas A, Jankauskaite V (2017) Grėsmių visuomenės gerovei suvokimas: socialnio optimizmo, socialinio ir institucinio pasitikėjimo bei pasitikėjimo savimi įtaka. Politologija 85(1):17
Potjomkina D, Vizgunova E (2018) Societal security in Latvia: new wine in old bottles? In: Sprūds A, Vizgunova E (eds) Societal security in the Baltic Sea Region: expertise rapping and raising policy relevance. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Riga, p 126
Purju A (2013) Economic and social situation in the Baltic States: Estonia. European Economic and Social Committee, European Union, Brussels, https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/qe-30-12-149-en-c.pdf
Šešelgytė M (2013) A midget warrior: security choices of Lithuania. In: Rublovskis R, Šešelgyte M, Kaljurand R (eds) Defence and security for the small: perspective from the Baltic States. Centre for Small State Studies, Institute of International Affairs, Reykjavik, p 51
Sprūds A, Vizgunova E (eds) (2018) Societal security in the Baltic Sea Region: expertise rapping and raising policy relevance. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Riga, p 10
Thorhallsson B (2015) Do small states need shelter? The economic and political turmoil in Iceland. In: Baldersheim H, Keating M (eds) Small states in the modern world: vulnerabilities and opportunities. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Thorhallsson B (2018) Studying small states: a review. Small States Territories 1(1):27, https://www.um.edu.mt/sst/docs/SST-1-1-Thorhallsson.pdf
Vitkus G (2017) Societal security in Lithuania: what’s so different about it? In: Sprūds A, Vizgunova E (eds) Societal security in the Baltic Sea Region: expertise rapping and raising policy relevance. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Riga, p 149
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Šešelgytė, M., Bladaitė, N. (2021). How to Defend Society? Baltic Responses to Hybrid Threats. In: Brady, AM., Thorhallsson, B. (eds) Small States and the New Security Environment. The World of Small States, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51528-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51529-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)