Skip to main content

Xenolith Petrology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Lithosphere Beneath the Indian Shield

Part of the book series: Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences ((MASE,volume 20))

  • 414 Accesses

Abstract

The xenoliths can be classified into two groups: (a) mantle xenoliths and (b) crustal xenoliths. On the basis of tectonic considerations, they belong to two geotectonic environments: (a) the circum-cratonic and (b) the cratonic. The former group is represented by xenoliths primarily in lamprophyre dykes and nephelinite plugs intrusive into the Deccan Traps along the margins and dislocation zones within the WDC, Bundelkhand, Aravalli, and Singhbhum cratons. The cratonic xenoliths are mainly hosted by kimberlites from the EDC, Bastar, and Bundelkhand cratons.

The circum-cratonic xenoliths can be classified into three broad petrographic groups, namely ultramafic, mafic, and felsic types. The ultramafic xenoliths are represented by spinel lherzolites, wehrlites, and rare harzburgites/dunites. The mineralogy of peridotite xenoliths is dominated by four phases, namely olivine, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, and aluminous spinel in order of abundance. The peridotites are protogranular/porphyroclastic to mosaic equigranular and invariably exhibit layering defined by idiomorphic grains of chromite. Most mafic and felsic xenoliths are granulites and display compositional layering on a scale of mm to cm.

The cratonic xenoliths in kimberlites from the Bundelkhand Craton are rare and contain macrocrysts of olivine pseudomorphs in a fine grain groundmass. The pyroxenite xenoliths from the lamprophyres exhibit cumulate textures and have significant volume percent of magnetite and titanomagnetite (up to 30 vol.%). The mafic xenoliths predominate and consist of plagioclase-poor, two pyroxene granulites with or without garnet along with eclogitic granulites. The peridotite xenoliths from the EDC are represented by garnet harzburgites, garnet lherzolites, garnet wehrlites, olivine clinopyroxenites, and eclogites. Those from the Bastar Craton consist mainly of garnet lherzolites along with felsic types. The lamproites from the Singhbhum Craton host rare harzburgite xenoliths along with xenocrystic olivine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akella J, Rao PS, McCallister RH, Boyd FR, Meyers HOA (1979) Mineralogic studies on the diamondiferous kimberlite of Wajrakarur area southern India. In: Boyd FR, Meyers HOA (eds) Kimberlite diatremes and diamonds: their mineralogy, petrology and geochemistry, Proc. 2nd Int. Kimbelite Conf., vol 1. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 172–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu EVSSK, Bhaskar Rao YJ, Mainkar D, Pastine JK, Srikant Rao R (2009) Mantle xenoliths from the Kodomali kimberlite pipe, Bastar craton, central India: evidence for decompression melting and crustal contamination in the mantle source. Geochim Cosmochim Acta Suppl 73(13):A66

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu AR, Tatsumoto M (1979) Samarium-neodymium systematics in kimberlites and in the minerals of garnet lherzolite inclusions. Science 205:398–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu AR, Paul RR, Dasgupta DK, Teichman F, Poreda RJ (1993) Early and late alkali igneous pulses and a high 3He plume origin for the Deccan flood basalts. Science 261:902–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu AR, Battacharya AK, Paul DK (1997) Petrology and geochemistry of lamprophyric rocks from Bokaro coal field, Bihar and their economic potential. J Geol Soc India 50:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd FR, Pokhilenko NP, Pearson DG, Mertzman SA, Sobolev NV, Fonger LW (1997) Composition of the Siberian cratonic mantle: evidence from Udachnaya peridotite xenoliths. Contrib Mineral Petrol 128:228–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalapathi Rao NV, Gibson SA, Pyle DM, Miller JA, Madhavan V (1999) Precise 40Ar/39Ar age determination of the Kotakonda and Chelima lamproite India: implications to the timing of mafic dyke swarm activity in the eastern Dharwar craton. J Geol Soc India 53:425–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalapathi Rao NV, Burgess R, Anand M, Mainkar D (2007) 40 Ar - 39Ar dating of the Kodomali Pipe, Bastar Craton, India: a Pan-African (491±11 Ma) age of diamondiferous kimberlite emplacement. J Geol Soc India 69:539–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalapathi Rao NV, Wu FY, Mitchell RH, Lehmann B (2013) Mesoproterozoic U-Pb ages, trace element and Sr-Nd isotopic composition of pervoskites from kimberlites of Eastern Dharwar craton, southern India: distinct mantle sources and a widespread 1.1 Ga tectonomagmatic event. Chem Geol 353:48–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalapathi Rao NV, Dongre AN, Wu FY, Lehmann B (2016) A late Cretaceous (ca. 90 ma) kimberlite event in southern India: implications for sub-continental lithospheric mantle evolution and diamond exploration. Gondwana Res 35:378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary SV, Rau TK, Rao KSB, Bhaskar Rao KS, Sridhar M, Sinha KK (2007) Timmasamudrum kimberlite cluster, Wajrakarur kimberlite field, Anantpur district Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 69:567–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman RG, Lee DE, Beatty LB, Brannock NW (1965) Eclogites and eclogites: their differences and similarities. Bull Geol Soc Am 76:483–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford AR, Compston W (1973) The age of the Cuddapah and Kurnool system, southern India. J Geol Soc Aust 19:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • De A (1980) Late Mesozoic lower tertiary magma types of Kutch and Saurashtra. Geol Soc Ind Mem 3:327–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai AG (1985) Ultramafic xenoliths(?) in lamprophyre dykes from Murud-Janjira, Raigarh district. Maharashtra Curr Sci 54:1235–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai AG, Vaselli O (1999) Petrology and geochemistry of xenoliths in lamprophyres from the Deccan Traps: implications for the nature of the deep crust boundary in western India. Min Mag 63:703–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai AG, Rock NMS, Griffin BJ, Gupta D (1990) Mineralogy and petrology of some xenolith bearing alkaline dykes associated with Deccan magmatism, south of Bombay, India. Eur Min 2:667–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai AG, Knight K, Vaselli O (1999) Thermal structure of the lithosphere beneath the Deccan Traps along the western continental margin: evidence from xenoliths data. J Geol Soc India 54:585–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai AG, Markwick A, Vaselli O, Downes H (2004) Granulite and Pyroxenite xenoliths from the Deccan trap: insight into the nature and composition of the lower lithosphere beneath cratonic India. Lithos 78:263–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai AG, Peinado M, Gokarn SG, Downes H (2009) Structure of the deep crust beneath the central Indian tectonic zone: an integration of geophysical and xenolith data. Gondwana Res 17:162–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer GL, Boettcher AL (1981) Petrologic and crystal-chemical significance of some deep-seated phlogopites. Am Mineral 66:1154–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnerty AA, Boyd FR (1984) Evaluation of thermobarometers for garnet peridotites. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey FA, Prinz M (1978) Ultramafic inclusions from Sao Carlos, Arizona: petrologic and geochemical data bearing on their petrogenesis, earth planet. Sci Lett 38:129–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly J, Battacharya PK (1987) Xenoliths in Proterozoic kimberlites from southern India: petrology and geophysical implications. In: Nixon PH (ed) Mantle xenoliths. Wiley, New York, pp 249–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Geological Survey of India (1993) Geological map of India, scale 1:500,000, Calcutta, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory LC, Meert JG, Pradhan V, Pandit MK, Tamrat E, Malone SJ (2006) A palaeomagnetic and geochronological study of the Majgawan kimberlite, India: implications for age of the Upper Vindhyan Supergroup. Precambrian Res 149:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin WL, Carlswell DA, Nixon PH (1979) Lower crustal granulites from Lesotho, South Africa. In: Boyd FR, Meyer HOA (eds) The mantle sample: inclusions in kimberlites and other volcanics, Proc. 2nd Int. Kimberlite Conf, vol 2. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 59–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin WL, O’Reilly SY (1987) The composition of lower crust and the nature of the continental Moho- xenoliths evidence. In: Nixon PH (ed) Mantle xenolith. Wiley, New York, pp 413–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin WL, Kobussen AF, Babu EVSSK, O’Reilly SY, Norris R, Sen Gupta P (2009) A translithospheric suture in the vanished 1-Ga lithospheric root of South India: evidence from contrasting lithosphere sections in the Dharwar craton. Lithos 112:1109–1119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann C, Feraud G, Courtillot V (2000) 39Ar/40Ar dating of mineral separates and whole rocks from Western Ghats lava pile: further constraints on duration and age of the Deccan Traps. Earth Planet Sci Lett 180:13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmalkar NR, Griffin WL, O’Reilly SY (2000) Ultramafic xenoliths from Kutch (NW India): plume related mantle samples? Int Geol Rev 42:416–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmalkar NR, Rege S, Griffin WL, O’Reilly SY (2005) Alkaline magmatism from Kutch, NW India: implications for plume-lithosphere interaction. Lithos 81:101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight KB, Baker JA, Basu AR, Dessai AG, Renne PR, Waight TCE (2000) A question of timing: chronological and isotopic evidence of the Deccan plume, India. Penrose Conference 2000 on volcanic rifted margins. Geological Society of America, and Royal Holloway, University of London, Abs. 43–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Kind R, Priestley K, Dahl-Jensen T (2007a) Crustal structure of Iceland and Greenland from receiver function studies. J Geophys Res 112:B03301

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Yuan S, Ravi Kumar M, Kind R, Li CX, Chadha K (2007b) The rapid drift of the Indian tectonic plate. Nature 449:894–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann B, Burgess R, Frei D, Belyatsky B, Mainkar D, Chalapathy Rao NV, Heaman IM (2010) Diamondiferous kimberlites in Central India synchronous with Deccan Flood Basalts. Earth Planet Sci Lett 290:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallikarjuna Rao J, Charan NS (1993) Petrography and geochemistry of pipe-7 kimberlite Anantpur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Geol Soc India 42:469–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier J-CC (1979) Peridotite xenoliths and the dynamics of kimberlite intrusion. In: Boyd FR, Meyer HOA (eds) The mantle samples: inclusions in kimberlites and other volcanics, Proc. 2nd Int. Kimberlite Conf., vol 2. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier J-CC, Nicolas A (1975) Texture and fabrics of upper mantle peridotites as illustrated by xenoliths from basalts. J Petrol 16:454–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto M, Fabries J, Fergusson AK, Ginzburg IV, Ross M, Seifert FA, Zussman J, Aoki K, Gottard G (1988) Nomenclature of pyroxenes. Min Mag 52:535–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee AB, Biswas S (1988) Mantle-derived spinel lherzolite xenoliths from the Deccan Volcanic Province (India): implications for the thermal structure of the lithosphere underlying the Deccan Traps. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 35:269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy DSN, Dayal AM, Natarajan, R (1994) Mineralogy and geochemistry of Chigicherla kimberlite and its xenoliths, Anantpur district, South India. Jour Geol Soc Ind 43:329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehru CE, Reddy AK (1989) Ultramafic xenoliths from Wajrakarur kimberlite, India, in: Ross J. (managing Ed.) et al., Kimberlites and Related Rocks. Sp Publ Geol Soc Aust 14:745–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel SC, Ravi S, Thakur SS, Rao TK, Subbarao KV (2006) Eclogite xenoliths from Wajrakarur kimberlite, southern India. Mineral Petrol 88:363–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel SC, Ravi S, Anilkumar Y, Naik A, Thakur SS, Pati JK, Nayak SS (2009) Mafic xenoliths in Proterozoic kimberlites from eastern Dharwar craton, India: mineralogy and P–T regime. J Asian Earth Sci 34:336–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul DK, Rex DC, Harris PG (1975) Chemical characteristics and K-Ar ages of Indian kimberlites. Bull Geol Soc Am 86:364–366. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<364:CCAKAO>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PS, Phadtre PN (1966) Kimberlite pipe rocks of Wajrakarur, Anantpur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Geol Soc Ind 7:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao KRP, Reddy TAK, Rao KVS, Rao NV (1998) Petrology and geochemistry of Narayanpet kimberlite in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. J Geol Soc India 52:663–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao KRP, Rao KN, Dhakate MV, Nayak SS (2001) Petrology and mineralogy of mantle xenoliths of Wajrakarur and Narayan pet kimberlite fields, Andhra Pradesh, India. Geol Surv Ind Publ 58:577–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi S, Patel SC, Reddy TAK, Rao TK (2007) Mafic xenoliths and chromian spinel macrocrysts in kimberlites from southern India. IAGR Mem 10:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy PR, Rao IBP (2003) Deep seismic studies in central Indian shield- a review. Geol Soc Ind Mem 53:79–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Smith BH (1989) Lamproites and kimberlites in India. Neues Jahrbuch Miner Abh 161:443–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilshire HG, Shervais JW (1975) Al-augite and Cr-diopside xenoliths in basaltic rocks from western United States. Phys Chem Earth 9:252–272

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dessai, A.G. (2021). Xenolith Petrology. In: The Lithosphere Beneath the Indian Shield. Modern Approaches in Solid Earth Sciences, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52942-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics