Skip to main content

From the Individual to the Public

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wiring the Streets, Surfing the Square

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 452 Accesses

Abstract

Digital technologies facilitate the formation of communities, which are distinct from the broader, more inclusive concept of the public. They are enmeshed in pronounced ways in the emergence of a “society of individuals” and a retreat from public space (and into virtual pseudo-spaces) that problematizes traditional notions of the constitution of publics and the pursuit of public life. These technologies are also implicated in the problematization of the supposed binary distinction between public and private spaces and practices. However, they also are being used in forging new modes of public interactions and relationships with different impacts on the public space of the city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    And, it could be argued, the radio and television.

  2. 2.

    The category of private space should not be confused with the privacy of the individual, which is a right that applies in any type of space, public or private. Privacy has many facets—the right to personal secrecy, commercial activity, the defensible space of the family or community among them.

  3. 3.

    Bateson has pointed out the pervasiveness of the habit of binary thinking, such that we seek to apply it even to things that are not binary in nature. The public/private distinction could be seen as one of these relations. This raises the question of whether there is a cogent Batesonian ternary relationship to replace the public/private distinction, establishing a relationship that is, to borrow another of Bateson’s distinctions, not symmetrical, with each vying for the same dominant position, but complementary, with each defining itself in relation to the others.

References

  • Arendt H (1998 [1958]). The human condition (2nd edn). University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee T (2001) The future of public space: beyond invented streets and reinvented places. J Am Plan Assoc 67(1):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney D (2003) Invasions of publicity. In: Law Commission of Canada. New perspectives on the public-private divide. UBC Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1935) Culture contact and schismogenesis. Man 35:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, New Delhi. Translated from Beck U (1986) Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin W (2002) The arcades project (trans: Eiland H, McLaughlin K). Belknap Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comp Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance: how the communications revolution will change our lives. Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua A (2018) Political tribes: group instinct and the fate of nations. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper G (2001) The mutable mobile: social theory in the wireless world. In: Brown B, Green N, Harper R (eds) Wireless world: social and interactional aspects of the mobile age. Springer, London, pp 19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper R (2018) Tribalism is not the problem. The Week. https://theweek.com/articles/802580/tribalism-not-problem. Accessed 13 Nov 2019

  • d’Entreves MP (2016) Hannah Arendt. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/arendt/. Accessed 17 Apr 2018

  • Dayan D, Katz E (1992) Media events: the live broadcasting of history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cauter L (2004) The capsular civilisation: on the city in the age of fear. NAi Publishers, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey F (1997) Cyburbanism as a way of life. In: Ellin N (ed) Architecture of fear. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton, pp 260–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25(26):56–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (2014) Turbulent and mighty continent: what future for Europe? Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger P (2003) Disconnected urbanism. Metropolis Magazine, p 66

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham S, Marvin S (1996) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1989 [1962]) The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton KN, Rainie L, Lu W, Dwyer M, Shin I, Purcell K (2014) Social media and the “spiral of silence”. Pew Research Center, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt M, Negri A (2004) Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (2008 [1927]) Being and time. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix S (2016) Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war, again. Guess who’s winning? The Washington Post online. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/traffic-weary-homeowners-and-waze-are-at-war-again-guess-whos-winning/2016/06/05/c466df46-299d-11e6-b989-4e5479715b54_story.html?utm_source=SFFB&utm_term=.de3b703b5d2e. Accessed 27 Apr 2018

  • Holmes D (ed) (1997) Virtual politics: identity and community in cyberspace. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosanagar K (2016) Blame the echo chamber on Facebook but blame yourself too. Wired Magazine online edition. https://www.wired.com/2016/11/facebook-echo-chamber. Accessed 25 Aug 2018

  • Innerarity D (2016) Governance in the new global disorder: politics for a post-sovereign society (trans: Kingery S). Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurgenson N, Rey PJ (2013) The fan dance: how privacy thrives in an age of hyper-publicity. In: Lovink G, Rasch M (eds) Unlike us reader: social media monopolies and their alternatives. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, pp 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM, Braman D, Cohen GL, Gastil J, Slovic P (2010) Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law Hum Behav 34:501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh B (2016) Pokémon go and the politics of digital gaming in public. Overland online journal. https://overland.org.au/2016/07/pokemon-go-and-the-politics-of-digital-gaming-in-public. Accessed 14 July 2016

  • Kilian T (1997) Public and private: power and space. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard JF (1985) The postmodern condition. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E, Coad R (2015) Design, when everybody designs: an introduction to design for social innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (2016) The urban apparatus: mediapolitics and the city. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27:415–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuire S (2006) The politics of public space in the media city. First Monday, peer reviewed journal on the internet. Special issue #4: Urban screens: discovering the potential of outdoor screens for urban society. https://www.firstmonday.org/article/view/1544/1459. Accessed 10 Apr 2019

  • Mela A (2014) Urban public space between fragmentation control and conflict. City Territory Architect 1:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertes T (ed) (2004) A movement of movements: is another world really possible? Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra D, Hall OP (2007) The death of time and distance. Graziadio Business Rev 10(1). https://gbr.pepperdine.edu/2010/08/the-death-of-time-and-distance. Accessed 3 Sept 2017

  • Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum H, Varnelis K (2012) Situated technologies pamphlets 9: modulated cities: networked spaces, reconstituted subjects. Architectural League of New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann E (1993) The spiral of silence: public opinion, our social skin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi L (2015) Where 2.0: exploring the place experience of “hyperconnected” digital media. Users Sociologica 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulouro Neves JPL (2012) The eradication of public space: dissolving liminal states. In: Pinto da Silva M (ed) EURAU12 Porto—Espaço Público e Cidade Contemporânea: Actas do 6° European symposium on research in architecture and urban design. Porto: FAUP

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzoni L (2003) Knowledge, uncertainty and the transformation of the public sphere. Eur J Soc Theory 6(3):327–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A (2016) What can you do when Pokémon Go decides your house is a gym? Augmented reality and private spaces don’t mix. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/7/12/12159422/pokemon-go-turned-house-into-gym-augmented-reality-privacy. Accessed 7 Aug 2018

  • Ropeik D (2012) How tribalism overrules reason and makes risky times more dangerous. https://bigthink.com/risk-reason-and-reality/how-tribalism-overrules-reason-and-makes-risky-times-more-dangerous

  • Sennett R (1976) The fall of public man. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G (1975 [1903]) The metropolis and mental life. In: Wolff KH (ed) The sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein C (2002) The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos 10(2):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck J, Poell T, de Waal M (2018) The platform society: public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M (2000) Community in the abstract: a political and ethical dilemma. In: Bell D, Kennedy B (eds) The cybercultures reader. Routledge, London, pp 644–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin S (1995) The culture of cities. Blackwell, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jachna, T. (2021). From the Individual to the Public. In: Wiring the Streets, Surfing the Square. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66672-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66672-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66671-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66672-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics