Abstract
Digital technologies facilitate the formation of communities, which are distinct from the broader, more inclusive concept of the public. They are enmeshed in pronounced ways in the emergence of a “society of individuals” and a retreat from public space (and into virtual pseudo-spaces) that problematizes traditional notions of the constitution of publics and the pursuit of public life. These technologies are also implicated in the problematization of the supposed binary distinction between public and private spaces and practices. However, they also are being used in forging new modes of public interactions and relationships with different impacts on the public space of the city.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
And, it could be argued, the radio and television.
- 2.
The category of private space should not be confused with the privacy of the individual, which is a right that applies in any type of space, public or private. Privacy has many facets—the right to personal secrecy, commercial activity, the defensible space of the family or community among them.
- 3.
Bateson has pointed out the pervasiveness of the habit of binary thinking, such that we seek to apply it even to things that are not binary in nature. The public/private distinction could be seen as one of these relations. This raises the question of whether there is a cogent Batesonian ternary relationship to replace the public/private distinction, establishing a relationship that is, to borrow another of Bateson’s distinctions, not symmetrical, with each vying for the same dominant position, but complementary, with each defining itself in relation to the others.
References
Arendt H (1998 [1958]). The human condition (2nd edn). University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Banerjee T (2001) The future of public space: beyond invented streets and reinvented places. J Am Plan Assoc 67(1):9–24
Barney D (2003) Invasions of publicity. In: Law Commission of Canada. New perspectives on the public-private divide. UBC Press, Vancouver
Bateson G (1935) Culture contact and schismogenesis. Man 35:178–183
Bauman Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, New Delhi. Translated from Beck U (1986) Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Benjamin W (2002) The arcades project (trans: Eiland H, McLaughlin K). Belknap Press, New York
Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comp Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230
Cairncross F (1997) The death of distance: how the communications revolution will change our lives. Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge
Chua A (2018) Political tribes: group instinct and the fate of nations. Penguin, London
Cooper G (2001) The mutable mobile: social theory in the wireless world. In: Brown B, Green N, Harper R (eds) Wireless world: social and interactional aspects of the mobile age. Springer, London, pp 19–31
Cooper R (2018) Tribalism is not the problem. The Week. https://theweek.com/articles/802580/tribalism-not-problem. Accessed 13 Nov 2019
d’Entreves MP (2016) Hannah Arendt. In: Zalta EN (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/arendt/. Accessed 17 Apr 2018
Dayan D, Katz E (1992) Media events: the live broadcasting of history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
de Cauter L (2004) The capsular civilisation: on the city in the age of fear. NAi Publishers, Rotterdam
Dewey F (1997) Cyburbanism as a way of life. In: Ellin N (ed) Architecture of fear. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton, pp 260–280
Fraser N (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25(26):56–80
Giddens A (2014) Turbulent and mighty continent: what future for Europe? Polity, Cambridge
Goldberger P (2003) Disconnected urbanism. Metropolis Magazine, p 66
Graham S, Marvin S (1996) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, New York
Habermas J (1989 [1962]) The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Polity, Cambridge
Hampton KN, Rainie L, Lu W, Dwyer M, Shin I, Purcell K (2014) Social media and the “spiral of silence”. Pew Research Center, Washington
Hardt M, Negri A (2004) Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. Penguin, New York
Heidegger M (2008 [1927]) Being and time. Harper Perennial, New York
Hendrix S (2016) Traffic-weary homeowners and Waze are at war, again. Guess who’s winning? The Washington Post online. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/traffic-weary-homeowners-and-waze-are-at-war-again-guess-whos-winning/2016/06/05/c466df46-299d-11e6-b989-4e5479715b54_story.html?utm_source=SFFB&utm_term=.de3b703b5d2e. Accessed 27 Apr 2018
Holmes D (ed) (1997) Virtual politics: identity and community in cyberspace. Sage, London
Hosanagar K (2016) Blame the echo chamber on Facebook but blame yourself too. Wired Magazine online edition. https://www.wired.com/2016/11/facebook-echo-chamber. Accessed 25 Aug 2018
Innerarity D (2016) Governance in the new global disorder: politics for a post-sovereign society (trans: Kingery S). Columbia University Press, New York
Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York
Jurgenson N, Rey PJ (2013) The fan dance: how privacy thrives in an age of hyper-publicity. In: Lovink G, Rasch M (eds) Unlike us reader: social media monopolies and their alternatives. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, pp 61–75
Kahan DM, Braman D, Cohen GL, Gastil J, Slovic P (2010) Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law Hum Behav 34:501–516
Keogh B (2016) Pokémon go and the politics of digital gaming in public. Overland online journal. https://overland.org.au/2016/07/pokemon-go-and-the-politics-of-digital-gaming-in-public. Accessed 14 July 2016
Kilian T (1997) Public and private: power and space. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Lyotard JF (1985) The postmodern condition. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Manzini E, Coad R (2015) Design, when everybody designs: an introduction to design for social innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge
Martin R (2016) The urban apparatus: mediapolitics and the city. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol 27:415–444
McQuire S (2006) The politics of public space in the media city. First Monday, peer reviewed journal on the internet. Special issue #4: Urban screens: discovering the potential of outdoor screens for urban society. https://www.firstmonday.org/article/view/1544/1459. Accessed 10 Apr 2019
Mela A (2014) Urban public space between fragmentation control and conflict. City Territory Architect 1:15
Mertes T (ed) (2004) A movement of movements: is another world really possible? Verso, London
Mishra D, Hall OP (2007) The death of time and distance. Graziadio Business Rev 10(1). https://gbr.pepperdine.edu/2010/08/the-death-of-time-and-distance. Accessed 3 Sept 2017
Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, New York
Nissenbaum H, Varnelis K (2012) Situated technologies pamphlets 9: modulated cities: networked spaces, reconstituted subjects. Architectural League of New York
Noelle-Neumann E (1993) The spiral of silence: public opinion, our social skin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Parisi L (2015) Where 2.0: exploring the place experience of “hyperconnected” digital media. Users Sociologica 3
Paulouro Neves JPL (2012) The eradication of public space: dissolving liminal states. In: Pinto da Silva M (ed) EURAU12 Porto—Espaço Público e Cidade Contemporânea: Actas do 6° European symposium on research in architecture and urban design. Porto: FAUP
Pellizzoni L (2003) Knowledge, uncertainty and the transformation of the public sphere. Eur J Soc Theory 6(3):327–355
Robertson A (2016) What can you do when Pokémon Go decides your house is a gym? Augmented reality and private spaces don’t mix. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/7/12/12159422/pokemon-go-turned-house-into-gym-augmented-reality-privacy. Accessed 7 Aug 2018
Ropeik D (2012) How tribalism overrules reason and makes risky times more dangerous. https://bigthink.com/risk-reason-and-reality/how-tribalism-overrules-reason-and-makes-risky-times-more-dangerous
Sennett R (1976) The fall of public man. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
Simmel G (1975 [1903]) The metropolis and mental life. In: Wolff KH (ed) The sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press, New York
Sunstein C (2002) The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos 10(2):175–195
van Dijck J, Poell T, de Waal M (2018) The platform society: public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wilson M (2000) Community in the abstract: a political and ethical dilemma. In: Bell D, Kennedy B (eds) The cybercultures reader. Routledge, London, pp 644–658
Zukin S (1995) The culture of cities. Blackwell, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jachna, T. (2021). From the Individual to the Public. In: Wiring the Streets, Surfing the Square. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66672-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66672-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66671-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66672-9
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)