Skip to main content

From Nordic Peacekeeper to NATO Peacemaker: Denmark’s Journey from Semi-neutral to Super Ally

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Small States and the New Security Environment

Part of the book series: The World of Small States ((WSS,volume 7))

Abstract

Danish foreign policy is characterized by a strong and diversified military engagement. From 1990 to 2018, Danish political decision-makers committed Danish troops to 76 military operations in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa compared to 13 operations during the Cold War from 1945 to 1989. In the essay, we argue that Denmark’s military activism since the end of the Cold War has combined shelter seeking with status seeking to the extent that the two now exist in symbiosis. Shelter seeking is conditioned upon status seeking, and status seeking is an instrument for shelter seeking. Thus, the essay offers lessons for small states in both practice and theory.

We would like to thank Clara Lyngholm Mortensen and Daniela Dominguez for research assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ringsmose and Rynning (2008), pp. 55–84.

  2. 2.

    Mouritzen (2007), pp. 155–167; Wivel and Crandall (2019), pp. 392–419.

  3. 3.

    Jakobsen and Rynning (2019), pp. 877–895.

  4. 4.

    Pedersen and Ringsmose (2017), pp. 339–357.

  5. 5.

    For recent overviews of this literature, see Baldacchino and Wivel (2020); Wivel et al. (2014), pp. 3–25.

  6. 6.

    Jesse and Dreyer (2016).

  7. 7.

    Wivel (2018), pp. 419–434.

  8. 8.

    Wivel et al. (2014), pp. 3–25.

  9. 9.

    Thorhallsson and Steinsson (2017).

  10. 10.

    Waltz (1979), p. 127.

  11. 11.

    Mariager and Wivel (2019) and Wivel and Crandall (2019).

  12. 12.

    Wivel et al. (2014), pp. 3–25.

  13. 13.

    Bailes et al. (2014), pp. 26–45; Edström et al. (2019).

  14. 14.

    Maass (2017).

  15. 15.

    Krause and Singer (2001), pp. 15–23; Morrow (1991), pp. 904–933.

  16. 16.

    Bailes et al. (2016), pp. 9–26; Thorhallsson (2019).

  17. 17.

    Larson et al. (2014), pp. 18–19.

  18. 18.

    Larson et al. (2014), p. 7.

  19. 19.

    de Carvalho and Neumann (2015), p. 1.

  20. 20.

    Ibid, 1–2.

  21. 21.

    For an analysis of the arguments of Danish policy-makers in relation to participation in the wars in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Kosovo, see Wivel (2019), pp. 363–539. For a recent official statement of the continued importance of the United States for Danish National Security, see the official Danish foreign and security policy strategy: Danish Government (2018).

  22. 22.

    E.g. Jakobsen et al. (2018), pp. 256–277.

  23. 23.

    Glenthøj (2018), pp. 566–598.

  24. 24.

    Rasmussen (2005), pp. 67–89.

  25. 25.

    Wivel and Crandall (2019), p. 399.

  26. 26.

    Petersen (2011), pp. 276–280.

  27. 27.

    Mortensen and Wivel (2019).

  28. 28.

    Jakobsen (2011), pp. 287–293; Jakobsen and Kjærsgaard (2017), p. 386.

  29. 29.

    Hækkerup (1965).

  30. 30.

    The other cornerstones were NATO (security and defense), EFTA/EC (trade and economic growth) and the Nordic Council of Ministers (identity politics).

  31. 31.

    Marcussen (2018), pp. 240–253.

  32. 32.

    SIPRI, SIPRI Military Expenditure Database: Data for all countries 1949–2017 (excel spreadsheet). https://www.7.org/databases/milex, accessed 16 January 2019.

  33. 33.

    With the notable exception of Greenland, which was used as a bargaining chip in Denmark’s relationship with the United States.

  34. 34.

    Due-Nielsen and Petersen (1995), pp. 11–54.

  35. 35.

    Jakobsen (2006), pp. 381–395.

  36. 36.

    Noreen (1983), pp. 43–56.

  37. 37.

    Mouritzen (2001), p. 298.

  38. 38.

    Wæver (1992), pp. 77–102.

  39. 39.

    Holm (2002), pp. 21, 22–23.

  40. 40.

    Wivel (2019), pp. 382–383.

  41. 41.

    Mariager and Wivel (2019), pp. 172–177.

  42. 42.

    Mortensen and Wivel (2019), p. 551.

  43. 43.

    Wivel (2019), pp. 454–459.

  44. 44.

    Rasmussen (2017), pp. 51–73.

  45. 45.

    Danish Ministry of Defence 2018, Aftale på forsvarsområdet 2018–2023, 28 January 2018. http://www.fmn.dk/temaer/forsvarsforlig/Documents/Forsvarsforlig-2018-2023.pdf, accessed 14 March 2019.

  46. 46.

    Jakobsen (2015), pp. 5–13.

  47. 47.

    Mariager and Wivel (2019), p. 22.

  48. 48.

    Cf. Breitenbauch (2015), p. 28.

  49. 49.

    The practical lessons discussed here draw on Mariager and Wivel (2019) and in Wivel et al. (2018).

  50. 50.

    Jakobsen et al. (2018).

  51. 51.

    Wivel (2019), pp. 330–333.

References

  • Bailes A, Rickli J-M, Thorhallsson B (2014) Small states, survival and strategy. In: Archer, Bailes, Wivel (eds) Small states and international security. Routledge, London, pp 26–45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bailes A, Thayer B, Thorhallsson B (2016) Alliance theory and alliance ‘shelter’: the complexities of small state alliance behavior. Third World Thematics: TWQ 1(1):9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldacchino G, Wivel A (2020) Introducing the politics of small states. In: Handbook on the politics of small states. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Breitenbauch H (2015) Uendelig krig?: Danmark, samtænkning og stabilisering af globale konflikter. Djøf Forlag, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Government (2018) Udenrigs- og sikkerhedspolitisk strategi 2019–2020. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • de Carvalho B, Neumann I (2015) Introduction: small states and status. In: de Carvalho B, Neumann I (eds) Small states and status seeking: Norway’s quest for international standing. Routledge, London, pp 1-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Due-Nielsen C, Petersen N (1995) Adaptation and activism. DJØF Forlag, København, pp 11–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Edström H, Gyllensporre D, Westberg J (2019) Military strategy of small states: responding to external shocks of the 21st century. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenthøj R (2018) 1864 før, nu og i fremtiden. Fortællinger i nyere og ældre dansk 1864-historiografi. Historisk Tidsskrift 117(2):566–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Hækkerup P (1965) Dansk Udenrigspolitik. Fremad, København

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm H-H (2002) Danish foreign policy activism: the rise and decline. In: Heurlin B, Mouritzen H (eds) Danish foreign policy yearbook 2002. Danish Institute of International Studies, Copenhagen, pp 21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen PV (2006) The Nordic peacekeeping model: rise, fall, resurgence? Int Peacekeeping 13(3):381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen P (2011) Fredsbevarende operationer. In: Den Kolde Krig Og Danmark. Gad, Copenhagen, pp 287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen P (2015) Danmarks militære aktivisme fortsætter med eller uden USA. Politik 18(4):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen P, Kjærsgaard K (2017) Den danske FN-aktivismes storhed og fald 1945–2016. Politica 49(4):386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen PV, Rynning S (2019) Denmark: happy to fight, will travel. Int Aff 95(4):877–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen P, Ringsmose J, Saxi H (2018) Prestige-seeking small states: Danish and Norwegian military contributions to US-led operations. Eur J Int Secur 3(2):256–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesse N, Dreyer J (2016) Small states in the international system: at peace and war. Lexington Books, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause V, Singer D (2001) Minor powers, alliances and armed conflict: some preliminary patterns. In: Reiter E, Gärtner H (eds) Small states and alliances. Physica-Verlag, Vienna, pp 15–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Larson D, Paul T, Wohlforth W (2014) Status and world order. In: Paul, T.V., Larson D, Wohlforth W (eds) Status in world politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass M (2017) Small states in world politics: the history of small state survival, 1648–2016. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen M (2018) Scandinavian models of diplomacy. In: Nedergaard P, Wivel A (eds) The Routledge handbook of Scandinavian politics. Routledge International Handbooks, Routledge, London; N.Y., pp 240–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariager R, Wivel A (2019) Hvorfor gik Danmark i krig? Uvildig udredning af baggrunden for Danmarks militære engagement i Kosovo, Afghanistan og Irak. Rosendahls, København

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow J (1991) Alliances and asymmetry: an alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science 35(4):904–933

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen C, Wivel A (2019) Mønstre og udviklingslinjer i Danmarks militære engagement 1945–2018. In: Mariager R, Wivel A (eds) Hvorfor gik Danmark i krig? Uvildig udredning af baggrunden for Danmarks militære engagement i Kosovo, Afghanistan og Irak. Rosendahls, København, pp 541-638

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouritzen H (2001) Security communities in the Baltic Sea region: real and imagined. Secur Dialogue 32(3):297-310

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouritzen H (2007) Denmark’s super Atlanticism. Journal of Transatlantic Studies 5(2):155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreen E (1983) The Nordic balance: a security policy concept in theory and practice. Cooperation and Conflict 18(1):43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen RB, Ringsmose J (2017) Aktivisme i dansk udenrigspolitik: Norden, FN, NATO og EU. Politica 49(4):339–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen N (2011) Forsvarspolitik. In: Lauridsen JT, Mariager R, Olesen TB, Villaume P (eds) Den Kolde Krig og Danmark. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen, pp 276–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen MV (2005) ‘What’s the use of it?’: Danish strategic culture and the utility of armed force. Cooperation and Conflict 40(1):67–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen M (2017) Nationalists, national liberals and cosmopolitans: Danish foreign policy debates after Brexit and Trump. In: Fischer K, Mouritzen H (eds) Danish foreign policy yearbook, pp 51–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringsmose J, Rynning S (2008) The impeccable ally? Denmark, NATO, and the uncertain future of top tier membership. In: Hvidt N, Mouritzen H (eds) Danish foreign policy yearbook. Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, pp 55–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B (ed) (2019) Small states and shelter theory: Iceland’s external affairs. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorhallsson B, Steinsson S (2017) Small state foreign policy. In: Oxford research encyclopaedia of politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver O (1992) Nordic Nostalgia: Northern Europe after the Cold War. International Affairs 68(1):77–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz K (1979) Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wivel A (2018) Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder? Mapping Nordicness in Danish foreign policy. Global Affairs 4(4–5):419–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Wivel A (2019) Hvorfor bidrog Danmark militært i Kosovo, Afghanistan og Irak? En analyse af de offentligt fremførte argumenter for Danmarks militære engagemen. In: Mariager R, Wivel A (eds) Hvorfor gik Danmarks i krig? Irak og tværgående analyser. Rosendals, Copenhagen, pp 363–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Wivel A, Crandall M (2019) Punching above their weight, but why? Explaining Denmark and Estonia in the transatlantic relationship. Journal of Transatlantic Studies 17(3):392–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Wivel A, Bailes A, Archer C (2014) Setting the scene: small states and international security. In: Archer C, Bailes A, Wivel A (eds) Small states and international security: Europe and beyond. Routledge, London, pp 3–25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wivel A, Mariager R, Mortensen C (2018) Denmark at war: patterns and developments in Denmark’s Military Engagement, Small States and the New Security (SSANSE), Policy Brief No. 8. http://ams.hi.is/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Denmark-at-War-Patterns-and-Developments-in-Denmark%C2%B4s-Military-Engagement-1.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Wivel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mariager, R., Wivel, A. (2021). From Nordic Peacekeeper to NATO Peacemaker: Denmark’s Journey from Semi-neutral to Super Ally. In: Brady, AM., Thorhallsson, B. (eds) Small States and the New Security Environment. The World of Small States, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51528-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51529-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics