Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of the Impact of Changeover Time and Priority Rules on the Timely Execution of Customer Orders

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations in Industrial Engineering (icieng 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1185 Accesses

Abstract

The article is the preliminary research results determining the influence of selected criteria on the timeliness of customer orders, the workstation load and the required size of the finished products warehouse. The criteria included in this paper are the changeover time and the priority rule. The literature analysis covers issues related to the priority rules and machine changeover. The following part of the work presents the adopted research methodology, production process model and input data. Production plans were prepared successively and 9 model variants were designated, with different changeover times and priority rules applied. The work also simulated the production process in the FlexSim program, using previously prepared production plans. For the evaluation of the models, a summary of the obtained results was taken into account, showing the timely execution of customer orders, the workstation load and the required size of the finished products warehouse. The article ended with conclusions, in which a variant was indicated, in which a combination of factors allows to achieve the highest punctuality of order fulfillment, the smallest size of the warehouse and the optimal load of workstations (the shortest inactivity, the longest implementation of the production process).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Varela, M.L.R., Trojanowska, J., Carmo-Silva, S., Costa, N.M.L., Machado, J.: Comparative simulation study of production scheduling in the hybrid and the parallel flow. Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev. 1(2), 10–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kłos, S., Patalas-Maliszewska, J.: Throughput analysis of automatic production lines based on simulation methods. In: Jackowski, K., Burduk, R., Walkowiak, K., Woźniak, M., Yin, H. (eds.) IDEAL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9375, pp. 181–190. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24834-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunz, G., Machado, J., Perondi, E.: Using timed automata for modeling, simulating and verifying networked systems controller’s specifications. Neural Comput. Appl. 28(5), 1031–1041 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2115-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sika, R., Hajkowski, J.: Synergy of modeling processes in the area of soft and hard modeling. In: 8th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education (MSE), Trends in New Industrial Revolution. EDP Sciences (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sika, R., Rogalewicz, M.: Demerit Control Chart as a decision support tool in quality control of ductile cast-iron casting process. In: 8th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education (MSE), Trends in New Industrial Revolution. EDP Sciences (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamrol. A.: Strategies and practices of efficient operation. LEAN SIX SIGMA and other. PWN, Warsaw (2015). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diering, M., Dyczkowski, K.: Assessing the raters agreement in the diagnostic catheter tube connector production process using novel fuzzy similarity coefficient. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 228–232 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jasarevic, S., Diering, M., Brdarevic, S.: Opinions of the consultants and certification houses regarding the quality factors and achieved effects of the introduced quality system. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette 19(2), 211–220 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borkowski, S., Knop, K.: Challenges faced in modern quality inspection. Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev. 7(3), 11–22 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Trojanowska, J., Kolinski, A., Galusik, D., Varela, M.L.R., Machado, J.: A methodology of improvement of manufacturing productivity through increasing operational efficiency of the production process. In: Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., Jurczyk, M. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing. LNME, pp. 23–32. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Liker, J.K.: The Toyota Way, 14 Management Principles from the Worlds Greatest Manufacturer. 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Concalves, T.I.G., Sousa, P.S.A., Moreira, M.R.A.: Does lean practices implementation impact on company performance? A meta-analytical research. Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev. 10(4), 11–24 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Korytkowski, P., Grimaud, F., Dolgiu, A.: Exponential smoothing for multi-product lot-sizing with heijunka and varying demand. Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev. 5(2), 20–26 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dennis, P.: Lean Production Simplified, 2nd edn. Productivity Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shingo, S.: A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. Productivity Press, Stanford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ulutas, B.: An application of SMED methodology. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. 1194–1197 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarkar, B., Sarkar, M.: Application of Optimalization in Production, Logistics, Inventory, Supply Chain Management and Block Chain, MDPI, Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Mathematics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graves, S.C.: A review of production scheduling. Oper. Res. 29(4), 646–675 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Fuchigami, H.Y., Rangel, S.: A survey of case studies in production scheduling: analysis and perspectives. J. Comput. Sci. 25, 425–436 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vanhoucke, M.: Optimizing regular scheduling objectives: schedule generation schemes. PM Knowledge Center (2012). http://www.pmknowledgecenter.com/dynamic_scheduling/baseline/optimizing-regular-scheduling-objectives-schedule-generation-schemes. Accessed 15 Dec 2019

  21. Chakrabortty, R.K., Rahman, H.F., Ryan,M.J.: Efficient priority rules for project scheduling under dynamic environments: a heuristic approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 140, 106287 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wróblewski, K.J., Krawczyński, R., Kosieradzka, A., Kasprzyk, S.: Priority Rules in Manufacturing Flow Control. Scientific and Technical Publishing House, Warsaw (1984). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Binchao, C., Matis, T.I.: A flexible dispatching rule for minimizing tardiness in job shop scheduling. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 141(1), 360–365 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Błażewicz, J., Ecker, K.H., Pesch, E., Schmidt, G., Węglarz, J.: Scheduling in Computer and Manufacturing Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03217-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Jardzioch, A., Bulwan, K.: The prioritisation of production orders under the bee colony algorithm. Adv. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 37(4), 49–59 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krenczyk, D., Skołud, B.: Transient states of cyclic production planning and control. Appl. Mech. Mater. 657, 961–965 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Trojanowska, J., Varela, M.L.R., Machado, J.: The tool supporting decision making process in area of job-shop scheduling. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A.M., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds.) WorldCIST 2017. AISC, vol. 571, pp. 490–498. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56541-5_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Baker, K.R., Dan, T.D.: Principles of Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, New Jersey (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Vieira, G.G., Varela, M.L.R., Putnik, G.D., Machado, J.M., Trojanowska, J.: Integrated platform for real-time control and production and productivity monitoring and analysis, Romanian review precision mechanics. Opt. Mechatron. (Mecahitech’16) 50, 119–127 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rewers, P., Trojanowska, J., Diakun, J., Rocha, A., Reis, L.P.: A study of priority rules for a levelled production plan. In: Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., Jurczyk, M. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing. LNME, pp. 111–120. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The studies were realized with a support from statutory activity financed by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (0613/SBAD/4677).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Poznan University of Technology, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie 5 sq., 60-965, Poznan, Poland

    Paulina Rewers & Anna Karwasz

  2. Intitek Polska Sp. z o. o., Baraniaka 88C/Building D Street, 61-131, Poznan, Poland

    Marta Czaja

Authors
  1. Paulina Rewers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Karwasz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marta Czaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulina Rewers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal

    José Machado

  2. Department of Industrial Electronics, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal

    Filomena Soares

  3. Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland

    Justyna Trojanowska

  4. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Machines and Tools, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine

    Vitalii Ivanov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rewers, P., Karwasz, A., Czaja, M. (2022). Analysis of the Impact of Changeover Time and Priority Rules on the Timely Execution of Customer Orders. In: Machado, J., Soares, F., Trojanowska, J., Ivanov, V. (eds) Innovations in Industrial Engineering. icieng 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78170-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78170-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78169-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78170-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation