Skip to main content

Investigating the Differences in Privacy News Based on Grounded Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1215))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The current study explores how privacy is covered in the news in two different cultural contexts, by summarizing both an issue framework and a subject diagram utilizing privacy dialogues in the news coverages. Data was collected through Google and Baidu, most commonly used engines in the US and China through 2016 to 2019. Adopting a qualitative method based on the Grounded Theory, 400 news samples were coded following theoretical sampling procedure and reached a theoretical saturation. Our analyses yielded three main topics namely technology, data collection and use, and privacy law making and eight subtopics in the US and China that were framed differently in distrust aspect, and significantly different in reporting perspectives. We also found that subjects covered in privacy news were mainly related to legal topics. And a common ground was identified in the data protecting aspect for both users and data collectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mamonov, S., Benbunan-Fich, R.: An empirical investigation of privacy breach perceptions among smartphone application users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 49, 427 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission: Data protection report. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_431_en.pdf

  3. Krasnova, H., Veltri, N.F., Günther, O.: Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: the role of culture. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4(3), 127–135 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Markos, E., Milne, G.R., Peltier, J.W.: Information sensitivity and willingness to provide continua: a comparative privacy study of the United States and Brazil. J. Public Policy Mark. 36(1), 79–96 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McCombs, M.: Agenda setting function of mass media. Public Rel. Rev. 3(4), 89–95 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheufele, D.A., Tewksbury, D.: Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. J. Commun. 57(1), 9–20 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bellman, S., Johnson, E.J., Kobrin, S.J., Lohse, G.L.: International differences in information privacy concerns: a global survey of consumers. Inf. Soc. 20(5), 313–324 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nemati, H., Wall, J.D., Chow, A.: Privacy coping and information-sharing behaviors in social media: a comparison of Chinese and US users. J. Global Inf. Technol. Manag. 17(4), 228–249 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, B.: The international comparison and reference of privacy protection and the legislations on credit-investigation. J. Bus. Tech. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nam, T.: What determines the acceptance of government surveillance? Examining the influence of information privacy correlates. Soc. Sci. J. 56(4), 530 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, Y., Lau, T., Atkin, D.J., Lin, C.A.: A comparative study of online privacy regulations in the US and China. Telecommun. Policy 35(7), 603–616 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, T.: China and US students’ agreement on what’s sensitive data, contribute to the law and regulations adjustment. Int. J. Commun. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farrall, K.N.: Global privacy in flux: illuminating privacy across cultures in China and the US. Int. J. Commun. 2, 38 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jing, C.: Protecting the right to privacy in China. Victoria U. Wellington Rev. 36 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brandeis, L., Warren, S.: The right to privacy. Harvard Law Rev. 4(5), 193–220 (1890)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Acun, V., Yilmazer, S.: A grounded theory approach to investigate the perceived soundscape of open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 131, 28–37 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roman, D.J., Osinski, M., Erdmann, R.H.: The construction process of grounded theory in administration. Account. Administ. 62(3), 985–1000 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gharaei, F.M.N., Rafieian, M., Jalalkamali, N.: Investigating cross-cultural differences in the privacy regulation and perception of crowding: Northern and Yazdi women in Iran. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 50, 69–78 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masooda Bashir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zheng, Q., Bashir, M. (2020). Investigating the Differences in Privacy News Based on Grounded Theory. In: Karwowski, W., Goonetilleke, R., Xiong, S., Goossens, R., Murata, A. (eds) Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1215. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51549-2_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51549-2_70

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51548-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51549-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics