Skip to main content

Us and Others

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wiring the Streets, Surfing the Square

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

  • 437 Accesses

Abstract

Based on the principle of the social production of space, this chapter examines the dual role of digital technologies as technologies of control and technologies of freedom. The structures and biases that are imposed on public space and public life by the mediating role of digital technologies, both on regimes of control and on the exercise of free will in day-to-day life, is articulated. The metaphor of the interface is introduced to encompass commonalities between the affordances of digital technologies and the nature of public space. The role of spatiality in physical public space and the spatial metaphor applied to digital “spaces” is expanded upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The distinction between these two senses of this word is made for the sake of the discussion of a specific point relevant to the issue of public space and not to propose that these two senses of the word constitute an exhaustive or fundamental dichotomy. These are just two of the several ways in which the term is used. Newtonian absolute space, for instance, is a more fundamental and abstract concept than either of these, just as space in the sense of a constructed room or enclosure is a more concrete and prosaic one.

  2. 2.

    Many have applied LeFebvre’s concept of the production of space to virtual worlds (McIntosh, 2008) and other digital social platforms.

  3. 3.

    And, of course, preceding this extraction is the paring-down of the limitless expanse of space to the vanishingly miniscule portion thereof that is subject to human habitation, as determined by the exigencies imposed by the requirements and limitations of our biological bodies.

  4. 4.

    As of 2010, around 3.6 million square kilometers of the earth’s 149 million square kilometers of land area was urbanized (World Bank), or about 2.4 percent of the planet’s dry surface. The Inter-American Development Bank proposed a normative allotment of 7–10 hectares of public space for every 100,000 urban dwellers (IDB, 2013). At the current world population of 7.6 billion and urbanization rate of 54 percent of the population, this yields a norm of 2870 to 4100 square kilometers of urban public space (a total size between the sizes of the urban areas of, say, Nagoya and Los Angeles), from .08 percent and .11 per cent of urbanized areas, or around 1/40,000 of earth’s land area.

  5. 5.

    It is acknowledged that these are time-bound (and in many cases place-bound) limitations. The era of colonization and westward expansion in North America sustained, for a time, imaginaries of unbounded potential for settlement. Similar imaginaries linked to the promise of maritime and extraterrestrial expansion of human settlement have perennially gained and lost currency in the modern era. The parameters of the limits of potential future expansion of geographical space for settlement are quantifiable (the water surface of the earth 361 million square kilometers, the surface of the moon 38 million, the surface of Mars 145 million, augmentable by above-ground and below ground multiplication of area, as well as artificial space colonies, dependent on available technologies and resources). Trans-human developments of the future that enable the decoupling of human consciousness from human bodies would require the development of an understanding of publics decoupled from material space, which would entail a fundamental reconfiguration of concepts of being-together as humans.

References

  • Acconci V (1990) Public space in a private time. Crit Inq 16(4):900–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altheide DL (2013) Media logic, social control, and fear. In: Couldry N, Hepp A (guest eds) Communication theory 23(3). Special issue: conceptualizing mediatization, pp 223–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt H (1998) [1958] The human condition, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry DM (2013) Against remediation. In: Lovink G, Rasch M (eds) Unlike us reader: social media monopolies and their alternatives. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter JD, Grusin R (2000) Remediation: understanding new media. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1994) Structures, habitus, power: basis for a theory for symbolic power. In: Dirks NB, Eley G, Ortner SB (eds) Culture/power/history: a reader in contemporary social theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone AM (1992) Public space (environment and behavior series). Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau (1984) The practice of everyday life (trans: Rendall S). University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N (1990) Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25(26):56–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson W (1984) Neuromancer. Ace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1986) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville R (1997) Behind the curtain. In: Ascott R (ed) Consciousness reframed I. UWC, Newport

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell CT (2003) The concept of public space and its democratic manifestations. Am Rev Public Admin 33(4):361–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham S, Marvin S (1996) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984 [1981]) Theory of communicative action, volume one: reason and the rationalization of society (trans. McCarthy TA). Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1987 [1981]) Theory of communicative action, volume two: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason (trans. McCarthy TA). Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht J (2016) The bandwidth bottleneck that is throttling the Internet. Nature magazine online. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-bandwidth-bottleneck-that-is-throttling-the-internet/. Accessed 20 Nov 2018

  • Hou J (2012) Making public, beyond public space. In: Shiffman R, Bell R, Brown LJ, Elizabeth L (eds) Beyond Zuccotti park: freedom of assembly and the occupation of public space. New Village Press, Oakland, pp 89–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2001) Reclaiming the commons. New Left Rev 9(9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1991 [1974]) The production of space (trans. Smith DN). Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW, Clarke S, Ariew R (2000 [1716]) Leibniz and Clarke: correspondence. Hackett, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessig L (2004) Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leszczynski A (2015) Spatial mediation. Prog Hum Geogr 39(6):729–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2005) For space. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan M (1964) Understanding media: the extensions of man. Mentor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles M (1997) Art, space and the city: public art and urban futures. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miraftab F (2004) Invented and invited spaces of participation: neoliberal citizenship and feminists’ expanded notion of politics. J Trans Womens Gender Stud 1(1). http://web.cortland.edu/wagadu/vol1–1toc.html. Accessed 22 Nov 2019

  • Mumford L (1981) The culture of cities. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford L (2010 [1934]) Technics and civilization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Nim E (2016) Nanodemonstrations as media events: networked forms of the Russian protest movement. In: Baker M, Blaagaard BB (eds) Citizen media and public spaces: diverse expressions of citizenship and dissent. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist HU, Brand S (2013) “We haven’t noticed that we are as gods”: Hans Ulrich Obrist in conversation with Stewart brand. Electronic Beats Magazine

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask G (1969) The architectural relevance of cybernetics. Archit Des 7(6):494–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph E (1976) Place and placelessness. Pion Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler S (2008) An architecture of the whole. J Archit Educ 61(4):108–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (2006) Making public interventions in today’s massive cities. Static 04, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedroff N (2001) Experience design. Waite Group Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G (1975 [1903]) The metropolis and mental life. In: Wolff KH (ed) The sociology of Georg Simmel. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone AM (2004) For the city yet to come: changing African life in four cities. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication (learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JB (1995) The media and modernity: a social theory of the media. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan YF (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine G (2013) Children should be seen and not heard: the production and transgression of adults’ public space. Urban Geogr 17(3):205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van’t Hof C, van Est R (2011) Introduction: living in the net. In: Van’t Hof C, van Est R, Daemens F (eds) Check in/check out: the public space as an internet of things. NAI010, Rotterdam, pp 11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1):121–136

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jachna, T. (2021). Us and Others. In: Wiring the Streets, Surfing the Square. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66672-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66672-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66671-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66672-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics