Skip to main content

An Evaluation of Numerical Integration Methods for Estimating Cumulative Loading Based on Discrete Spinal Loads

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1215))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The focus of this contribution is to evaluate numerical integration methods with regard to their comparability for estimating cumulative loading based on discrete spinal loads. In this context, the influence of both weighting factors and sampling rate are investigated using a time-varying loading profile recorded in a laboratory study with 12 subjects. A biomechanical model was used to calculate the compression force at L5/S1. Three numerical integration methods were compared. Results clearly confirm the need to establish a standardized assessment procedure for cumulative loading to ensure the comparability of assessment results and promote scientific progress in the field of physical stress assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Maher, C., Underwood, M., Buchbinder, R.: Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 389(10070), 736–747 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Iridiastadi, H., Nussbaum, M.A.: Muscle fatigue and endurance during repetitive intermittent static efforts: development of prediction models. Ergonomics 49(4), 344–360 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garg, A., Kapellusch, J.M.: The cumulative lifting index (CULI) for the revised NIOSH lifting equation: quantifying risk for workers with job rotation. Hum. Factors 58(5), 683–694 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar, S.: Cumulative load as a risk factor for back pain. Spine 15(12), 1311–1316 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Norman, R., Wells, R., Neumann, P., Frank, J., Shannon, H., Kerr, M.: A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry. Clin. Biomech. 13(8), 561–573 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Waters, T., Yeung, S., Genaidy, A., Callaghan, J., Barriera-Viruet, H., Abdallah, S., Kumar, S.: Cumulative spinal loading exposure methods for manual material handling tasks. part 2: methodological issues and applicability for use in epidemiological studies. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 7(2), 131–148 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jäger, M., Jordan, C., Luttmann, A., Laurig, W., Dolly Group: Evaluation and assessment of lumbar load during total shifts for occupational manual materials handling jobs within the dortmund lumbar load study – DOLLY. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 25(6), 553–571 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gallagher, S., Schall, M.C.: Musculoskeletal disorders as a fatigue failure process: evidence, implications and research needs. Ergonomics, 60 (2), 255–269 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andrews, D.M., Callaghan, J.P.: Determining the minimum sampling rate needed to accurately quantify cumulative spine loading from digitized video. Appl. Ergon. 34(6), 589–595 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandl, C., Mertens, A., Schlick, C.M.: Effect of sampling interval on the reliability of ergonomic analysis using the Ovako working posture analysing system (OWAS). Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 57, 68–73 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jäger, M., Luttmann, A.: Biomechanical analysis and assessment of lumbar stress during load lifting using a dynamic 19-segment human model. Ergonomics 32(1), 93–112 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A. (eds.): Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th edn. Dover Publ, New York (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mair, P., Wilcox, R.: robust statistical methods in R using the WRS2 package. Behav. Res. Methods 52, 464–488 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Johnen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Johnen, L., Mertens, A., Nitsch, V., Brandl, C. (2020). An Evaluation of Numerical Integration Methods for Estimating Cumulative Loading Based on Discrete Spinal Loads. In: Karwowski, W., Goonetilleke, R., Xiong, S., Goossens, R., Murata, A. (eds) Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1215. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51549-2_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51549-2_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51548-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51549-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics